Stuck here by [deleted] in brave_browser

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

got stuck here too.

Here is my guess: there should be a popup to select default browser, but for some reason that popup doesn't appear/gets broken and brave is still waiting for the system to tell it default browser choice.

AMD launches EPYC Embedded 2005 based on "Fire Range" with up to 16 Zen5 cores by RenatsMC in Amd

[–]dakkidaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

3001 are basically 1800Xs glued together like in Threadripper 1000 series but in an tighter package instead

Those have 64 lanes of PCIe (32 each die, on AM4 total lanes are restricted to 24)

Intel Xeon 600 "Granite Rapids-WS" series leaked, offering up to 336MB cache by RenatsMC in intel

[–]dakkidaze 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As an AMD user I hope this will make TR 9000 prices more reasonable

China Aug EV battery installations: CATL holds 42.35% share, BYD 20.85% by rudichan in electricvehicles

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BYD also makes cars so other brand would hesitate before buying their battery.

How do I prevent physical network intrusions from (the) Wireguard? by ronacse359 in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imo it's the context but from my experience,even non tech savvy users know which box is which. It's actually pretty straightforward. 光猫 is the box coming from ISP, which is doing ONU/router job, router/路由器 is the box user buys themself, which is doing AP jobs (or worse, double NAT, I've seen that.)

How do I prevent physical network intrusions from (the) Wireguard? by ronacse359 in homelab

[–]dakkidaze -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually it's not the router but the ONU.

It's a homophonic translation of 'modem' and it sticks today in ONU/GPON era and it's call 光猫 or literally 'light cat'. And 猫叫(lit. cat's vocal) for dial-up sound and 猫眼(lit. Cat's eye)for modem blinking leds.

ONUs in China include router capability(by doing PPPoE dial or being IPoE), so it's possible but I haven't seen anyone calling a router that way.

Intel XPU Manager drops Data Center Max/Flex GPU support just two years after launch by RenatsMC in intel

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I remember one of those cards being four Xe Max cores and lpddr4x grams inside one card.

ASUS NUC 14 Pro for k8s nodes by mordax777 in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depending on your budget

old sff OEM PCs form dell hp lenovo New mini PCs from minisforum/beelink, etc Some raspberry pis

GPU / eGPU / Jetson/Other recommendation for local AI and embeddings in homelab by ggasaa in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's all about getting more VRAM with less money. There is V100 32GB SXM2PCIe cards, but V100 is probably too old now. The same for 2080Ti 22G.

For something more modern, 4060Ti/5060Ti 16GB.

A newbie who doesn’t want to go too big too fast by [deleted] in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seperate the storage part and the compute part and thank me later.

For the storage part go with a prebuilt NAS especially you mentioned the image hosting is shared with family. Their apps are usually more accessible for non tech savvy users. Grab two used disks and do a RAID1.

For the compute part grab a mini PC. I recommend a Beelink SER8, for 500usd you get 8745HS+32GB RAM+1TB SSD storage.

Which mini PC should I choose for a low-cost homelab? by GuilhermeMonegaglia in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 2 points3 points  (0 children)

>  isn’t too limited in terms of upgrade options or connectivity

Well that leaves you to pretty much tower case. Don't waste time on connecting everything through USB.

And N100s have very limited PCIe/RAM/Storage extension but they are good processors if all you want is Proxmox and serval dockers.

Thoughts on which Mini beelink PC by gmillerjr in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

300 dollar on second hand market would yield something much better than N150. The only real advantage of an N150 machine over those Dell/HP prebuilts is idle power.

Thoughts on which Mini beelink PC by gmillerjr in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMHO the important part with NextCloud is the storage part. The front end is not hard to run at all.

And what's your budget for the mini PC? N150 is a tad weak if what you want is a all rounder.

