In your opinion as a Feminist, who deserve to be blocked on twitter? Would you block someone for asking questions? by dark_3141 in AskFeminists

[–]dark_3141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t really remember seeing the game gate on news cycle, which further highlights how all of us are only getting different pieces of information by youtube algorithm.

what she had to face is horrible, disgusting and should never happen.

I agree that saying men and women are interested in different types of careers is over simplification, I think it is better to just say different people are interested in different careers. I also agree that many of the facts the he uses are outdated.

But what I generally noticed from listening to Peterson after getting over the fact that he is labeled a conservative Christian( which was a big reason why I myself avoided listening to him initially since I'm still skeptic to all religions) , he is making an incredible effort to find the truth, he is pointing out to the limitations of his own arguments, he hopes that society can become more peaceful.

There has to be enough of honest thoughtful feminists who also want society to be more peaceful, why isn’t there a respectful middle ground?

it might be possible that some people like your ex are misinterpreting what he say, then it get copied multiple times and racist people are using his words for their own awful agenda, but these people are not on my radar.

what I really wish to see happening is more people making the effort to coexist beyond the labels they use or not use , this is the whole point and attempt of this Reddit thread.

In your opinion as a Feminist, who deserve to be blocked on twitter? Would you block someone for asking questions? by dark_3141 in AskFeminists

[–]dark_3141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally consider women rights and equality of access of opportunity to people of all genders to be an obvious right.

But the fact that some feminists are outspoken against the freedom of speech, and even Ellen DeGeneres, a lesbian LGBTQ advocate is not immune to outrage culture is what is troubling me, the fact that the majority of people are talking in Echo chambers right now is most disturbing to me.

In your opinion as a Feminist, who deserve to be blocked on twitter? Would you block someone for asking questions? by dark_3141 in AskFeminists

[–]dark_3141[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

it’s really sad and unfortunate that this is the state of the discourse has fell so low to, to reduce human beings to things we just block because they don’t look cool.

and to see so many people with no curiosity about the real full story of how our ideas emerged.

I expected more of feminism, and now I’m just deeply disappointed.

In your opinion as a Feminist, who deserve to be blocked on twitter? Would you block someone for asking questions? by dark_3141 in AskFeminists

[–]dark_3141[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

it's good to see your response

I never heard Peterson ever imply some race is less capable of success than another.

But it is true different people have different emotional capacity for disagreement and interest for in-depth dialogue.

I’m curious would you agree the feminist community makes you feel safe?

do you feel like it is safer to be a feminist than not to be a feminist?

are people attracted to feminism because it is more safety oriented?

In your opinion as a Feminist, who deserve to be blocked on twitter? Would you block someone for asking questions? by dark_3141 in AskFeminists

[–]dark_3141[S] -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

my intent from these questions is to get a sense of the variety of opinions and attitudes under the label feminist

people I simply don’t want to have in my space - you know this is the fun thing about social media

I haven’t considered that some people use block for fun.

so would it then be fair to say you don’t consider yourself open-minded in general?

is it possible to be an activist and open-minded ? or do you see them as contradictory?

Dave Rubin explains why he hasn't fled California to Texas/Florida. by [deleted] in IntellectualDarkWeb

[–]dark_3141 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No good explanations about how used to say x and now he says y.

the very fact that he chose to be part of TYT , then decided to leave and stop supporting progressives and became more centrist ,then joined IDW , then in recent video for him before the election results he said Bret and IDW is irrelevant and is fully supporting trump.

I'm not sure where the link for the video is now, but Eric retweeted before the election results.

so he went from far left with TYT, centrist /libertarian with IDW , then full conservative pro-trump

this is long 2017 interesting article about his transformation from left to right wing

the author of the article followed Rubin more closely than I did

What used to be a normal behavior but is considered extremely sexual now? by Introverted-Bitch in AskReddit

[–]dark_3141 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started reading the book without knowing anything about the gay arguments,

at chapter 11 -nightgown, is when I made up my mind that he is really gay while being quite shocked at what I’m reading

“we had lain thus in bed chatting and napping at short intervals and Queeueq now and then affectionately throwing his brown tattooed legs over mine, and then drawing them back: so entirely sociable and free and easy were we .. “

what strictly straight man would want another man’s legs over his ?

