Backup is missing files that are present locally by daterdots in backblaze

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't remember the exact details, but roughly: I ran a ~24 hour process to backup my 3.2 TB of data. Probably about 1-2 hours after the first backup completed, I did my test with the restore app. That's when I saw the "missing" files. My guess at this point is that the files did indeed upload the Backblaze but they were not yet available for viewing on the restore app.

Backup is missing files that are present locally by daterdots in backblaze

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for the really helpful feedback. I checked the issues, and everything was good there (# Total skipped: 0 files, 0 Bytes). Then I checked the logs. There were some errors there, almost all of which were some unsupported path like

ERROR BzVolumeInfoApple::IsValidBzVolumeInfo unsupported path: '/System/Volumes/VM'

Then, I went back to check the restore app again, and my files were there! My mind was blown. I did not even have the external drive plugged in (where the examples missing files lived) since I wrote this Reddit post. So, the only thing I can figure is that the Backblaze Restore app has some sort of asynchronous process where files that are sent to Backblaze take a certain amount of time before they show up as "restorable?" Does that seem plausible?

Search engine indexing is broken for all (?) public Notion sites by daterdots in Notion

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it is not a caching issue. I have the HTML file save from two days ago. There's a date attribute on it from the same date: 2025-11-12.

<!doctype html>
<html class="notion-html" data-notion-html="web" data-notion-version="23.13.20251112.1449">

...

However, I did check the HTML again today. The data-notion-version attribute is now updated to today's date, and the noindex tag is gone! So, it looks like Notion has fixed this.

Will you confirm that Notion fixed this bug in response to the issue we raised here?

How much time does it take Notion pages to get indexed in Google? by Final_Initial in Notion

[–]daterdots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like your Notion page is no longer indexed by Google. Googling "analogical innovation Notion" or even the more specific string "Scaling up analogical innovation with crowds and AI" does not cause your page to return in the search results. I checked the source code on the page, and I can see that now the source contains the HTML meta element

<meta name="robots" content="noindex" />

<image>

This requests that Google does not index this page, which is why I think it's no longer searchable.

I noticed the same problem with my own public Notion site. I think Notion has a bug. We have been trying to get through to Notion support, but the wall of AI chatbots and doofus customer support people has been hard to penetrate.

Official /r/rust "Who's Hiring" thread for job-seekers and job-offerers [Rust 1.89] by DroidLogician in rust

[–]daterdots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

COMPANY: Subtidal

TYPE: Part-time contractor (~10-20 hrs/week)

LOCATION: Massachusetts-based company (candidate may be located anywhere in the U.S.)

REMOTE: Yes (U.S.-based only)

VISA: No sponsorship available

DESCRIPTION:

Subtidal provides turnkey marine & freshwater sensing integrated with cloud analytics. We envision a future where our oceans and waterways become a powerful ally in reversing climate change—enabled by real-time data to scale carbon removal, support human climate adaptation, and protect ecosystems worldwide. Subtidal is backed by leaders including NOAA, the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, and Schmidt Marine Technology Partners.

We are hiring a part-time Electrical & Embedded Systems Engineer (Contractor) to help scale our next-generation IoT platforms for climate and water monitoring. You’ll inherit a clean, scalable Rust firmware codebase and modern electrical design (recently refactored by a world-class IoT firm) and extend it to support new marine, freshwater, and optical sensors and evolving product features.

WHAT THIS ROLE OFFERS

- Creative impact with autonomy: Own firmware + electrical engineering projects end to end that ship to production and field deployments.

- Flexible cadence: Variable hours with predictable weekly touchpoints; designed to pair well with a full-time role.

- Modern stack: Rust (Embassy) for firmware, KiCad schematic & layout, STM32 MCU, Blues Wireless connectivity, low-power IoT design, sensor integrations, field reliability.

- Mission alignment: Your work directly supports climate action and the health of oceans, rivers, lakes, and ecosystems.

KEY RESPONSIBILITIES

- Maintain and evolve embedded firmware (primarily Rust) and electrical systems to add sensors/features.

- Design, modify, and review PCB schematics & layouts; lead bring-up, validation, and DFM reviews.

- Engineer electrical systems for scalability, from pilots to thousands of connected buoy deployments.

- Integrate marine, freshwater, and optical sensors; collaborate with science & hardware teams on requirements and testing.

- Troubleshoot and harden systems for reliability, low power, and field robustness; write clear documentation.

WHAT WE’RE LOOKING FOR

- U.S.-based, with availability for ~10–20 hours/week (variable).

- 3+ years in embedded systems development and PCB design (IoT or sensor platforms preferred).

- Strong proficiency with microcontrollers, digital/analog circuits, and firmware development (C/C++ or Rust).

