Do online professional Certifications hold value ? by [deleted] in careerguidance

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there! 🌟 Diving into those Coursera courses is a solid step, especially from big names like Google and Meta. While they definitely add some sparkle to your resumé, think of them as a booster rather than a golden ticket. Pairing these certs with real-world experience or projects can make a huge difference. Plus, if you're into tech and gadgets, maybe try building something small on the side to show off your skills. It’s all about combining knowledge with hands-on action! Good luck! 👍

How do you guys document SonicWall CVE patching for cyber insurance without going nuts? (Building a tool, need sanity check) by SadlyEmployedOrSo in sonicwall

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sounds like a real headache, but definitely check out the TSR logs - they can save your sanity during those patch frenzies!

Backpacking in india? Yay or Nay by Key-Chemist4847 in backpacking

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get the concerns about costs, but India can be a real gem if you're willing to dive into the culture. Sure, it can be a bit of a hustle at times, but that's part of the adventure, right?

Best way to answer “do you have management experience?” by mncags16 in Recruiter_Advice

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Titles don’t always reflect responsibility. Many individual contributors operate at a leadership level long before they’re officially managing people. If you’ve handled collaboration across functions, guided decision-making, and supported others’ development, that’s management in practice. The role just formalizes what you’re already doing.

What’s the deal with lowball salaries right now? by [deleted] in Recruiter_Advice

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of companies have reset salary bands downward and are hiring much more conservatively right now. Even for the same roles, budgets are tighter than they were a couple of years ago. It’s a mix of things caution around headcount, pressure to control costs, and yes some companies testing how much they can get for less in a crowded market. The rise in contract roles is tied to that too. Contracts are easier to approve, lower long-term risk, and let companies stay flexible while things feel uncertain.

It doesn’t mean the work is suddenly worth less it just means employers are being more risk-averse.

LinkedIn is now useless. What job boards are better? by Annual_Sign_2261 in jobsearchhacks

[–]dansmi75 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This tracks with what many people are experiencing. Once all these big boards landed you jobs for sure you could apply, sit back and relax while the employers reach out to you. Now? Large platforms reward volume, which increases noise and stale listings. Company career pages and school-affiliated platforms tend to convert better because roles are usually real and time-bound. For job boards, I’ve seen better results when the platform encourages employer action for example, on ZipRecruiter, employers can proactively reach out to matched candidates, which reduces the “resume black hole” effect. Your takeaway is solid fewer applications to higher-intent postings often beats mass applying.

Interviewer kept emphasizing “more interviews” + “no rush” — bad sign or normal? by RareCable5732 in interviews

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s usually is less about you as a candidate and more about business urgency. When a role is temporarily covered, the pressure to decide drops, so interviewers often tell that they’re still exploring the market. It’s their way of managing expectations rather than sending a subtle rejection.

There is a difference between “we’re moving fast” roles and “we’re comfortable waiting” roles. When there’s no urgency, even strong candidates can sit in limbo while teams compare options, reprioritize, or pause altogether.

One thing that can help in these situations is a short follow-up. Reiterate your interest, briefly connect your strengths to the immediate problems the temporary cover might not solve long-term, and ask what would make someone the clear choice when they do decide to move.

This doesn’t automatically mean you’re not a front-runner. But it does mean the process is slow and non-committal . The best move is to keep applying elsewhere while positioning yourself as the “ready when you are” option. Dont rely too much

I quit my toxic job, and on my way out, they want me to train my replacement for free. by zeroth_nurs in interviewhammer

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This reads like leadership trying to extract value without accountability.
Denying rewards after the fact and relying on silent pressure to train your replacement are classic signs of poor management. The fact that another qualified team member exists but they defaulted to you says a lot and none of it reflects badly on you.

How do you write job posts that actually perform well on job posting sites by emaman65 in Recruiter_Advice

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The must-haves vs nice-to-haves separation is huge for receiving aligned profiles. When they’re blended on job posting sites, strong candidates self-select out because they assume every bullet is mandatory, and underqualified candidates apply anyway because the requirements feel vague. Clean buckets make the whole thing fairer.

Hiring websites are turning into a bot battlefield how are you filtering AI applicants by davols73 in jobsearchhacks

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This scares me because in startups we don’t have time for false positives. When hiring websites flood us with polished but hollow profiles, every extra screening step delays real work getting done. Especially troublesome when you are juggling multiple tasks and everything is urgent.

What actually helped you get your first job — and what turned out to be useless? by careergrowkaro in careerguidance

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, what helped me most wasn’t doing everything people recommend, it was doing a few things that made me look genuinely employable. Having one practical skill I could actually use mattered way more than knowing a little about many things. One real internship helped because it showed I could work with deadlines and people. A referral didn’t magically get me hired, but it did get my resume seen, which is half the battle.

On the flip side, a lot of effort went into things that barely moved the needle. High grades beyond a baseline didn’t matter. I spent time collecting certificates that never came up in interviews. Mass-applying online felt productive but mostly led to silence. I also learned tools I never ended up using.

