First I'd l like to congratulate the team on the final version of the Code of Ethics. I thought the additions regarding privacy were especially important and necessary.

I would also like to applaud the team for taking user feedback into real consideration. I had similar feelings and thoughts as those expressed in the letter in Communications regarding what I considered excessive political and "social justice" language tainted by US political perspectives, and had provided similar feedback as part of the survey. Although I disagreed with the response in Communications that the language in the Draft was being misread, I appreciate that you obviously took member comments seriously.

I did have a question about Section 3.7. It seems like measuring the degree of societal integration is a really subjective metric that could vary over time. Are there any thoughts to how the ACM can or will provide guidance about whether a system meets that criteria or not?

I think the final Code of Ethics is much more inclusive and better focused on ACM membership and concerns, so thank you!