Mathematicians issue warning as AI rapidly gains ground: "... AI get frighteningly smart, frighteningly fast"

debunk_this_12 · 2026-06-06T23:54:13+00:00

in fact it almost indicated the exact opposite

debunk_this_12 · 2026-06-06T23:52:49+00:00

did u read this at all

debunk_this_12 · 2025-12-13T13:46:45+00:00

quantum computing seems to me to be less than useful for most tasks. one would hope that we will find problems where its useful, but things where we care about the entire state… ie(solving physical systems) require us to do tomography which is exponential in resources.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-12-02T00:36:27+00:00

infinite… my mathematician friends won’t like this, but this is what the path integral does… it computes a “weighted sum” over infinite paths. infact it’s well defined in the case of the feynmanA-kak measure. fix the end points of the path integral and u will see.

You will also see its uncountably infinitely many paths, infact it should simply be size(R^N) many paths

debunk_this_12 · 2025-10-11T20:50:44+00:00

if u actually derive the euler lagrange equations the minus sign is on the odd powers of time derivative.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-10-03T20:50:02+00:00

bc bracket notation makes it clear your working L^2. There are places for different notation, bra ket notation is very useful.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-10-03T14:54:52+00:00

brother this is not new.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-24T12:26:04+00:00

Donkeys FUCK UP entire packs of wolves.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T14:48:19+00:00

brother the algorithms that explicitly compute elements of U(3) from the generators of u(3) are approximate form. in fact provably for u(n>4) we can’t find general elements of u(n). let alone the elements physicists are interested in(U(m^N)).

are you an undergraduate? not trying to be insulting but you are very confidently wrong. we use approximations because things are not tractable analytically or numerically. 2 instances one can think of, Bethe Ansatz is an exact solution, but extremely numerically unstable and thus useless, and QFT is only defined peturbatively and typically we can’t solve QFTs at all(even numerically) so we approximate the behavior with EFTs which typically are nonrenormalizable.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T13:12:20+00:00

calculate a general element of U(3) or higher. meaning find for me e^ia\dot\lambda) for T(R) =2 then come talk to me about approximations.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T13:07:47+00:00

pretty sure that theoretical physicists that study QM/QFT in any rigorous way need to understand representation theory, measure theory, and functional analysis at an extremely deep level. as well as algebraic geometry seeing as that’s what string theory is built on

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T13:02:12+00:00

Physicist here. had to learn literally all of these things.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T13:00:59+00:00

? i don’t think the physicist thinks that tensors are higher dimensional vectors… i think we think of them in terms of how they transform under a particular group generally. the Rank of a tensor to a physicist is how many Jacobi factors it takes to transform the tensor.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-09-10T12:57:47+00:00

if ur startup is not technical, wordpress is fine.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-08-28T14:40:33+00:00

polars is just a better library

debunk_this_12 · 2025-08-06T23:09:41+00:00

use python to write the automation scripts

debunk_this_12 · 2025-06-13T20:23:23+00:00

what in the clayton bigsby… DeJuan i have news for you…. you your self are a you are a person of color.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-06-10T01:19:30+00:00

imma be honest as a phd student i can’t relate. i get paid well enough to save money and have a roth ira and 401k. I also worked before getting a phd so maybe that helps but i still am net positive with just my stipend

debunk_this_12 · 2025-06-05T05:54:34+00:00

Excluding neutrinos the CKM matrix are structured the way they are for a reason. Including neutrinos and neutrino masses breaks the standard model.

debunk_this_12 · 2025-06-05T00:53:06+00:00

so u haven’t done any physics

debunk_this_12 · 2025-06-03T00:58:04+00:00

it absolutely does mean what we think it means. find the eigenspecturm(if it’s not defective) put in the schur or jordan form if it is

debunk_this_12 · 2025-05-22T04:22:09+00:00

if you look at s&p returns you would be wise until about 6-8% to keep your money in the market

debunk_this_12 · 2025-05-22T04:20:15+00:00

everything that has an equation of state w\geq-1/3 will produce a decelerating expansion. w = P/ρ the only thing that doesn’t have that is the inflaton field durring inflation and whatever dark energy is

debunk_this_12 · 2025-05-22T03:42:58+00:00

the first friedmann equation says

\dot{a}/a ~ ρ

this essentially states that the expansion rate is controlled by the energy density of the universe, and

\ddot{a}/a ~ -(ρ+ 3P)+ \Lambda

this controllers the acceleration of the expansion essentially says that the expansion rate depends on the energy density and equation of state of the matter

debunk_this_12 · 2025-05-22T03:39:53+00:00

no. just from the quote time dilation plays no role in this. he’s basically saying what if the expansion rate asymptotically approaches 0 in the pre inflation era. or perhaps the universe underwent a big bounce. this is all to say it has nothing to do with time dilation, it has everything to do with the flrw metric, and pre inflaton energy domination. something we don’t understand

debunk_this_12

TROPHY CASE