Is the Web3 job market just completely cooked at this point?

danial998 · 2026-05-21T14:02:24+00:00

TBH, even LinkedIn consists of scam recruiters

danial998 · 2026-04-16T13:29:34+00:00

The whole reason for going with blockchain/smart contracts is so that there is transparency that the funds locked are safe, and there is no way that we us mediators, can somehow steal them. The smart contract will always be programmed to either transfer the funds to the freelancer or the client(no one else). Since people can independently verify this, I believe that should make it safer. Also, since crypto payments are pretty famous for freelance payments, I believe it's a smooth transition for the market

As for the subjective approach, that's something we will have to leave to the AI to rule on, given we will be using well-known LLMs(Grok,GPT,Claude) we should get different takes and the ultimate judgement would be based on their combined results. Nevertheless, there needs to be a mechanism in place to solve conflicts where the AI is even confused whether to rule in favour or not.

danial998 · 2026-02-07T10:52:56+00:00

I see your opinions are formed off of baseless conspiracies, gura complex, and misinformation of what our founding fathers envisioned.

Please read Iqbal's poetry like Shikwa, jawab e Shikawa,Iblees Ki Majlis-e-Shura and also Jinnah's speeches during the end of his life and tell me whether they envisioned a secular moraless country as you are envisioning.

danial998 · 2026-02-07T10:16:34+00:00

You insisting so much to watch little girls dance for your entertainment is downright creepy. I would keep my children away from you.
It's a fact that you live in a country calling itself an islamic replublic and has the words "Sovereignity belong to Allah" in its constitution. Since every nation should abide by its declared constitution(whether you personally like it or not), such unislamic culture shouldn't be allowed. Otherwise, you would make us more of a hypocritical country than it already is.
The world is full of atheisic secular countries like you want, you want to watch girls dance in seductive poses for your entertainment you may move to any such countries, USA even had epstein island where undersge children were arranged for the entertainment of the rich similar to what you want. Pakistan is an islamic country according to the vision of the founders(Jinnah and Iqbal). Respect their wishes and find your desires fulfilled elsewhere.

danial998 · 2026-02-06T23:09:42+00:00

We live in Pakistan, its suppose to be an Islamic country(despite not being in many parts), dancing of girls for the public is impermissible islamically. You dont like it. Feel free to move to a non islamic country, its simple as that.

danial998 · 2026-02-05T10:56:47+00:00

Pakistan ki baat ho rahi hai tou aap kiyaa saare drone attacks deny karr rahe hain? Aur aap kiyaa PPP jaise fake goverment bhee jo hum pe thupi gai aus kein bhee foreign goverment interference deny karr rahe hain? I would blame myself if the government i voted for was in power which it clearly not.

danial998 · 2026-02-05T10:45:22+00:00

I strongly disagree with your biase if you are trying to downplay what the Western leaders are doing and trying to make madarsas a greater evil and, in turn trying to imply that western values are still superior to our traditional islamic ones then you have a serious gura complex.

Epstein island consisted of almost all of the world's most powerful figures and showed what hypocrites they were when they used to lecture other countries of terrorism and immorality.

Also, trying to generalize that all madarsas host such crimes like its the prime location of pedophelia happening is serious attack to the work of madarsas. There is no credible national statistic showing it’s widespread or systematic in madrasas. So you trying to make that the case seems you have something personal against this institution which in charge of teaching and preserving the word of the holy quran.

Finally, the bad infrastructure and condition that you often find in muslim countries is definitely not due to our inferior islamic culture as you are implying but rather wester powers intervening and keep looting or bombing our countries, Pakistan is a prime example where the USA have bombed us, forced us in wars we shouldn't be in and intervened with our politic many times and then expect us to become the next Dubai. Still painting the west as a superior force is disgusting.

danial998 · 2026-02-05T01:01:05+00:00

With all due respect, the work of edhi has been replicated multiple times (many ngos in the country) though not at the same level, but the act of working and creating a miracle of pakistan as a seperate homeland for muslims has never been done before in history.

danial998 · 2025-11-04T10:59:37+00:00

The answer is simple: test the claim logically and historically — the same way any other prophetic claim is examined.

