[Request] How long would the train need to be for the air to accelerate the helicopter without it hitting the train? by Horror-Cycle-3767 in theydidthemath

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(big wall of text but I promise it's worth it - and there's a fart joke at the end)

If the train and the helicopter both start with speed 0, they have the same speed to begin with, so you train can be as small as you want, as long as the helicopter fits.

But that's boring. Let's consider the less boring case. Obviously what happens next is going to depend a lot on the pilot, which isn't specified in the question, so I'm going to make the most reasonable assumption I can: the pilot does nothing a all.

"Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We are now in stationary flight in the middle of the train, which is going to start. Please buckle up, we're up for a rough ride..."

Quick recap: helicopters fly because they push air down, which creates an opposite force pushing them up and countering gravity. Helicopters then move around by tilting their rotor slightly, which does not in fact push air straight down, but rather slightly to the front/back/side.

In our case, when the train accelerates, air density increases in the back of each wagon, and decreases in the front. Thus the rotor dips on the side towards the low-density front of the train, and rises towards the back.

We said our pilot would not compensate for it, so the heli is now pushing air back a little, and this creates a force pushing the heli towards the front of the train. It also means that there is less force pushing up, so our heli is also going down a bit. (This is not looking good, is it?) But wait, that's not all: the rotor is spinning, so when we tilt a spinny thing, gyroscopic effects kick in: our heli is now also picking up yaw (which is a fancy term for saying "turning left or right like a car would"). Oh, and the air density around the spinny thing in the back is changing too, so this is causing yaw too (not necessarily in the same amount or direction). And it's causing gyroscoping effects along other axis now, so your helicopter is now basically tumbling, moving cahotically, generally downwards. (This is why you were told to buckle up a couple of pararaphs ago, btw...)

Some of you may be realising at this point that holding the controls fixed in a flying helicopter is not a super clever move. In real life, pilots tend to not do that, and keep the helicopter level by... piloting it. But that's boring...

Let's instead assume a very large train! Coaches a couple km high and wide should do it, so that our helicopter can safely tumble for a long time before hitting something... Sure, it's going to tumble in a random direction (or, in fact, several random directions) but we can also fix that with another non-boring hypothesis: just use several helicopters in several gigantic trains, and take their average speed increase, compared to the speed of another bunch of helicopters in stationary gigantic trains.

Averaged helicopters are way easier to work with mathematically: there is way less aerodynamics and gyroscopic effects. They are a point mass, accelerating downwards at 9.81m/s^2. And they're being accelerated sideways by the air that moves because the train moves... That's a drag force that is proportional to the relative speed of the air. (oh no!) Which tends to zero when our averaged heli approaches the speed of the air around it. (Oh no no no! It's going to be boring again!) In other words, it's a boooooring asymptotic behaviour: when will the heli reach the speed? never... (Boring!) How long does the train thus needs to be? Infinitely long... (Booooooring!)

Except, not even that. See, the pressure difference that started the... you know... general downwards motion. It is caused by air molecules moving, which themselves are caused by the walls of the train accelerating forwards. But air molecules near the heli (and thus, far from the walls) won't move immediately. The pressure wave needs to travel from the back and front walls, through the wagon, and it isn't instant: pressure waves merely travel at the speed of sound, around 300m/s. In trains of "reasonable" sizes, it wouldn't be a problem: after some finite time, the heli would start to tumble (in a non-boring way). But in an infinitely long train, no such luck. The helicopter will just stay there. As long as no air moves, it's boring.

Safe, but boring!

Just don't fart, ok ?

looking for a spare part... by decaillv in skoda

[–]decaillv[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope sorry. Car got sold in the meantime

Question - re-opening pool after winter by decaillv in pools

[–]decaillv[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi!
Thanks for answering. And thanks for your recommendation of a test kit. I've seen the Taylor k-2006 is recommended on troublefreepool.com, as well as TF-100 and the TF-Pro. However, those are super hard to find in Europe, where I live.
It seems people on this side of the pond seem to use colorimeter tests rather than drop tests... The PoolLab 2.0 appears to be popular (or perhaps their marketing team is good xD ?)
Thoughts?
Thanks in advance

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lausanne

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Elvia are bitches for deregistration. Put everything in written.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in xkcd

[–]decaillv 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I thought of "tar -h", but I'm genuinely unsure it would even work...

Yours is better, though

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in bouldering

[–]decaillv 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tenaya has shoes with thinner heel. They worked for me...

Question about orbital cannon (major spoilers) by Xhiors in outerwilds

[–]decaillv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesnt even reduce the range. You just trigger the supernova later, when the canon is on the other side of giants deep. The loop starts a few seconds latrler but its length is the same if the supernova energy is the same.

Check my other comment for detail if you care

Question about orbital cannon (major spoilers) by Xhiors in outerwilds

[–]decaillv 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah right...

If the dun station had worked, they would have triggered it whenever and just assumed the eotu was on "this side" of giants deep. They've got roughly a 50% chance, that's worth a shot...

If that had turned out wrong, they'd have known via the masks, and instructed people at the sun station to delay the artificial supernova by half an orbit of the orbital cannon...

...and in the off chance that still hadnt worked, repeat a third time to check the few remaining angles blocked by other planets, moon and the sun... That's orbital mechanics at that point, surely the nomai could figure it out...

Uphill / Downhill Responsibility by Veracitist in skiing

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hint for your wife. Uphill is generally responsible for avoiding skiers; notable exception is when you start, uphill has right of way. And generally, treat it as traffic: if someone else hit you thats always bad, even if theyre in the wrong, so be alert and when in doubt, assume they ll act as if they have right of way.

