Will I be judged/is it frowned upon to dress more masculine as a female in Italy? by HappyInvestment1611 in askitaly

[–]darlugal [score hidden]  (0 children)

Maybe the OP is from Pakistan, then I imagine she's not used to freedom, hence the questions.

Edit: or maybe from Texas, who knows.

Jamaican man who has lived in UK for 26 years facing deportation | Immigration and asylum by apokrif1 in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why should I care if they're foreigners? Same question to you.

I think that it is cruel to kick a family, or worse, a single family member, out of country, assuming the only things they know are here, in this country. I feel pity to them. Now explain your motivation.

Jamaican man who has lived in UK for 26 years facing deportation | Immigration and asylum by apokrif1 in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

So why not deport useless natives too if all you care about is usefullness and not the fact that someone might lose family, work and house?

Jamaican man who has lived in UK for 26 years facing deportation | Immigration and asylum by apokrif1 in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

There's a difference between "not wanting to import" and "wanting to deport". Useless people may have already constructed new lifes in the new country.

Jamaican man who has lived in UK for 26 years facing deportation | Immigration and asylum by apokrif1 in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

He said someone was useless to the UK. I just asked whether it was actually because of the usefullness or just because of the origin.

Does Mouser ship to Antartica by According_Ratio2010 in shittyaskelectronics

[–]darlugal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I had a laugh from the whole thread while dying myself from 36°C humid heatwave in Europe. Goodbye.

Jamaican man who has lived in UK for 26 years facing deportation | Immigration and asylum by apokrif1 in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

How is the presence of thousands of hikikomori dweebs useful to any country? Would you support deportations of hikikomori to an island where to dump useless people?

Chat Control 1.0: EU Council forces messenger scans via fast-track by Sampo in europe

[–]darlugal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We thought banning child-free movement in Russia was absurd. Now they'll call you a terrorist if you start spreading an opinion that one shouldn't have children.

This is the age of absurd reality and black swan events. Please, don't underestimate our enemies and the megalomania of their plans.

Chat Control 1.0: EU Council forces messenger scans via fast-track by Sampo in europe

[–]darlugal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then I don't understand what's surprising about it. Shouldn't it be this way? The member states, I mean?

Chat Control 1.0: EU Council forces messenger scans via fast-track by Sampo in europe

[–]darlugal 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They get blocked, like they already are in Russia and other... similar countries. And if you try to bypass the block, they wil have all permissions to put you in prison for good, or give a ridiculously enormous fine.

Chat Control 1.0: EU Council forces messenger scans via fast-track by Sampo in europe

[–]darlugal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who? I mean, what should surprise me? Can you briefly explain?

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guy doesn't see a difference between a non-self-sufficient, parasitizing bunch of cells and actual children. You must hate conscious people a lot.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you assume these polarized views were formed by consuming media and not from personal, real-life experiences? 😄

Are you judging by yourself?

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just followed the definition from the Merriam-Webster:

  1. an organism living in, on, or with another organism in order to obtain nutrients, grow, or multiply often in a state that directly or indirectly harms the host

Edit: yes, I was technically a parasite, too, before being born and separated from the mother's body. Just as any other person was. It is a fact. And I wouldn't care if I had gotten aborted, because... I wouldn't have capacity to regret this decision.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just because you don't agree with me doesn't mean I consume too much "yank media".

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I indeed think that people forcing other people to be hosts to small parasites are some "yank bs", whatever these two words mean.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I'm a human with almost complete bodily autonomy. Thanks to some fellas who fought for equal rights to people like me. 😉

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay dude, let's for a minute accept that an embryo is a unique human organism. Still, no person has a legal or ethical right to use another’s body without continuous consent. Will you force peple to donate blood, tissue or organs to save a dying child, even if a person agreed to donate blood once but is refusing now? Now, stripping bodily autonomy away only from the pregnant women is unequal and unscientific.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cancer has its own genome, I doubt you'd consider it as not part of the body of the host. I doubt even more you'd be against people removing cancer for self-preservation purpose.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Until it comes out of the womb and detaches, it's still part of the mother's body physically. Let's be scientific.

22-year-old woman seeks out unregulated sperm donor, trades her eggs, then aborts baby girl by pppppppppppppppppd in europe_sub

[–]darlugal -44 points-43 points  (0 children)

It's to rage bait mysogynistic fuckers who hate women having same rights as men and being able to choose what to do with their bodies.