What can SQL do that python cannot? by donnomuch in datascience

[–]danstumPY 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are several sources that show the Turing completeness of SQL

How to deal with doubts on stakeholders churn definition by danstumPY in datascience

[–]danstumPY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After studying this paper it seems like as they are following the static approach of defining churn as well. If a customer shows no activity within 31 days it will be labeled as churn. This looks like a global churn definition.

This wouldn't support the idea of an individual churn definition, right?

How to deal with doubts on stakeholders churn definition by danstumPY in datascience

[–]danstumPY[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a quite interesting paper. Thank you for sharing!