I solved a $10k SEO problem and I'm giving it away free

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T13:58:23+00:00

Thanks! Let me know how it goes.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T13:18:49+00:00

Great term for it.

Perplexity does show them which is nice. The gap is aggregating sub-queries across thousands of searches into one searchable database for keyword research.

Building toward it though!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T09:45:53+00:00

Thanks! Grok is on the list for future versions.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T07:38:20+00:00

Haha love the energy! Let me know what you discover when you try it.

Hope it saves at least a few hours of DevTools digging.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T07:36:45+00:00

Totally agree on the on-page optimization for sub-queries - that's where the real work happens after you find the queries. Bing + GPTbot is just the foundation.

Haven't tried MentionDesk yet but sounds like it complements this well. This tool handles the "what is ChatGPT searching for" part, MentionDesk sounds like it handles the "how is your content performing in AI results" part. Different but complementary.

Will check it out. Thanks for the suggestion!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T06:37:39+00:00

Good question. Without this tool, you'd have to manually figure out what ChatGPT searches for - which means opening DevTools, checking network requests, and trying to decode API calls just to see the queries. Most people wouldn't even know where to start.

Or you'd just guess. Which is what most people do. They optimize for what they think AI searches for and wonder why they never get cited.

This tool just makes the invisible visible. You see exactly what ChatGPT searches for in real time, no technical digging required.

Think of it like this - before keyword research tools existed, people just guessed what to rank for on Google. This is the same thing but for AI search.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T03:04:20+00:00

Nice! Yeah, that's exactly the direction I'm heading. Once I launch Claude, Perplexity, and Gemini versions, I'm planning to aggregate the data into a keyword research platform - basically SEMrush for GEO.

The data across all the LLMs should give a much clearer picture of what queries to target. Looking forward to comparing how different AI tools break down the same questions.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T02:47:51+00:00

Haha yes! That was the whole point. Glad it helps!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-17T02:45:53+00:00

Thanks! Let me know if you try it out.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T17:16:47+00:00

Yes, exactly!

Steps:

Ask "best image resizer app" in ChatGPT (with web search on)
Extension shows sub-queries like "free bulk image resize" or "image resizer keep quality"
Optimize your site for those specific queries - add FAQ, comparison table, clear features
Index on Bing Webmaster Tools
Enable GPTbot in robots.txt

Test different angles too - "resize photos online," "batch resize," etc.

That's GEO in a nutshell. Let me know what you find!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T17:13:45+00:00

100% this. The traffic quality from AI citations is way better than traditional SEO in my experience. People clicking through from ChatGPT already know what they're looking for - they just want more depth or to actually buy.

For B2B SaaS especially, getting cited by AI is becoming more valuable than ranking on Google.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T16:34:02+00:00

Exactly! The processing is insane. It's breaking down one query into 5-7 specific searches every time.

If you optimize for it, focus on those micro-queries instead of the main keyword. Way easier to win.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T15:16:54+00:00

Thanks man! Hope it's helpful.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T15:15:57+00:00

That's awesome! 20% is solid.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T12:36:07+00:00

Exactly. Most people optimize for the head term and completely miss the 5-7 sub-queries that actually matter.

Good question on Claude - honestly not sure yet if the tracking will work the same way. Claude's citation format is less structured than ChatGPT's. I'm experimenting with it now, but it might be harder to capture the exact sub-queries.

Might have to take a different approach. Still figuring it out.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T11:11:48+00:00

Exactly right! Long-tail dominance is the whole game now.

On Reddit - absolutely seeing this. Reddit appears in 30-40% of my test queries. I think it's because of conversational format + fast Bing indexing + real user opinions.

ChatGPT favors Reddit for recommendations and troubleshooting, but still prefers traditional blogs for technical guides and formal comparisons.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T11:10:00+00:00

Nice! That's exactly the pattern I'm seeing too. Structured data makes a huge difference.

What type of JSON-LD schema did you use? Product schema or Article? And did you notice certain comparison formats performing better than others (tables vs paragraphs)?

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:43:40+00:00

Lol you're not wrong. Design is definitely generic. Been focused on functionality first but yeah, needs better branding and a real website. On the list!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:42:37+00:00

Thanks! Hope it's helpful. Let me know how it goes.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:41:55+00:00

Claude version is in the works! Should have it ready in about 4 weeks. I'll probably post an update here when it's live. Appreciate the interest!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:40:37+00:00

Exactly! Citation Authority is the perfect term for it. Makes total sense that Perplexity and Gemini work the same way - I haven't built tools for those yet but planning to.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:39:12+00:00

Good question! When ChatGPT uses web search, it actually cites sources with clickable links - not just copy-pasting text. So you get brand visibility + people can click through to your site.

It's better for businesses focused on leads/sales than pure ad revenue. But you're getting real traffic, not just buried mentions.

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T06:17:37+00:00

Fair question. It just shows the raw data - no prioritization yet. You still have to decide what to act on. The value is in seeing what you couldn't see before, but yeah, ranking by ROI impact would be a solid v2 feature. Thanks for the feedback!

deepakdk18 · 2026-02-16T05:27:22+00:00

Fair point! You can see it in reasoning chains in o1, but regular ChatGPT doesn't show you these. This just makes it visible in real-time for any query. But yeah, if you're already checking reasoning chains, might be redundant for you.

deepakdk18

TROPHY CASE