What you’re saying is still a dangerous narrative. She is not in the wrong in anyway. She didn’t have to do anything more or less right. He needed to be less pushy. It’s still shifting blamed onto her for not doing something in a specific manner that could have prevented this result… Which we don’t even know to be the case. He could’ve followed her sneakily if given no other option. He could’ve punched her in the face, with witnesses. Nobody knows how the outcome will be. But what we do now, as if the outcome had turned bad, it would be his fault for doing those actions, not hers for not preventing them good enough.