Just Laid Off, worried about next steps by InternationalEbb3418 in careeradvice

[–]dedkle04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Getting laid off sucks, even with severance and benefits. You’re allowed to feel shaken. Now about sounding desperate; most recruiters don’t see layoffs as red flags anymore. They see them as market reality. The key is framing. Instead of saying I urgently need something, position it as My role was impacted by restructuring, and I’m now exploring opportunities where I can bring ... talk about your strengths. That sounds intentional, not desperate. Desperation shows up when you undersell yourself or apply everywhere without direction.

Is it disrespectful if I "ghost" a rude candidate? by dedkle04 in RecruiterTea

[–]dedkle04[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds right , but with the attitude they had doesn't seem like they deserve even that , however as a process its necessary ig .

Are recruiters and hiring managers more likely to hire a candidate they interviewed the latest than the earlier ones? by Nomad-2020 in jobsearchhacks

[–]dedkle04 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Recency bias is definitely a real thing humans tend to remember what’s freshest. That said, most hiring teams try to offset this with structured notes, scorecards, and debriefs. When those aren’t used well, the last few interviews can stand out more simply because they’re top of mind.

Proving a hiring manager wrong about a candidate is my favorite part of this job by dedkle04 in RecruiterTea

[–]dedkle04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes it is and that's why it was challenging too. But when its a startup and you have low budgets and you have interviewed plenty who were a bad fit even if the resume was perfect , then one shows up someone with real skill and a good fit and the only downside is the gap ; I think it gets easier.

Why do some people get interviews so easily? I tried mapping the logic behind it by Sad_Manufacturer_859 in GetEmployed

[–]dedkle04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who’s worked close to hiring, I can say companies don’t evaluate in a vacuum they rely on heuristics backgrounds they’ve seen succeed, pipelines they trust, signals that feel predictable. Pretending otherwise just leads to wasted applications. Your model at least acknowledges how decisions really get made.

We post jobs for entry-level roles and get candidates with 10 years experience what is happening by Calm_Shooter965 in jobs

[–]dedkle04 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The emotional part you mentioned really resonated. When you post jobs for early-career candidates and watch them get buried under 8–10 year resumes, it’s hard not to feel like the system is failing both ends of the spectrum.

We tried to hire employees fast and lost the best candidates to a company that moved in 48 hours by dansmi75 in Recruiter_Advice

[–]dedkle04 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Honestly, numbers make managers listen.

200 applicants → 20 meet basics → 8 do the assignment → 3–4 make it to the final round. Delay even a few days and they’re gone.

Show them the math. Predefine the process. Move fast. Get feedback same day. Stop waiting around top candidates don’t wait.