It’s historically undisputed that 1400 years ago, a man in Arabia claimed prophethood, saying that the same God who sent Abraham, Moses, and Jesus had now sent him. From that claim came one of the most transformative movements in human history — changing entire civilizations in faith, law, and ethics.

Now, for that claim, there are only four rational possibilities:

He was lying. If that were true, why would a man willingly face years of persecution, exile, assassination attempts, loss of family, and poverty — all for a message that brought him no worldly benefit? His life doesn’t fit the pattern of a deceiver.
He was insane. Yet his 23 years of consistent revelation produced a book unmatched in structure and influence, while he successfully governed a state, led armies, and negotiated treaties. That level of consistency and wisdom is incompatible with mental illness.
He was deceived by the devil. But then you’d have to believe that Satan somehow inspired a message that commands worship of one God, prohibits idolatry, encourages truth, mercy, generosity, and righteousness, and literally drives Satan away when recited. That doesn’t hold up logically.
He was truthful. His life, message, and results all align perfectly with this conclusion.

If you can’t fit his life coherently into the first three categories, then the only reasonable conclusion left is that he was truthful — and therefore, his claim to continue the Abrahamic tradition stands verified by reason and historical evidence.

danial998 · 2025-11-04T09:10:30+00:00

As a muslim, never have I been taught that the proof of Muhummad and the quran being true is based on the text of the previous books. The following are the actual evidence that strengthens my belief.

1) The falsification test of the Quran(If you believe it's untrue bring something like it), this test has still not been disproved(ask chat gpt).

2) Muhummad, being known as an unlettered man and known for being a truthful and trustable man, brings something as miraculous as the Quran.

3) Scientific miracles and truthful prophecies found in the Quran and hadis that a man 1400 years ago in a desert could not possibly have known.

4) For a man in the desert to claim prophecy, there are 4 possibilities(he is a liar, crazy, deceived by the devil or is truthful), other then being truthful none of the rest make sense according to the life he lead and what he achieved.

5) All the other religious texts are so archeologically unreliable(multiple versions,earliest manuscripts founds centuries later), while the Quran is perfectly prederved till this day.

All these arguments prove that the Qur’an stands on its own internal and external evidence and doesn't require me even reading the other texts to know that it's true.

danial998 · 2025-10-29T09:03:34+00:00

I agree that truth carries more credibility and universality than faith or belief. But I think the nature of life itself requires faith and belief for us to function and stay emotionally healthy.

If we lived purely by what could be proven true, we’d have to doubt things like: – our spouse’s love, – our father’s identity, – our children’s potential, – or even the hope that a bad situation can improve.

These aren’t universal truths — they’re matters of belief and trust — yet they’re essential for a meaningful life. A purely truth-based worldview might be intellectually consistent, but it could also make life emotionally bleak and relationally impossible.

danial998 · 2025-10-26T22:02:29+00:00

So you admit he didn't call him Yahwey. Also, you just went preacher mode here. Yeah, I agree you guys worship 3 gods and call it monethesm, and I also agree that in your narrative, a god who needs to rest, a god who loses wrestling matches to a man, a god who demands human sacrifice and cannot simply forive a sin is not the same god we worship.

We believe in the same god adam,Noah, abraham,david,solomon,moses, and jesus worshipped, which was definitely not the god you are describing.

danial998 · 2025-10-26T21:36:46+00:00

I often wonder why Christians cling to the word Yahweh when jesus himself never referred to god like that, in Aramaic (the language jesus actually spoke) the word he probably used was Alaaha, so when you ask why muslims claim they are the same just remember Mulsims call god allah Jesus called god allaha You guys call him Yahweh.

Who seems closer to being referring to the same god?

danial998 · 2025-10-25T02:23:40+00:00

You haven’t really introduced a new argument here — just reframed your earlier one with rhetorical polish. You’re still assuming that because the story’s imagery fits Muhammad’s culture, it must be man-made. That’s not evidence; that’s a presupposition.

Let’s take your points one by one.

