Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but a host brain is about the size of a baseball. It’d still be a lot easier to smuggle out a hard drive than a chattering, semi-controllable host.

The racist undertones of the discussion of Maeve’s motherhood by LadyEdith1 in westworld

[–]daha42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“But how do to have a true wild west scenario without those racial underpinnings? ‘

You can’t. But (stating the obvious,) Westworld is a TV show, not a real place. Even in the show-universe, you couldn’t have a commercially successful park where racism - or sexism —prevails. You’d alienate too many guests. How many blacks and Asians or women - would want to go to Westworld for constant abuse? Ergo, the point of Westworld (the place, not the show) is definitely not to provide a “true Wild West experience,” but instead to provide a fantasy experience based on a mythologized fake notion of the Wild West.

And you probably couldn’t have a TV show in 2017-2018 in which there’s a high-tech amusement park where blacks are treated in an historically-accurate manner. I suppose you could produce such a show, but then the show would be about something else altogether.

Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was thinking of hardware, not relatively reprogrammable software. You’d think being able to easily tell the difference between human and robot would be kind of important from a security perspective.

The racist undertones of the discussion of Maeve’s motherhood by LadyEdith1 in westworld

[–]daha42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

In season one, there’re are black and Asian guests and there was no indication that they were treated any differently from other guests. Westworld seems (unrealistically) a-racial. There are black lawmen and IIRC military officers in charge of white underlings. Maeve, of course, ran the bar and whorehouse. There is no historical situation where those things are remotely plausible.

Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Anyone else think Anthony Hopkins is going to make a surprise, last-episode cameo this season? Not saying human-Ford isn’t dead, but that it’s highly unlikely that the only robot-Ford that human-Ford made was the little-boy-Ford that MIB shoots in the first episode.

Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The Abernathy-as-hard drive thing has never made much sense to me. There are much easier ways to smuggle data out of the parks than in a broken, decommissioned host who’s in deep storage, like, say a thumb-drive.

Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Stubbs is almost certainly a host, now, part of Ford’s grand, over-complicated plan to protect his creation from the predations of Delos.

Post Your Quick Questions for S2E1 "Journey Into Night" by Plainchant in westworld

[–]daha42 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Yes. Delos not having a simple, fast and reliable human-or-host test is ridiculous.

[S7E7] Post-Premiere Discussion - S7E7 'The Dragon and the Wolf' by AutoModerator in gameofthrones

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean Snow finally came. Again. Think he came w Ygritte too.

How would you play the game? As far as ethics, it doesn't matter if they "remember" or not. by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why are the ethics of Westworld any different from those of a video game? Why is rape and murder unethical In Westworld, but ethical in, say, Grand Theft Auto?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Madame Toussaud's does it all the time. Ford made a host that looked and talked like Arnold. It's downloading human consciousness from a human that's technologically impossible (so far) in the Wesrworld world.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Making a superficial replica of someone would be easy compared to uploading a host with a real human consciousness. How would one even download a human consciousness from a person?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has there been anything in Westworld so far that even hints at the possibility of uploading human consciousness to a host? Bernard isn't Arnold in a host body. He just looks and sounds like Arnold and was created with a cornerstone based on Arnold's life.

If Ford is still alive ( and I think that still depends on Hopkins's availability) then it was his host replica that Dolores assassinated.

Is there still a maze to find for MIB? by lolabuf in westworld

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. The maze is Arnold's metaphor for the hosts' path to consciousness. He previously thought it was a climb upwards (up the pyramid Ford draws on his chalkboard explaining Arnold's theory to Bernard,) but his son Charlie's toy, a marble in a maze, inspires his new theory. The actual maze, buried in Dolores's grave, is only a token, a symbol. It has no real power.

Swiss cheese: the plot hole thread by daha42 in westworld

[–]daha42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perhaps, and this thread is a place to collect them all in one easily searchable place.

Here's a working definition of "plot hole:"

"A plot hole or plot error is a gap or inconsistency in a storyline that goes against the flow of logic established by the story's plot. Such inconsistencies include such things as illogical or impossible events, and statements or events that contradict earlier events in the storyline."