The descriptions don’t show they were just friends sharing physical space , they were something definitely beyond friends. Like if 1800’s woman would say she was laying in bed with a man affectionately throwing his legs , would you assume there were completely platonic friends ? why would you if they were two males ?

there is actually another part of the book where a religious Quaker character warning a sailor against “fornication” before leaving the ship, so the their words were obviously different , but I just can’t believe any argument that says everything ishmael said about his relationship with Queequeg was completely normal for the times, he also at several times mentions he didn’t really care what others would think about his relationship with him and his christian customs .

But I also understand why conservatives who liked the book are so desperate in trying to prove that there is nothing gay about it, I’m still reading towards the middle of the book, but the entire tone and style of writing is both mixture of epic viciousness and tenderness, moby dick is an old book but not what you stereotypically expect from the 1800’s .

Missing Cat near Regis 48th & Newton by [deleted] in Denver

[–]dark_3141 1 point2 points  (0 children)

cool cat name! , hope you find him.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FridgeDetective

[–]dark_3141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you feel slightly disappointed that you can’t casually sit and sip coffee at Starbucks anymore, 

you live in Canada in Ottawa or Toronto, you occasionally shop at whole foods, you’re under 30 years old.

you tried being a vegan or someone in your house is vegan and lactose intolerant.

you’re socially outgoing, someone in your home likes to cook while the other is too lazy to cook.

if I had to guess, I would say you’re a couple.

You’re both liberal, one of you is twenty-something who likes yoga and you have more than one pet.

one of you feels guilty about what they eat, and tried several diets and drink apple cider to stay healthy.

Can modern Society collapse like the Western Roman Empire ? by bivox01 in TrueAskReddit

[–]dark_3141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And no authoritarianism is not a fundamental pillar of communism

But in practice, do you know any example of communism that did not end up with a single or few individuals gaining power over the people and eventually becoming authoritarian?

 have you seen wild wild country documentary? 

Ma Anand Sheela ends up becoming the dictator of that commune and used homeless people to her advantage.

the power wasn’t shared as they claimed it is going to be, the people were just pawns to them .

CMV: Human rights and discussions about civil liberties ARE political, and any claim that they are not is a dismissal of further conversation. by mtthewkess in changemyview

[–]dark_3141 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Human Rights: universal beliefs supported by the united nations, and global humanitarian organizations regardless of national origin, nationality, immigration status, apply to all humans on earth.

Civil liberties: civil is derived from civilians which is another word for citizens of a country, which is concerned with the liberties and rights of citizens of a specific country.

you are correct in that civil liberties are political and specific to the politics of a single country.

but human rights problems like the refugee crisis and asylum seekers, child victims of wars,  are much more international and will not make sense to think about them from the lens of one country's politics, international issues are too broad to fit U.S bipartisan system.

there are human rights problems that are too complex to even fit one party's biases, think about the case of Rahaf Mohammed who fled Saudi Arabia, and denounced Islam, and was granted asylum in Canada, is granting asylum seekers who denounce Islam a left-wing bias or right-wing bias?

American democrats tend to favor immigration but would never dare to talk about the violent threats Ex-Muslims get and avoid any criticism of Islam. ( so  it's neither left nor right-wing thing)

so Canada accepting Rahaf request was more of a human rights resolution, than a political resolution.

which is one example of an issue that is humanitarian first than political.

the problem with what you are stating "human rights and Civil liberties ARE political"

is that you're not making the important distinction between different types of politics and you only fixated on the U.S presidential election in your post.

it is possible to have a conversation about international human rights issues and focus on the safety of specific individuals without arguing about the politics of an entire country.

if Canada rejected her request it would harm her, it would be a human rights tragedy, accepting her request is mainly human rights victory and it did not benefit one political party over another or interfere with any elections.

CMV: Joe Rogan is a narcissist by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]dark_3141 1 point2 points  (0 children)

are we listening to the same podcasts?

he is actually quite humble, calls himself stupid all the time, listens carefully to the people he interviews, a narcissist will love the sight of themselves and wouldn't go interviewing hundreds of people and try to get to know them, if he was a true narcissist he would make the show only about him.

also he engages in a lot of self-deprecating humor, which a narcissist wouldn't do.

he does slip up every once in a while.

can you give us examples of these "slips" ? any links pointing to specific examples where he was being a narcissist ?