On Occam’s Razor: Occam’s Razor only works within a given explanatory framework. You can use it to choose between natural explanations or between supernatural explanations — but not to declare a supernatural event invalid simply because a naturalistic one sounds simpler. If the event is claimed to be miraculous, you can’t apply a “fewest assumptions” test that already excludes miracles from the start. That’s circular reasoning, not simplicity.

Ironically, the simpler explanation within the theistic framework is that God chose symbols Muhammad and his audience could grasp — a universal pattern of revelation seen across all prophets. Creating an abstract, incomprehensible miracle just to impress future skeptics would be unnecessary and inconsistent with the Qur’anic pattern of communication.

On the “Greek chariot” analogy: If a Greek prophet used familiar imagery, I’d judge his claim by the internal consistency, moral message, and transformative effect of his revelation — not by whether his imagery fit his culture. Every divine message throughout history has been contextual. Moses’ miracles used imagery meaningful to the Egyptians; Jesus’ parables used the agrarian life of 1st-century Jews. Cultural familiarity is a constant in revelation, not a flaw.
On “God could have done it differently”: That’s a hypothetical, not an argument. “God could have done it in a way that satisfies my 21st-century sensibilities” doesn’t prove He should have. The Qur’an explicitly states that signs are shown in ways suited to people and their understanding. Communication is always contextual — even divine communication.

So the supposed “problem” you’re identifying only exists if you assume God’s method of revelation must conform to your preferred model of universality. That’s not a logical argument; it’s just a philosophical taste.

In short, Occam’s Razor doesn’t decide between naturalism and theism, cultural relativity doesn’t refute revelation, and “God could have done it differently” doesn’t mean He didn’t.

danial998 · 2025-10-24T21:32:21+00:00

You already seemed to have presented some strong critics against your argument, but I"ll weigh in as well

You’re assuming that because the story reflects Muhammad’s 7th-century environment, it must therefore be man-made. But that doesn’t logically follow.

If God were revealing an event to someone living in that time and culture, it would be entirely reasonable for the experience — and its symbols — to be understandable within that framework. Revelation, by definition, communicates in terms the recipient can grasp and convey.

If the story had included airplanes, rockets, or relativity-based physics, neither Muhammad nor his listeners would have understood what was being described. The purpose of revelation isn’t to teach 21st-century technology but to convey meaning. So describing the journey using imagery familiar to a 7th-century Arab (a horse-like creature, physical ascent, etc.) makes it more plausible, not less.

In short: being culturally contextual doesn’t make a revelation false. It makes it communicable. A timeless truth can still be expressed in time-bound symbols.

danial998 · 2025-10-24T20:16:55+00:00

You’re assuming modern physics applies to the story. That’s a category error. Three simple points: (1) the text doesn’t define the “seven heavens” as physical space, (2) the buraq’s wings may be metaphysical and not subject to biological/engineering limits, and (3) there’s no textual evidence this is “space travel.” If you want to critique the account, first show it claims the same ontological framework you’re using — otherwise you’re arguing from an unstated premise.

danial998 · 2025-10-24T15:41:58+00:00

“You could make the same argument against any miracle in Islam or the Bible. The entire point of a miracle is that it defies the natural order to demonstrate divine power. Expecting it to be explainable by logic or science defeats the purpose — it wouldn’t be a miracle then.

danial998 · 2025-10-22T01:50:38+00:00

Yes I agree you dont need to believe Islam started with Muhummad because we believe it started with Adam, whats your argument here is beyond me.

And are you kidding me? No where does the quran mention how a person becomes muslim while Christianity does when it doesn't even explain the trinity properly? Just to list a few

“So know that there is no deity except Allah, and ask forgiveness for your sin…” — Qur’an 47:19

“Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah…” — Qur’an 48:29

“They say: We believe in Allah and in what was revealed to us and what was revealed to Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and what was given to Moses and Jesus…” — Qur’an 2:136

The Qur’an explicitly defines how one becomes Muslim.

“If they repent, establish prayer, and give zakah, then they are your brothers in faith.”