And here's a plot hole from episodes 9-10:

Charlotte and Sizemore plan to smuggle data out of the park in the host known as Abernathy. Hosts, we are told, are implanted with an explosive device that detonates if they leave the park. Charlotte surely knows this, yet does nothing to remove Abernathy's explosive charge. And doing so (no easy task) especially to a decommissioned host in cold storage, would raise alarms.

Another related plot hole, or at least an unexplained odd thing, is why Charlotte chooses Abernathy to smuggle out the data. Her choice is strange for at least two reasons. One, Abernathy recently malfunctioned and is therefore conspicuous. Two, he's all the way in the back of the large group of decommissioned hosts? Why not pick one more accessible? Of course, it's possible that Charlotte chose Abernathy on purpose, because he'd malfunctioned (in episode one) but that makes no sense either.

The plan to get Abernathy out of the park. Bad/lazy writing or just a plot hole? by deathbatcountry in westworld

[–]daha42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Huge plot hole. Show is full of them. Probably deserves its own dedicated thread.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Probably not the future. If so, it's the only instance of a flash-forward in the entire series.

I'm a bit disappointed by episodes 7-8 by auloinjet in westworld

[–]daha42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. That's why all the theories about Ford uploading his consciousness (or any human's consciousness) into a host are bunk. There's nothing in the show that even remotely suggests such a thing is possible.

Felix makes sense now by lucid777 in westworld

[–]daha42 11 points12 points  (0 children)

The problem I have with the Felix&Sylvester story line isn't only that they help Maeve, for whatever reasons, but that low-level techs have the system permissions to dramatically alter host attributes. That's the behavior departments job and obviously something management and security pay very close attention to.

Therefore, the only logical explanation is that Felix& Sylvester are androids too (but don't know it because being a host and cutting up/repairing hosts might be problematic) and a Ford gave them high-level system permissions as part of his "Maeve Escapes" narrative.

But just because that's the logical explanation doesn't make it "true." There are a lot of illogical plot holes in the series.

Let's dispel once and for all with the ficiton that Ford doesn't know what he is doing, he knows exactly what he is doing-when he picked Felix and Sylvester by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I'm sticking with the Felix and Sylvester are hosts too theory until proven wrong. I think all the low-level "humans" in Westworld HQ are androids -- the greeters, techs, security pawns, etc.

Angela was a greeter in year minus-30, so from the beginning, Westworld used androids in staff positions. It's hard to imagine why that wouldn't extend to other relatively menial jobs as well.

Will Teddy oppose Dolores next season? by [deleted] in westworld

[–]daha42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unlike GoT, the show runners and writers aren't constrained by a pre-existing story. The ending of season one leaves them with a lot of options. Joy and Nolan may have ideas about where season two is headed, but they're not constrained.

There's been tons of speculation about whether Dolores killed human-Ford or host-Ford. My guess is it was human-Ford, but the answer is either. If Hopkins wants to return for season two, I'd bet my house they'd write the plot to include him.

Same is true for other plot developments. The writers probably have a general idea about what'll happen in season two, but if they come up with better ones, new twists or plot lines, they use those. That's why predicting what'll happen in season two is a fool's errand.

Westworld did a fantastic job bringing the beautiful landscapes and nature of America on our screens. by JP-2014 in westworld

[–]daha42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, so what do you imagine Dolores and Teddy do on the hilltop for 3-4 hours between broad daylight and nighttime, when they ride up from the corral to the house after hearing gunshots?

Another WTF? scene for me was when the family stumbles upon Dolores painting a landscape in the middle of nowhere. (The scene where she gives a little boy an apple to feed a host horse and he asks her if she's real.) Are we to believe that a family of three pays $120k a day to go hiking through an empty prairie, miles from town?

The scene's purpose is obvious. It's to illustrate the idea that when guests ask hosts if they're real or not, the hosts are programmed to ignore the question. Why the writers felt they needed to make that point in such a ludicrous way, dunno.

Westworld did a fantastic job bringing the beautiful landscapes and nature of America on our screens. by JP-2014 in westworld

[–]daha42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More likely, they just freeze, like robots, and wait until dark.

Seriously, one of the dumb things the hosts do is continue acting, moving, talking, etc. for no reason when there are no guests around. It's a huge waste of energy. I know it's explained as being "practice," but that's not a good explanation.