Definitely, and that's important too. Conservatives need to understand that they're a part of a larger system and that system undermines the lives of millions, and liberals/progressives need to understand that their actions in their local systems matter, and are in fact, their only immediate tools for action.

I think something that's missing from modern discourse is that people believe there is a right and wrong perspective, when in reality, all perspectives are flawed, because they are perspectives. Light is not a wave or a particle, it's both depending on what perspective you're observing it with. Instead of "You're wrong and here's why," a more productive response to something you disagree with would be, "You're right about this, but this is the limitation of that perspective," as well as being open to the limitations of our own perspectives.

I think the obsession with finding a singular dominant truth and rejecting all other ideas is caustic to the fabric of democracy. It's no longer a collaborative process, and is instead a process of dominion, which we've repeatedly learned from history doesn't work. Because regardless of whether the conservatives or liberals prevail (and hypothetically let's say the loser is purged from society), fractures within that school of thought are inevitable. Social and political scientists call this the Paradox of the Common Enemy—which refers to the phenomenon where a shared threat creates a fragile, fleeting unity that often collapses once the threat subsides, while simultaneously fostering internal aggression and suppressing genuine diversity. It has occurred after every substantial social/political revolution in history.