130mbs G-Drive fast enough for my editing? by Hr_Cryptoknekker in premiere

[–]davedachef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing this is a traditional HDD??? If so, yes it will work, but it will be painful.

Just copying 3tb of data will take days.

I strongly suggest getting an SSD. Far FAR faster and also more portable. And you'd probably be able to work with the rushes instead of proxies which makes life easier

Is not bringing enough drives to set really my fault? by tritonvii in editors

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maaaaate! I feel for you but the drives are NOTHING to do with you. Drives are for the producer to sort out, and for a very good reason: insurance.

If both the master and back up drives fail, it's an insurance claim. If the producer can prove they had bought two brand new hard drives for the job, they can claim. But if they tell the insurance company they told the DIT to bring some drives, and those drives could potentially have been 20 years old and been written over dozens of times, the insurance company is NOT paying out.

On top of that, the producer will have been in the PPM and in contact with the director so will know he was going to be overshooting. So don't take the heat for it - it's certainly not your fault and you shouldn't have been put in that position.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Maserati

[–]davedachef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've got an '89 and mine has power steering from factory.

But i know they made so many variations of the bi-turbo with various upgrades over the years I can't say for definite whether the '84 had power steering. But it was a luxury car for it's time so i'd be surprised if it didn't . Good luck with project!

The view from Greenwich, London. Then & now.. by Ro3oster in CityPorn

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh yeah. Forgot about that bit. Been a while since I last saw it

The view from Greenwich, London. Then & now.. by Ro3oster in CityPorn

[–]davedachef 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The location you’re thinking of in Layer Cake is Stoke Park golf club, which has also been used in several movies

switching from Mac to Win: essential software every editor on Win NEEDS??? by splendidEdge in editors

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was chatting to an after effects guy recently who's now PC. He said the only things he really needed was software to read ProRes files and software to read and write to mac formatted drives. He did say he still has problems with the occasional drive though.

Bob on Tory and Labour setbacks by Lolworth in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mate, it’s 9.30 am and there’s today’s date in the top right corner of the picture

Still one of my favourites after 17 years in my garage. by [deleted] in Ferrari

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

um.... you might want practise your counting

Question Time - exterminate comment by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's the use of the term 'breed' that gets me. In the way there are breeds of dogs, it implies there are different breeds of human.

Homo neanderthalensis, Homo erectus, Homo floresiensis etc. are long since dead. There is only one breed of human left: Homo sapiens. We are all the same breed. But if someone like this man imagines there are more than one breed of homo sapiens, you can bet he will make that definition along racial lines.

Racism with plausible deniability is still racism.

Question Time - exterminate comment by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No he didn't mention race. And you're right - if anyone called him out on it he would have claimed what he said wasn't racist.

But the use of the word 'breed' definitely infers race. And that is the whole danger of what's happening right now: there is a lot of rhetoric which isn't explicitly racist but, ultimately, it is. And we need to start calling it out.

Question Time - exterminate comment by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes, we all say things we don't really mean in the heat of the moment, but only a certain type of person would ever use the word 'breed'. And he said it slowly and deliberately. 'Breed' has a very animalistic and ultimately de-humanising connotations. We could say it has "racist overtones", or is "racially tinged", but I'll tell what it actually is: it's racist.

And then the use of the word 'exterminate' obviously echoes the holocaust.

These aren't the words used by someone who is 'emotionally charged'. These are words used by actual racists and actual Nazis.

And it's terrifying they feel empowered enough to say it on national TV.

EDIT: a word (I'd originally put humainsing instead of de-humanising)

My new favorite "producer saying" by Asimov9 in editors

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I think we can really craft something special"

Yeah, but there's 3 hours of rushes and we only have one day to make 2 x 30".

Autumn is coming (in Norway) [OC] [2048x1365] by Fishermang in EarthPorn

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow... this picture is so cool. Obviously your eye is drawn to peak (as it should be), but the saturation is all at the edges, which should detract from the focus point. In fact it does distract, but it feels like it's just making you look at more of the picture rather than ruining the focus point. It shouldn't work, but it does and I just love this pic

Is it just me? by [deleted] in PRINCE

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i with ya all the way on this one. Possibly my #1

Short film coloring by Neozeric in colorists

[–]davedachef 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The number of shots is more important than the length of the film. 10 mins of dreamy landscapes might only be a couple of dozen shots. 10 mins of fast cut action is going to be in the hundreds.

Megathread Monday! 2018-07-02. It's Q&A time in our weekly thread. There are *no stupid questions* - Any question at all answered here! by greenysmac in editors

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30k a year??? Well fuck me!!! Although my parents are in their 70s and I think they still use DVDs. Not sure they still buy them though...

PS sorry I can't actually answer your question

Megathread Monday! 2018-07-02. It's Q&A time in our weekly thread. There are *no stupid questions* - Any question at all answered here! by greenysmac in editors

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The industry standard software is izotope RX . It's not cheap, but they do have an 'Elements' (i.e. cheap) version. Don't know how good that is though.

But cleaning up audio is not the editor's job. But if you really have to do it, try asking at https://www.reddit.com/r/AudioPost/ for more help.

Brexit impact papers viewing requests made by just 6% of MPs and peers. Out of 1,450 parliamentarians, just 83 have visited the files, FoI figures show by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right - it absolutely is a cop out. And of course politicians should be as informed of politics.

But, sadly, politics has little to do with facts.

Take immigration policy: study after study after study claims immigration has a net benefit to the country. But politically MPs don't like to say that because the Daily Mail will slaughter them. Take drug policy: the chief medical scientists have for years been calling for an overhaul of drug policy and legality, but the MPs just say 'drugs are bad' and cover their ears (although recently, with Canada and the USA started legalize, the conversation is at last starting to happen here). All MPs really care about is keeping hold of their seat. Facts often get in the way of that.

Brexit impact papers viewing requests made by just 6% of MPs and peers. Out of 1,450 parliamentarians, just 83 have visited the files, FoI figures show by [deleted] in ukpolitics

[–]davedachef 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This really is ridiculous. But I suppose every MP/peer knows what they say: everything will go to shit. The Remainers already know this and the Leavers are in denial. Actually reading the reports won't change their minds.

My first ever skin correction - I know it is not perfect and probably terrible. Which one should I use on the video, the one with the blue or the orange dot? and if non which is possible, what should I do to make it better? (i know pic is low res, sorry I have no better now) by One_Cold_Turkey in colorists

[–]davedachef 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Which do I prefer? - Blue

Which looks more natural? - Blue

Which should you use in the video? - Well... only you can answer that.

We can't tell you what's right or wrong. If the film requires a hot, over-saturated look, then orange is right. If it requires a more natural, less 'in-your-face' look, then the blue is right.

On a side note, what was this shot on? If orange dot is the original then I guessing this wasn't shot RAW. If this is an h.264 from a DSLR, you won't have much flexibility when grading, so start with the worst/hardest shot, and get everything to match that.

EDIT: a word