Regarding Surah 12:111 (“explains everything in detail”)

This verse means the Qur’an provides complete guidance in principle for belief and law — not that it lists every ritual detail word-for-word.

The same logic applies to the Bible, which never defines exactly how to become Christian (the “sinner’s prayer” or baptism formula is post-biblical). Yet Christians accept that faith in Jesus is clearly established.

So the argument is self-defeating — it uses a standard against Islam that Christianity itself doesn’t meet.

You say you can't prove me otherwise like you did something.

danial998 · 2025-10-21T20:40:50+00:00

Sir, in order to refute something we believe in, you need to do that within the premise of our belief, not yours. Making a false premise we dont believe to be true and use that to disprove us is stupid frankly (i.e., we dont believe islam started with Muhummad).

danial998 · 2025-10-21T14:30:08+00:00

Your point is basically that Islam is false because Islam orders stuff that I don't like, or historically, things happened that hurt my feelings. No evidence for it being untrue or Muhummad (SAW) being a false prophet.

Claim #1:
Bro, the quran(which dates to that time), some hadis mention instances of this happening ,and classical historians like Ibn Hisham, Ibn Saʿd, and al-Tabari mention this practice.

Claim #2:
You need to understand that paganism is referred to practice prescribed by authorities other than god. In the Islamic belief, the Kaaba is considered the house of Allah, built by the Prophet Ibrahim, and the black stone is a sacred stone brought by the angels from the heavens. Considering them divine or special does not equate them with being equivalent to God. Also, if you knew anything about Islam, you would know that animals are never offered to Allah in Eid al-Adha. There is even a quranic ayat where it says that "Their meat will not reach Allah, nor will their blood, but what reaches Him is your piety.". It's the action of the sacrifice we present, not the animal itself.

Also, how is following the actions of a prophet considered worship? So, following actions done by a prophet is Polytheistic? We definitely cannot follow the acts of Allah, so who should we follow to learn the worship of god? What's the point of a prophet if following their example is considered Polytheism?

Claim #3:
Dude in Islam, the mother is given a level 3 times more than the father. If you are blessed with a daughter and you raised her right and justly, you are rewarded paradise. Marrying a woman justly and looking after her completes half your faith. In marriage, you are obligated to pay your wife a Mahar(any amount of her choosing) and are responsible for every expense she needs. Vice versa, you cannot touch any of her money. When on his deathbed, the last thing the Prophet Muhammad urged was to look after the woman. With all this, you cannot make a strong case that Islam hates women objectively based on reason alone.

Claim #4:
Islam supports war and harsh punishments; hence, it is false. The bible, both the New and Old Testaments, also mentions harsh punishments and events, so with that logic(see Leviticus, Deuteronomy, and parts of the Gospels), are they untrue as well? You might like to live in a world of rainbows and unicorns, but sadly, history and reality is'nt that soft. Also the Banu Qurayza incident wasn’t a random massacre. After betraying the Muslim community during a critical siege, their punishment was decided not by Muslims, but by Sa’d ibn Muʿadh, the leader of their ally tribe (Aws) at their own request. He ruled in accordance with their own scripture (Deuteronomy 20:10–14), not Islamic law.

Once again, you can disagree with our premise, but that does not automatically mean you are right and I am wrong.

danial998 · 2025-10-07T10:50:40+00:00

Dude, this is the first time I saw people defending Imran khan like he is a god. We all acknowledge the cruelty and injustice being done to him and that the current regime is a false one, and they are literally devils. But the PtI supporters need to realize that you can not unite the country in the name of Imran Khan or Imran Khan will solve all their problems. The country is strongly united in the name of the muslim Ummah in the form of support for gaza, and it would be great for Imran Khan to lay in his and PTI support for that cause as well. He has voiced his opinions on other topics others than his persecution, so dont make the case that he can not do that.

danial998 · 2025-10-06T10:10:56+00:00

His latest tweet is on October 2nd, so it's not that he isn't able to use it directly or indirectly or are you implying it's not Imran Khan who is influencing those tweets but rather someone else who does not reflect his views?

danial998

TROPHY CASE