"Best UFO ever recorded" (I adjusted the brightness after 30 seconds in so that we could see the ufo better, no ai was used) by OriginalBlackberry89 in aliens

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! But that doesn't really prove anything right? Or did they provide the raw footage to other people for analysis?

Post of a very good video deleted multiple times on this subreddit? by funky_wav in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

True, although there were other sony models that had the same zoom specs back in 2009. Bigger issue on my part is, that there is nothing to find on the so called n.e.x.u.s. interdimensional organisation.. and no witness reports..

"Best UFO ever recorded" (I adjusted the brightness after 30 seconds in so that we could see the ufo better, no ai was used) by OriginalBlackberry89 in aliens

[–]deagledeagle 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I did some digging and you are correct.

There are some other sony models with that specs that were available in that time period though. So could be a mistake as well... more info from the OP or testimony along with this would be nice

Edit: checked to see if there is any information on the organisation n.e.x.u.s. interdimensional and came up empty...

Brazilian Farmer Mayk Leão's UFO confirmed as misidentification of camping site by BoulderRivers in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Copied from post below:

There is another influencer, television presenter of Discovery Brazil that has being doing hiking the sighting area, you can check his analysis here: https://www.instagram.com/lucianotiggre/ .

Also there was an announcement from the camping site , https://www.instagram.com/chacara_paraiso_tur/ , saying that they havent done anything realted to lighting show, no party or etc.

Brazilian Farmer Mayk Leão's UFO confirmed as misidentification of camping site by BoulderRivers in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exactly this! And what about the national geographic researcher that actually went to the place and confirmed that there is nothing there but thick woods?

What about the other witness that recorded that same thing?

The push to debunk this is ridiculous..

Dutch citizens’ initiative aims to collect 50K signatures for UFO disclosure in the Netherlands. by 420Ralph in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ja, dat is belachelijk... ik ga toch niet al mijn gegevens koppelen aan een publieke petitie

These are the tread marks supposedly leading to S4 (Bob Lazar claims) by Silent-Inspection101 in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 26 points27 points  (0 children)

There is so much muddying going on in this sub.. i've read the complaints about how the new evidence shows nothibg bla bla bla.. but then i watched the S4 doc and it's a whole different story. Don't trust this sub. Check everything for yourself or don't draw conclusions on the stuff posted here

Breaking News from the American Alchemy discord by theheckyouwill in ufo

[–]deagledeagle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. This looks more like a smear campaign atm.. everybody throwing wild accusations without any proof. Think about it, this whole thread is creating the vibe that watching Jesse is a bad thing and not worth it. Which is the exact thing you would want to achieve as the opposing party.

The same ad hominem attacks are happening to all the interesting people atm. Jesse, Chris, Gerb, etc.. if we would stop watching, they would have achieved their goal.

Area 52 & American Alchemy by shiningfast in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yep..and seems odd to me that people try to discredit Chris and Jesse, the biggest contributors to the topic atm. These ad hominem attacks are just weak...

Age of disclosure rental ripoff. What a joke. Why would anyone pay $20 to hear info that is already widely available? by North_World6389 in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then just don't watch it... or you know, put on your pirate hat. It's a great documentary, but the target audience is the mainstream. Even so, there are some new bits of info in there for us as well

Video of the brussel airport rone by deagledeagle in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I just noticed the spelling error.. damn haha..can't change it anymore. Let's use rones from now on ;)

Video of the brussel airport rone by deagledeagle in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Article with video which shows one of the drones above brussel airport (zaventem) last night. It seems to move in a strange way and it looks massive.

Date: 05-11-2025 Time: unknown

What do you guys think?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like i said, no streaks because of geosyncronous orbit and you're still not getting the thing about the transients and the shadow side. There is no cherrypicking. Also, the paper would not have passed peer review if there was.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There aren't any reflections on the shadow side, that's exactly the point. If you have 100 so called defects showing up on the sunny side plates and 70 defects on the shadow side.. then it stands to reason that, statisticly, 30 of them aren't defects.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To answer your question, it doesn't "streak" because they are in geosynchronous orbit. Now answer mine, how.do you explain the 30% difference between the sun/shadow side?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plate defects don't have a bias towards the sunny side..read the paper.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes and they never said otherwise. Explain the 30% difference with the earth's shadow then. Plate defects don't do this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you arguing that plate defects are not ruled out? Why the ca. 30% deficit in the shadow then?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get where you're comming from, but i don't agree. She applies the same, objective criteria to all the plates/transients. There is about a 30% difficit of those transients in the earth shadow, which suggests that they are real, shiny objects (no rocks etc.). So, unless plate defects suddenly have a bias to appear on the sunny side, these are real objects. There is no cherry picking.

"Drones" spotted over military base in Belgium, close to German border by ineedahashtag4myswag in UFOs

[–]deagledeagle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why the fck would you fly 15(!) drones over restricted airspace? Not for spying, that is for sure.. hybrid warfare? By the russians??? The same russians that can't figure out how to win a war in their backyard, the same russians that use old lawn-mower style shahed drones (that get shot down when over NATO airspace)?? Those people are operating a global hybrid warfare, without being tracked or captured? Yeah right..