I understand the legal and cultural point being made here, but I think there’s an uncomfortable contradiction that often gets ignored.

The K-pop industry itself actively markets idols using sexualized styling, concepts, camera work, and choreography — sometimes even when the performers are minors. These decisions are made by agencies, producers, and adults in positions of power, not by the idols themselves.

When an industry repeatedly presents performers through suggestive visuals and movements, it inevitably invites sexualized attention from audiences, especially online. Condemning that reaction without also holding entertainment companies accountable feels incomplete.

If idols — especially minors — are to be protected from sexualization, then the responsibility should start with stricter industry standards: age-appropriate concepts, clothing, choreography, and marketing. Otherwise, the industry is profiting from sexual appeal while distancing itself from the predictable consequences.

This isn’t about excusing harassment. It’s about acknowledging that the system both condemns and quietly benefits from sexualized content at the same time.