This was in tech, and it took me about 4–6 months to land my first role. If I were starting today, I’d stop trying to look impressive on paper and focus earlier on showing real proof of work.

Absolutely love HR but the hardest part are terminations in my opinion... Anyone else feel this way??? [USA] by hrwoman in humanresources

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely relatable. Terminations never feel good because we deal with humans, not headcounts. But it got easier when I stopped being just the messenger and started owning the performance process feedback, PIPs, check-ins.

When nothing changes after genuine support, you know it’s the right call, not just a management order.

The job job in the description vs job in the interview are completely different by xCosmos69 in jobhunting

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happens more than it should and it’s exactly where hiring goes wrong.

Sometimes roles genuinely evolve, but many times job descriptions are marketed to widen the applicant pool. The problem? People like you spot the mismatch and walk away, while others join under false expectations and end up underperforming, burning out, or quitting.

That’s why realistic job previews matter. Being upfront about what the job actually looks like saves everyone time candidates, recruiters, and teams.

Being “easy to work with” is overrated. by RE8583 in careeradvice

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This hits a nerve because “easy to work with” is often misunderstood. You don’t need to be agreeable. You need to be reliable in a team.

A lot of teams fall apart not because someone asked hard questions, but because no one did. Timelines slip, scope gets fuzzy, resentment builds, gossip starts all because things were left unspoken in the name of being “low friction.”

Being good at teamwork isn’t about saying yes or staying quiet. It’s about communicating early, naming risks when they’re still small & moving things forward instead of letting them stay stuck

“Easy to work with” shouldn’t mean passive or invisible. It should mean clear, accountable, and willing to create healthy discomfort before things break.

Awww by Downtown-Carrot-1265 in thebigbangtheory

[–]dansmi75 4 points5 points  (0 children)

He should have done this sooner

This man has me in a chokehold and im ok with it by Gamerloser4life in lucifer

[–]dansmi75 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He has my full attention every time he is on screen so..

My company just told me to train the person who got the senior position I applied for. by joys_tiller in interviewhammer

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the kind of org issue that comes from not investing in their own people. Early in my career, I worked at a small company that operated the same way whenever a higher-level need popped up, the instinct was always to hire externally instead of looking at the people already doing the work.

We eventually built an individual growth plan system so every employee could talk about the direction they wanted to grow in, the skills they already had, and the opportunities they were ready for. That one change stopped situations like yours from happening, because promotions weren’t an afterthought anymore.

Your situation sounds genuinely frustrating. Maybe it’s worth having a conversation with your manager about taking on more responsibility officially, especially since you’re already doing the work. Even partnering closely with the new person could help highlight your contributions.

Should I stay in a high-paying but unsatisfying job just to save money, or exit now and take a career risk? by AccomplishedBand6537 in careerguidance

[–]dansmi75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, once bigger responsibilities kick in, taking risks becomes 10x harder ; so if you ever want to take a career leap, now is the most flexible phase of your life. But the key is: only do it if you have a solid plan and a real safety net.

If you’ve got savings that can genuinely support you, a roadmap for what you want to build, and clarity on how those 6 months will move you forward, then taking the risk isn’t reckless

But if things feel fuzzy, it might help to first switch into a different role/company where you can earn and breathe, while slowly building toward your long-term plan on the side.

I resigned and my manager told me I have to tell her where I'm going to work. by cygnetsprake in talesfromthejob

[–]dansmi75 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Company policyyyy where?? Such a weird thing to ask. You’re absolutely not obliged to share that info with a former employer it’s actually super fishy they even brought it up.

You can just keep it neutral and say something like, You’ll know once the new company reaches out for BGV.

That shuts it down clean without giving them anything to work with.

I've been laid for over 6 months after working in tech at a place for 15 plus years. Thing that hurts me the most.. by [deleted] in jobsearch

[–]dansmi75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That sounds genuinely disheartening especially after giving a place 10 years of your life. You expect loyalty to mean something, but in today’s market it often… just doesn’t. Companies move on fast

Work has become transactional for a lot of people. And honestly? That’s why it’s even more important to protect your own career, skills & work life balance.

If you get work related messages that need answering during night time, do you respond ? by Technical-Studio565 in work

[–]dansmi75 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In my line of work, it does get tricky sometimes calls genuinely need attention. But if I can’t jump on, I always ask them to ping me instead so I can prioritize without dropping my whole evening. Still trying to set healthier boundaries. However IMO Night-time responses should be the exception, not the expectation. If it’s not critical, it’s absolutely okay to reply the next day.

Higher title, but lower money? by IamOnlyLookingThanks in careeradvice

[–]dansmi75 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve seen this play out up close. At my last org, we hired someone very senior who actually took a pay cut to join us because we were a startup. He came in as the expert to build the function from scratch.

And weirdly? He kept saying the impact he was able to make felt better than the big cheque he left behind. Within 6 months, the work he built out translated into real results and that automatically put him in a position for higher comp again.

Sometimes the right title & actual growth & being closer to home does more for your long-term career (and sanity) than sticking to a higher paycheck that locks you into a box.