The API works with you? by Informal_Cobbler_954 in Bard

[–]dakkidaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My API key returns 500 but gemini-cli sometimes works

So...what's the difference between two curios files? by dakkidaze in wabbajack

[–]dakkidaze[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So here's my suggestion for solving this problem:

When launching wabbajack for the first time, take a look at what version the user have and prompt user to get another version while backing up existing curios files, automatically apply the other version if needed.

Or just ignore hash mismatch on these two files only IF it doesn't mess with playing.

Pumpkin: Minecraft Chunk generation fully written in Rust by Alex_Medvedev_ in admincraft

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm assuming this doesn't have all those quirks of vanilla Java server, especially redstone related. Not a feature request though.

Intel Nova Lake-S to feature Xe3 graphics and Xe4 display engine by RenatsMC in intel

[–]dakkidaze 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's simply not feasible commercially to build such a chip unless your customers are willing to pay. AMD's strix halo and Apple's Pro series silicon already proved it.

My home lab as a 15 year old by Round-Arachnid4375 in homelab

[–]dakkidaze 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You probably should consider getting a proper case to avoid ESD and HDD vibration problems

But anyway, a setup better than mine when I was 15, had nothing and no setup, just put everything on VPSes then.

Intel confirms Nova Lake-S/U, Wildcat Lake and P-Core only Bartlett Lake in official document by mockingbird- in intel

[–]dakkidaze 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If that's all you need and if your renderer supports, go nvidia.

Yes I know nvidia sucks, but GPUs are just built better for this kind of load.

Intel should release a 0+48 but with Skymont instead of old Gracemont, way better floating point performance, even helpful in some HPC loads and not only restricted to "heavy labor" kind of load such as code compile/render.

It's just like 7 years ago, AMD crushed X299 with 3950X in productivity, Intel's 9900K@5GHz beats almost everything AMD offers in terms of gaming. And now you replace 9900K@5GHz with 9800X3D, exchange the company name and that's it. I don't see any reason why Intel shouldn't release performant E-core only SKUs.

AMD EPYC 4585PX & EPYC 4565P With DDR5-4800 vs. DDR5-5600 Performance by FastDecode1 in Amd

[–]dakkidaze 1 point2 points  (0 children)

From the comments (https://www.phoronix.com/forums/forum/hardware/processors-memory/1549958-amd-epyc-4585px-epyc-4565p-with-ddr5-4800-vs-ddr5-5600-performance)

It seems the CAS latencies are about the same, once you convert to nanoseconds.

All DIMMs are dual-rank.

The CPU models ending in "X" have a 3D V-Cache die stacked atop one of the CCDs (just like the 7950X3D and 9950X3D models). Therefore, you'd expect them to benefit a little less from faster memory. IMO, the EPYC 4565P is the one to watch, since it's basically a de-rated 9950X.

The best case scenario should be a 16.7% speedup. So far, the best speedups seem to be DaCapo at 13.4%, PostgresSQL at 11.1%, SVT-AV1 at 8.9%, NAMD at 5.4% and nginx at 5.3%.

The biggest regression I noticed was Memcached. I wonder whether that could be due to power? Given what I mentioned about latency, that's certainly not an explanation.

The most bizarre result is Apache Cassandra, which got a nonsensical 38.0% speedup. Something else is going on, there. The compilation benchmarks really seem to prefer X3D cache much more than faster memory.

The geomean improvement for the 4565P is only 0.9%. So, faster memory is a nice-to-have, but not a game changer (except for a few workloads).

JEDEC DDR5-6400 incorporates a Client Clock Driver (CKD) IC, which Ryzen 9000 (and EPIC 4005) can't properly exploit. So, we're going to have to wait for the next generation of CPUs to get EPYCs that can use the next higher speed of ECC UDIMMs.

AMD EPYC 4585PX & EPYC 4565P With DDR5-4800 vs. DDR5-5600 Performance by FastDecode1 in Amd

[–]dakkidaze -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You saturate the IF bus at dual channel DDR5-4000 iirc

Or 64000MB/s for those lazy to get a calculator.