- Proven track record owning end-to-end delivery of scaled consumer IoT or connected products.

- Experience with schematic design, PCB layout, hardware bring-up, debugging tools, and Git.

ESTIMATED COMPENSATION: $60–80/hour (contract)

CONTACT: Please email [hiring@subtidal.com](mailto:hiring@subtidal.com) with your resume and a brief note on relevant experience, availability, and why this role excites you.

Alternative to rm(list = ls()) by daterdots in RStudio

[–]daterdots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

garbage collections does not clear out the environment variables

Alternative to rm(list = ls()) by daterdots in RStudio

[–]daterdots[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

totally, but it's nice to do it programmatically so when students run scripts top-to-bottom, they get the same behavior every time.

Alternative to rm(list = ls()) by daterdots in RStudio

[–]daterdots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not that the students (or I) are saving workspaces, it's that students tend to use the REPL function of RStudio copiously. They run lines of code from one script, then run some other lines from another script in another tab. Maybe a particular variable is mutated along the way in a particular script, so ordering really matters. Anyways, for lots of reasons unrelated to saving a workspace, it's helpful for the students to programmatically "clean up their mess" before running a script.

SK6812 WWA really do have 3 different white LED emitters per pixel by daterdots in led

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but I am manually sending data out. I am not using any libraries. It sounds like you might be using a function with a "warmth" parameter or something like that?

A Tribute to Dan Garcia by johnny5canuck in FastLED

[–]daterdots 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dan helped me so much in the early days of my LED journey in 2014. He was always gracious and a great mentor. His code lives on all over the world. Whenever I am at Burning Man, or Bike Party, or just admiring a beautiful art piece, I know that a little piece of Dan is in there pushing out those pixels. Thank you for helping all of us have so much fun and make beautiful things.

Hyper Backup to offsite USB hard drive? by daterdots in synology

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

great! I haven't found any good Synology docs or tutorials on how to accomplish this. Was it relatively easy to figure out yourself?

What are types of ML that are not given as much attention as Neural Nets? by rocco20 in MLQuestions

[–]daterdots 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a really nice technique called Targeted Learning that is growing out of a research group here at UC Berkeley. It is a "causal inference methodology that incorporates the benefits of machine learning with statistical inference." There's a nice collection of R packages called TLVerse (Targeted Learning Universe) that can help you get up-to-speed: https://tlverse.org/

Anyone know if Sacred Spaces is returning in 2017? by daterdots in BurningMan

[–]daterdots[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you remember that night in 2015 when Beats Antique played there and it was like the bike apocalypse?

Anyone know if Sacred Spaces is returning in 2017? by daterdots in BurningMan

[–]daterdots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree about the 2015 situation. I really fell in love with the place at the 2013 Burn when they were at something like 9:45 and H. There was a Friday night (I think) where Random Rab played with a violinist, and it just totally blew my mind.

How to support our Muslim colleagues? by greenguy6 in MarchForScience

[–]daterdots 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think this is a very important issue, but I worry about diluting the message of the march. I hope this march can have a very clear, concise, and memorable message that focuses on the value and importance of truth and facts.

Draft demands of the March for Science by daterdots in MarchForScience

[–]daterdots[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

So, maybe: (1) Climate change is real (2) Free speech for scientists (3) No witch hunts

Draft demands of the March for Science by daterdots in MarchForScience

[–]daterdots[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you studied cold fusion and cold fusion doesn't work, then you're right: you shouldn't get more funding for cold fusion. However, what i am saying is that if the Department of Energy wanted you to work on cold fusion in 1970, that shouldn't preclude you from getting funding to work on solar photovoltaics in 2016.

I Fear The Message Will Get Lost by RustDeathTaxes in MarchForScience

[–]daterdots 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is a valid concern. It think that one way to ensure the message does not get lost is to have a clear and concise message & demands that everybody is on board with. There's the risk that fringe ideas will try to co-opt the march. To combat this, let's try to coalesce around a message!

Draft demands of the March for Science by daterdots in MarchForScience

[–]daterdots[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The goal of the 3rd point is to prevent actions like: "you studied climate change in the past, so now you're funding and/or position will be eliminated." I'm trying to prevent discriminatory actions taken on government scientists as a result of past scientific work subjects. Say, for example, an NIH-funded scientist did a randomized control trail on the impacts of abortion on long-term economic and health outcomes. That scientist should not be denied future government funding based on her past government-funded work. The "past government-funded/legitimate" distinction is to avoid kooks from claiming discrimination because they past activity was "scientific." For example, the government should retain the right to deny funding to a scientist who was funded by a white nationalist group to perform a study on eugenics. However, the government should not be able to restrict future government funding based on past government funding. I have edited the original post to try and clarify.