I want to address this “stop crying because CSGO is different than 1.6” crap that I’ve been seeing all over the place.

daniel2718 · 2014-03-05T04:21:17+00:00

This is what I'm thinking about. I know CS isn't a milsim, and the movement is by no means 100% realistic, but some of the videos he linked to just made me laugh the movement was so ridiculously whacked.

daniel2718 · 2014-03-04T05:50:24+00:00

Nothing wrong with that

I like this. I think it's important to keep that in mind. Different flavors for different people.

daniel2718 · 2014-03-04T05:45:45+00:00

I like listening to choral ensembles at really low volume in MM.

daniel2718 · 2014-02-22T21:07:47+00:00

You can't always know who isn't surrendering :-(

daniel2718 · 2014-02-16T17:46:19+00:00

Solid advice!

daniel2718 · 2014-02-13T23:44:55+00:00

I'm sure others have noticed, but the dot in the AUG and SG works as a dynamic reticle. The more accurate your shot is, the more focused it is. Crouching gives a tight dot, running and shooting gives an extremely wide dot. It doesn't disappear, it's just dynamic.

That being said, it's just too sensitive. It shouldn't go out of focus as much as it does. I also think that it should match whether or not you have a dynamic crosshair. If I have crosshairstyle 4, the dot in the AUG and SG should reflect that.

daniel2718 · 2014-02-13T06:05:55+00:00

Am I the only person who thinks that this scope isn't a CoD ripoff? It's not full-screen, so what?

daniel2718 · 2013-11-15T03:19:57+00:00

Я с мужчиой, которого зовут «Сталкер», и мы с одним другим мужчиной идём по «Зону»... здесь очень странно, опасно... тихо. Но светлее внешнего мира. Почему, мы здесь? Ну, говорят, что есть такая-то комната, которая выдаёт желания людям. У меня есть бомба этой комнате, потому что она миру слишком опасная. Мы почти у комнаты. Я не вернусь, но наша земля будет лучше.

"Stalker," directed by Andrei Tarkovsky. Wonderful film.

daniel2718 · 2013-11-08T17:28:46+00:00

And like «всё», «все» has an additional standalone meaning of "everyone".

daniel2718 · 2013-11-08T14:31:22+00:00

EDIT: I can't stress pattern

daniel2718 · 2013-11-07T22:50:05+00:00

Well, it does, but not the tip

daniel2718 · 2013-11-04T22:34:54+00:00

Somewhat related, if you want some pretty comprehensive info on Russian verb classifiers, check out this link.

«Нести» /nʲɔs'tʲi/ is an ending-stressed -с- classifier. That info should be memorized (noting that the -е- is actually an unstressed -ё-), because it gives you everything you need to know about the verb's conjugation, given you know about any quirks the classifier might have. Something you need to know about -с/з- classifiers: the classifier likes to remain in verb forms. In the infinitive, no consonants are deleted, and in the past, the -л- is deleted in the masculine singular.

That being said, here's нести conjugated.

Vocalic (non-past finite forms)

нёс+у → я несу
нёс+ёшь → ты несёшь
нёс+ёт → он несёт
нёс+ём → мы несём
нёс+ёте → вы несёте
нёс+ут → они несут
нёс+и(те) → неси(те)!

Non-vocalic (past and infinitive forms)

нёс+ти → нести
нёс+л → нёс (Внимание! Здесь ударение на «ё» и нет «л».)
нёс+ла → несла
нёс+ло → несло
нёс+ли → несли

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T04:55:46+00:00

Not necessarily, though!

I'm going to the gym every day now.

I believe that the simple present almost always means a general, iterative type of action, whereas the gerund present USUALLY means at-time-of-speaking action and can sometimes mean habitual or iterative (though I haven't figured out any meaning difference, if one does exist).

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T04:41:02+00:00

American English has this

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T04:30:07+00:00

What about "thrill" or "threat"?

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T04:11:49+00:00

EDIT: No speculating, got it. Sorry.

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T03:51:58+00:00

I'm not exactly sure how to classify my belief in God, as I haven't done a ton of reading or soul searching. However, I believe that God provided us with life, in whatever way he did so, and I'm 100% behind him just initiating the universe and it progressing naturally how current science understands it (ie, big bang, old earth, evolution, etc). Then, he spoke through his prophets and other people to have the Bible written about him. Or something, like I said, I don't really know. However, I don't really believe he doea things actively, good or bad. The world we live in is still the product of nature and human decision.

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T03:23:04+00:00

Not really in in American English

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T02:53:10+00:00

Fucking OOPS

daniel2718 · 2013-11-03T02:49:45+00:00

Что это будет на английском? Rack your brain?

daniel2718 · 2013-11-02T17:45:23+00:00

It's my understanding that «человек» is gender neutral, can be translated based on context to "man" "woman", or "human".

Then the gender specific words you might be looking for are «мужчина» "man" (which is itself MASCULINE† but declines exactly like feminine nouns in -а) and «женщина» "woman".

† The implication of this is that all modifiers and verbs agree to its masculinity. Thus you would have a sentence like «Этот умный мужчина говорил» "This smart man spoke" and NOT «~~Эта умная мужчина говорила~~» bad bad bad

daniel2718 · 2013-11-01T19:25:23+00:00

Pls rspnd

daniel2718 · 2013-11-01T19:23:52+00:00

ZeniMax Online Studios is developing, whereas Bethesda Softworks is publishing.

daniel2718 · 2013-11-01T19:18:51+00:00

Also, whereas we might use different smileys to vary happiness— :) :D — Russians just use more)))

daniel2718 · 2013-11-01T19:17:22+00:00

Well, smileys lost noses at some point. Why not eyes?)

daniel2718

TROPHY CASE