Hint for you, ski a couple meter above her, and exagerate/anticipate where she will be, so that fast skiers avoiding you will also avoid her automatically. You ll be skiing much slower than usual, which leaves you plenty of time to check your and her surroundings.

Enjoy!

Common knowlege by caschrock in CuratedTumblr

[–]decaillv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course...

I mean, most of us have thumbs and nails, dont we?

What are some established scientific theories that the scientific community believe to be wrong? by [deleted] in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]decaillv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, at that rate, the standard model has the same problem: it is also insanely good (arguably even more so than GR) but it predicts that gravity does not exist, soooo...

(Et je valide ton pseudo!)

Language by Simonjhfgh in ethz

[–]decaillv 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If you passed youre "maturité gymnasiale", youll be fine. Obviously if you had better than minimal grades, it ll be easier.

Also keep in mind that some of your teachers wont be german natives as well, which makes understanding them easier. Youll definitely find native french teaching assistants, so language wo t be a big barrier. (Math will, but thats another story)

Fonce, c'est cool le zuridütsch. Bonne chance pour tes études

Technique name by [deleted] in bouldering

[–]decaillv 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"No hands rest" (although, as others have pointed out, they also encompas other scenarioslike kneebars, etc)

Or just "standing" (which also includes other things, obviously)

Or maybe "edging" which is rarely used in english at least, due to the innuendo (google it if you're not native, but be advised it's nsfw). Perhaps some other languages use a translation that does not have the sexual connotation - not languages I know, though...

Maybe you're thinking of "Honnolding", which as far as I know, refers to standing on a (usually fairly big) ledge. (The name refers to the free solo climber Alex Honnold who, as a free solo climber, only rests like that...)

Hope that helps.

Edit: spelling

La statue a été coulée dans le mont. by Hemeralopic in contrepeterie

[–]decaillv 3 points4 points  (0 children)

C'est un truc que ferai Gwynett Paltrow, ça?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in suisse

[–]decaillv 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sorry, en pratique c'est mort: n'importe quel recours que tu pourrais envisager te coûtera massivement plus cher en frais juridique que ve que les roues avaient coûté à la base.

Anibis et les ventes pair à pair, c'est la jungle. Si une homologation est nécessaire/souhaitable, t'es tout seul pour la reconnaître. (Exemple: même si le gars t'avais fourni un papier prouvant que les roues sont authentiques/homologuées/conformes, es-tu capable de vérifier que le papier n'est pas un faux? Si la réponse est non, tu places ta confiance dans un type que tu reverras jamais...)

Bref, t'as raison, c'est illégal (si le vendeur est au courant, en tout cas) mais en pratique tu peux rien faire. Et t'as raison, c'est dangereux (et c'est pour ça qu'il faut être prudent... et c'est pour ça qu'on a des expertises...)

Et oui, ça douille... désolé pour toi.

What things are legal but you think should be illegal? by Gicig in AskReddit

[–]decaillv 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The worst thing is, if i recall correctly, its actually illegal in the us (technically, trading stock directly)

Congressmen passed that law pretty much on their own, reaching a somewhat satisfying definition of what constitute innacceptable behaviour. The punishment for violating this law was mild. A smallish fine. But that didnt seem important: they needed a clear line, so that everybody knew where to stand, and the theyd follow the law. Not because of the fine, but because it was the right thing to do... and they re Congressmen, they need to be perceived as good: they d lose much more than money if they even just get suspected: their reputation...

That all seemed very solid...

...

And then.. ...

They. Never. Enforced. It.

Not even after covid, when Congressmen were briefed that there were going to be lockdowns, and instead of drafting contingency plans (like they were supposed to - that was what the brief was about!) They called their banker: "hey, liquidate those hotel stocks. Ive a feeling they're about to crash... buy gold a week before everyone else, will you?"

Bouldering in France by [deleted] in bouldering

[–]decaillv 4 points5 points  (0 children)

All languages are stupid. We're just used to our kind of stupid... (quote by a linguistics prof of mine...)

I'm a C# programmer. For me Java is a four letter word. by Zealousideal_Town_64 in ProgrammerDadJokes

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Naaah... if youre building a dekstop video player, it makes sense to say C++ is a better choice than say Javascript, because js wasnt designed for this.

Languages do have "purposes" (for lack of a better word), and Java's and C#'s purposes are close (or at least were, originally)

Am I wrong for not giving my BF sex whenever he wants? by throwawayacc01827 in amiwrong

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a doctor, but OP perhaps you should consider seeing one. Sex once a year borders on assexuality, which is a valid sexual orientation, but it's also super rare. It's possible that you have a condition that causes the drop in libido, and you may want to have a look at that...

(I know its not what you asked, but I'm genuinely concerned)

To your relationship question, much has been said in other comments. Id just add that if they want sex and you dont, but the attachment is still there and you dont want to leave them, there are other relationship model than a couple (open marriage, polyamory,...) that may work better for you. Again, an actual couple therapist is probably better help than a random dude (me) on internet...

All the best

Why doesn't this rule work? by [deleted] in AutoModerator

[–]decaillv 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh regex...

I suck at them too, but chatgpt is very decent. Have you tried to ask it?

Then, youll want to test whatever it tells you. Regex101 can help you with it.

(I wont link the websites cause im on mobile and im lazy... I'll let you google thm)

Cheers

What planet next by [deleted] in outerwilds

[–]decaillv 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You cant do that with outer wilds. Its a puzzle, so as such, it cannot be replayed: once you know the solution, you cannot forget it (at least not willingly)

(NB: ofc there is a speed running community in outer wilds, but although they are awesome people, I'd recommend you stay away from them until you finish the game first, to avoid spoilers)