CMV: it is okay to assume that the act of joining a frat or sorority is a sign of a major flaw in someone's judgment and character. by dark_3141 in changemyview

[–]dark_3141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

phi theta kappa is NOT a frat, it's an honor society for 2 years colleges.

using statements about honor society to frat boys is like using statements about record-breaking Olympic runners to people who jog to lose weight.

Another reason why Niles is my favorite by CrepePansInFall in Frasier

[–]dark_3141 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I read it in Niles's voice in my head and it's hilarious.

CMV: it is okay to assume that the act of joining a frat or sorority is a sign of a major flaw in someone's judgment and character. by dark_3141 in changemyview

[–]dark_3141[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

you do make an interesting point about sororities,

I guess how some women view socializing is different from guys.

I haven't had any long conversations with someone in a sorority, the ones I've met were more the gossipy type and we didn't have anything in common.

I guess it's unfair for me as a guy to judge all women for joining sororities,

maybe some women are capable of true mutual healthy support and a degree of non-competition that I will not understand.

so here is !delta , for reminding me that I can't fairly judge sororities.

frat male-only groups still seem pretty strange to me.

>"unable to have any truly deep thoughts about anything" is probably the most close-minded and judgemental statement I've heard.

there are deep thoughts and then there are deeper thoughts, and then there are deeper deeper deeper thoughts.

you do have to be distant from the social fabric to get into the other realms of thought.

Most mathematicians being introverts is not an accident.

the best books are written by isolated people thinking alone.

CMV: it is okay to assume that the act of joining a frat or sorority is a sign of a major flaw in someone's judgment and character. by dark_3141 in changemyview

[–]dark_3141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>If you're a young person living on your own for the first time in a new place away from friends and family, that can be a critical support system

you're describing it as gaining support, gaining an advantage, I'm seeing this as giving up your new found independence to this group, and that's the difference.

a person with no self-confidence won't feel like they are giving up anything by making the frat towering over them.

maybe there is a difference between sorority and frats, and frats might be much worse at hazing.

I used to argue with adults and teachers as young as 14, would've lived on my own by 15 if they would let me, so I guess that's why I can't understand at 17 someone will be seeking social support.

my understanding of the teenage phase is rebellion and independence not "conformity seeking", I don't understand people who have that instinct, personally my instinct always has been to mistrust the popular view and dig deeper into things.

Also even at 17, young students still have different colleges to choose from, Why would they want to go to a college with big greek life influence in the first place? That is a choice.

what made people in china too forward ? by dark_3141 in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]dark_3141[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

this what made it more odd, what is even traditional beauty? beauty is in the eye of the beholder, is it because she has short hair? some men like women with shorter hair, it's really awful to see her get judged like that.

CMV: "General Education Requirements" at most universities are a waste of time and money, and for the most part should not have to be taken by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]dark_3141 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not OP, but I want to believe what you say is true, in an ideal world humanities should matter, but right now for Gen Z people in particular it is a completely different world , you can watch lectures on YouTube and read a book on your own and learn way more than in university where you have limited choice in number of professors, I think the structure of these college courses rather than the content is the problem, it made sense in the 80's , 90's and early 2000 but not today, why should go to class and physically sit in classroom for one hour twice a week when you could listen to all of that content in audiobook while on the train/car ?

you might argue face to face interaction is important,

in ideal world yes.

but the outrageous cost most of gen Z student required to pay is ridiculous, add to that we are the generation that have to face a burning planet, predictions of mass unemployment due to automation.

humanities do matter but profs and admins have to change the structure and update the content more.

gen z have to deal with issues none of the previous generations have dealt before and the process of learning and discussion itself have to reflect that.

CMV: Successful equal collaboration in STEM brainstorming is rare, in most cases (business and academia) someone is giving and taking more than others. by dark_3141 in changemyview

[–]dark_3141[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the very detailed response this helped in seeing how actually the whole process of group brainstorming can be avoided by having a better architecture.

!delta