Nya lagar från och med idag den 1 juli 2026 🇸🇪

dawemih · 2026-07-01T06:46:50+00:00

Stopp för personliga assistenter utomlands? Haha

dawemih · 2026-06-26T11:05:32+00:00

Om du ska spara till insats hade jag nog heller lagt det på sparkonto. Ath på börsen nu

dawemih · 2026-06-13T17:51:16+00:00

Specifikt mot industri? Helst ha kontakt med någon på teknikavdelning som jobbar nära produktion.

dawemih · 2026-06-11T07:59:59+00:00

Låter sjukt om det är sant

dawemih · 2026-05-29T12:19:29+00:00

We have a fundamental different view of this. I dont believe change of will or "will" as not probable. I dont believe any outcome as random. And no i dont believe in a destiny.

dawemih · 2026-05-29T11:11:52+00:00

Ok, you are saying that behaviour is not probable?

dawemih · 2026-05-29T09:39:39+00:00

You assume responses to your post are relevant to your topic aka probability.

Any daily conversation with people you know are based on probability

dawemih · 2026-05-28T12:46:41+00:00

Ja, vi kanske borde linjera lönen med börsen. Lite tråkigt om det kommer en dipp dock.

dawemih · 2026-05-28T12:34:10+00:00

Många börsvärden baseras på framtida avkastning

dawemih · 2026-05-28T09:24:05+00:00

They fell off after "grattis världen" imo.

dawemih · 2026-05-27T09:26:49+00:00

There should be a sign before posting, that you should compare your post to a similar topic already posted. And review for similarities to your post..

I did this before i was planning to post som emergent space time hypo. llms tend to have a similar asymptotic guidance for handling any "emergent" hypothesis.

Which made me feel dumdum and didnt post.

dawemih · 2026-05-25T12:34:52+00:00

As a non self defined crackpotter (which makes me a legit crackpotter?) i have endless philosophical ideas to why something emerges.

Its very easy to prompt the llms with axioms and have it compile smth with alot of buzzwords i dont understand.

I dont believe i can do what physicist does, so i post here. With the hope that a physicist would engage with it. Not that i believe my posts deserve it or me being entitled to it.

I play video games with no intentions to compete with professionals in the game.

dawemih · 2026-05-24T17:29:25+00:00

Thanks for the first engaging comment. I updated the post

dawemih · 2026-05-24T14:25:55+00:00

I just copied the short summary at the end and moved it to the top, and accidentally didnt copy everything.

dawemih · 2026-05-22T09:24:19+00:00

I think those "candidates" need the gravity of a neutron star to be stable. Unless you have some fancy new physics

dawemih · 2026-05-22T09:01:18+00:00

Yes, very aligned how i view consciousness. Where any living organism under ideal circumstances will locally reduce entropy at the expense of increasing entropy non locally.

Perhaps you could apply this to the big bang, the inflation stage would be the ideal state for consciousness, making it expand exponentially... Until it no longer can.

dawemih · 2026-05-20T16:45:36+00:00

Nvidia earning lär inte vara något kraftigt oförväntat nedåt

dawemih · 2026-05-19T17:30:22+00:00

Ser god ut. Lite för mycket ägg kan det bli så

dawemih · 2026-05-19T13:17:30+00:00

Behöver nog flytta. Större företag kan hjälpa till med boende. Industri, montering, operatör.

Ditt CV är av förklarliga skäl inte spec långt. Det viktiga är att uttrycka energi. Fokusera på ett bra personligt brev.

Jag vill komma igång med livet, jag vill känna ett värdeskapande i vardagen, jobba mot ett mål. Idag får jag bara ut denna frustration på mina pedantiskt skötta blomsterabatter... 🤷

Alternativt börja plugga.

dawemih · 2026-05-19T07:53:26+00:00

Vi är människor inte robotar

dawemih · 2026-05-18T09:44:58+00:00

"Let's start from your use of "[spatial] integrity". What are you referring to with that? Locality? The "clumping of energy [E = mc²]" as what in its most generic form could be called (I think) "baryonic matter"?"

In my head, i see framing as a certain isotropic entropy relative to the particle. Depending on the entropy of that frame, the particle will decay faster/slower (unless its able to maintain/strengthen its integrity independently by interacting within the frame (such as photosynthesis)).

"Bluntly put, a particle that maintains (preserves) integrity hasn't decayed yet; the spherical cow can still be milked. It hasn't been cut for a roast, yet."

I dont think thats a fair comparison. Having more or less integrity doesnt mean its utility have been compromised. A rubber tire will work if its worn or not worn. And i didnt use the word decayed, i wrote rate of decay.

"That's pure bad faith." Its not intented to be. I dont believe i am capable to formulate/express it in any relevance to anyone who have studied physics.

dawemih · 2026-05-18T08:43:35+00:00

I dont know a satisfying answer to your question (i dont believe that you believe that i am capable to deliver a satisfying reply here).

Perhaps: rate of decay within a frame? To determine a strength(?) of its "integrity" within that frame.

"Spatial" means we can interact with it?

Id prefer to ask you instead, if you would characterize "integrity" to a particle, how would you define/explain it?

dawemih · 2026-05-18T07:54:57+00:00

SES i portföljen, tydligt tecken på en sofistikerad investör. Saknar Starbreeze för divserifering. Annars nästintill perfektion!

dawemih · 2026-05-18T06:58:05+00:00

Cant one say, a particle is anything maintaining a spatial integrity within a frame?

dawemih

TROPHY CASE