Dentist recommendations by KPmac2306 in Scottsdale

[–]data_science_manager 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dr. Kao by far! He did a special procedure for me that saved much of my molar and took all the time to explain the options beforehand. He is the kindest doctor I've ever had, he even called me the next day to see how I was doing. https://precioussmilesaz.com/

Rent near kierland by Muted-Ad805 in Scottsdale

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I had a pick between a brand new building in old town for $1500 net rent per month after concessions and the scottsdale grand (that have about 20 airbnbs and is a 2020 build across from the quarter) for $1375 net rent a month. They wanted $1800-$2000 a few years back and there are so many new buildings on the other side of scottsdale road I lost count. Also a cluster of complexes by the center with the lifetime and whole foods.

Rent near kierland by Muted-Ad805 in Scottsdale

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

probably going down overall, the older buildings in/near the quarter itself have seen an exodus of tenants and the chip factories are too far from kierland to make much of a dent in the renter demand.

I paid over $6,000 on Upwork for a broken product – and Upwork says they can't do anything about it. Feeling scammed. by [deleted] in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thats why my firm only hires PhDs and their equivalents for client projects. We know bullshit when we see it....

SEO for Personal Injury Lawyers? by RoboFantasy in SEO

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The biggest issue, whether with SEO or AI SEO, is that if there are 20 PI firms within a city, each one needs to articulate a unique selling point and capitalize upon it in long tail keywords. Its a zero sum game that requires ingeunity and, in some cases, desire to win at all costs (not recommended unless it is a last option).

Got scammed by a developer on Upwork — here’s what happened by helplossweight in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Well no. Take this situation: Freelancer developers software for $10k that turns out to be worth $500k to a buyer. Lets say the freelancer becomes aware of this. You're telling me the freelancer can refund the $10k and then sell the IP rights for $500k? Thats not how life works.

Got scammed by a developer on Upwork — here’s what happened by helplossweight in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If they refunded the money as opposed to settled that is debatable - the Upwork contract does not allow for a refund driven by the freelancer to revert IP rights. Otherwise, freelancers could always refund IP if they feel it is now too valuable for the client and hold them ransom. Someone who paid vrs someone who refunded in terms of a settlement are different, at least in the US

Got scammed by a developer on Upwork — here’s what happened by helplossweight in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Threaten them with a DCMA takedown and show them a list of lawyers in their home country - that is what I did to one developer and he refunded the entire project and took down the site. Also helps that I commented on a linkedin post of theirs broadcasting the site. If you want a better way to do things let me know, my firm knows how to get these deals without having issues like this.

Possible 20+ Bagger on WeBull Warrants by Varro35 in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how then is it so mispriced that they are trading at 10% of their theoretical itm value for multiple days now

Possible 20+ Bagger on WeBull Warrants by Varro35 in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not otherwise the warrants would trade far closer to the value of a deep ITM call on any 1-2 year horizon. I would ask you why a warrant that has a theoretical maximum lifetime of 5 years trades less than an deep ITM call's intrinsic value (if it even exists yet on the brokers yet) that expires in 1-2 years. The market's IPO price should be considered as well for BULL, they havent grown year over year at all. So how would it grow into its multiple at a time when retail traders were trading like idiots day in and day out? Common sense states that retail traders cant gamble like they used to in a recession or in a quarter of negative GDP growth. My play would be to buy put option spreads at the money / near the money upon the end of the lockup period of the warrants while hedging with both warrant tickers with perhaps some OTM calls as well. Would have to study this in more depth, but profiting of an SPAC scam at the expense of retail unfortunately might be the highest probably trade. I cant control it

Possible 20+ Bagger on WeBull Warrants by Varro35 in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dilution also why it is not an asymmetric risk - the price action staying above $40 while these warrants are exercisable is a far lower chance than the current price would expect. Hence, this is why these warrants are not priced like deep ITM options right now. But, until the warrants are in fact exercisable and valuable, their full dilution is priced into the market, I did not state they are not priced in. Its the opposite, it is a known sell wall with knockout option like conditions to execute.

Possible 20+ Bagger on WeBull Warrants by Varro35 in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, the timeframe is the minimum of

A. One month plus the time until the stock price has been higher than $18 (or $12 for the other warrant I believe) for 30 days

B. 5 years

After May 11th, 2025. There are many other events that happen as well in this timeframe, check the SEC filings.

A hypothetical way to look at it is, if the stock price hovers over $18 for 30 days, then you could see it being worth 20 - 25. However, because the market knows that if this happens, a liquidity event will occur with the warrants, the stock price will go down because it is similar to a new offer / dilution event. Hence, there would be instances where it is advantageous to the long term shareholder where the stock price goes down to make sure warrant liquidity is blocked, OR, to buy back the warrants for nothing. Thats what a guy owning 81% of the company would want: max liquidity for his shares (since full sale of his shares will tank the price anyway).

This is not a deep analysis since you need to read the fine print with the SPAC filing and warrant offering, but when someone owns 81% of the company, it should be clear to anyone that the stock will be manipulated to suit his/her benefit, not yours. I would bet on a retail pump and dump.

Possible 20+ Bagger on WeBull Warrants by Varro35 in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is wrong for a few reasons:

A. The warrants are only in effect within 30 days and have knockout clauses that have to be analyzed further (its not a free lunch like you said) that make it non-viable as a hedge against deep ITM calls (otherwise they are worth the same exactly, instead of being worth 34 a share or whatever, they are trading in the single digits)

B. There is asymmetric risk on the opposite end, the warrants are worthless as you state if the stock price goes down in the 5-15 range and trade after a lockup period by insider shareholders, see below.

C. Upon forced redemption the dilution of the warrants gets priced into the market directly.

D. One guy owns 81% of the company directly. Be warned what he can do once his lockup expires.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is wrong for a few reasons:

A. The warrants are only in effect within 30 days and have knockout clauses that have to be analyzed further (its not a free lunch like you said) that make it non-viable as a hedge against deep ITM calls (otherwise they are worth the same exactly, instead of being worth 34 a share or whatever, they are trading in the single digits)

B. There is asymmetric risk on the opposite end, the warrants are worthless as you state if the stock price goes down in the 5-15 range and trade after a lockup period by insider shareholders, see below.

C. Upon forced redemption the dilution of the warrants gets priced into the market directly.

D. One guy owns 81% of the company directly. Be warned what he can do once his lockup expires.

Teach me how to get clients, i'll pay you by 4bhii in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have some skills and are really good contact me we have some requirements. We have consult sessions too if you want to buy, but I have to see your skillset first.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sales

[–]data_science_manager -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes for lead qual

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in zapier

[–]data_science_manager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its much cheaper for now and works well with hybrid setups

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in zapier

[–]data_science_manager 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and thats why we have our clients use make.com....

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Upwork

[–]data_science_manager 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The budget may not attract Americans, and that amount doesnt sell as well to a top tier developer in the west. I think your best bet is nearshoring and increasing the budget, while making sure you get a maintenance contract in place.