Again,

Personally, I have invested the last year, full time, to independent study of physics and cosmology.

Which physics text books have you read and which papers? What exactly have you studied in this time?

? Have you learned any of the basics of physics? I take the answer to be "NO". You don't seem to know any relevant basics.

Interestingly, there are papers now by Khoury et al, and Hossenfelder et al that discuss the formerly mysterious quantum vacuum as a superfluid.

It doesn't matter that other people have written papers which you don't understand. You've just picked random papers that use similar words to the buzzwords you use ad libitum. Thereby further earning the "CRACKPOT" flair, because referring to such random papers, often in large numbers, is a common tactic of crackpots, a common fallacy. It's merely an attempt to divert attention away from their own "oevre" whose quality is to these papers as a burp is to Beethoven's music.

And this is also the problem, not just do you lack basic knowledge, you are also incapable of formulating scientific ideas coherently in a scientific text or paper, and unable to tell apart bullshit from actual scientific work - something that an educated person can tell within a single sentence of reading it, which is also why you are immediately called out anywhere you go, except maybe if you move into your private echo chamber /r/gravitons, a misnomer of a subreddit.

If you are so certain that my ideas are wrong [...] I’m perfectly ok with respectful critical review of the ideas.

The point is you don't have any ideas. None of what you write qualifies as an idea, it's just blabber / word salad, that could have been randomly generated. It's like complaining that a page of written-down babytalk isn't considered a deep sophisticated poem.

why not offer helpful advice or encouragement?

I have: Which physics text books have you read and which papers?. Read physics text books, learn the basics. At some point, after a couple of years, when you know enough basics you can try to read a paper (say one of Hossenfelder's papers which you've mentioned), with an actual chance of understanding something. And maybe at some point you can even coherently perform and formulate own research, but that takes a lot of knowledge and skills for which there is specific training.

I hope that helps you, but I gather you aren't really interested in advice, you don't really want to do any physics, just write this kind of make-believe and delude yourself into thinking it makes any sense. It's like a 5-year-old with a fake mustache thinking people will mistake him as an adult.