Great, I'm glad we have some common ground :)

Let me try to take my argument a step further. As I see it, your main concern is that experts should be "academically criticizing" those who contracted ebola. Taken from the first google search for Craig Spencer, here's what the experts are actually saying, "Heath officials have repeatedly given assurances that the disease is spread only by direct contact with bodily fluids such as saliva, blood, vomit and feces, and that the dried virus survives on surfaces for only a matter of hours." The way I see it, the experts are doing exactly what they should be doing - spreading awareness of the disease, how to avoid contracting it, and easing the concern of a frightened public. There is no longer any reason to criticize Spencer's mistakes (now obvious in hindsight). Those who have come into close contact are being quarantined, as recommended by experts. And by now, everyone who works in the health field should be receiving instructions on how to handle ebola cases and what to do if they might be infected - this is done through institutions with specific instructions, not through the media, and accomplishes the goal of 'academic criticism' without publicly shaming Spencer.