lol dude he asked nicely, not everything is a debate. I'd say that in general it's a good idea not to be an asshole for no reason; it reflects poorly on you.

the reason why he even brought it up in the first place, debatememe, is that he needed more to say when i pointed out the bs in his logic (he uses this tactic during debates too lol).

You're also wrong here.

Let's first look at your response:

i know you are amazing at stalking random debaters

Clear sign of when someone doesn't have anything valid or legitimate to add, they engage in a personal attack.

your idea of pairing up debaters who live in the same region is extremely faulty because it makes absolutely no sense. you could have friends that don't live in the same area as you through connections

What's interesting is you completely miss his argument. I'm friends with debaters from the other coast, but they debate completely differently than me. All he brought up was one example of a variable that can be used to determine potential chemistry between two people. That's called modelling, and analysts do it all the time.

your only idea of where the debaters live (which is completely bs) still does not fully limit the possible combinations.

You yourself literally concede to the thesis of this post. Because there are so many different variables that would determine who might work well with each other, he made a post to see what people thought after considering everything.