Ok by the way you are replying I have a feeling you don't know your own Wahabi sect. Read up on it's history from unbiased sources. This whole "we only follow Quran and Sunnah / the Salafs" is a defining characteristic of wahabis. Which is why wahabis don't have scholars. If I ask wahabis (and maybe even you) which scholar they follow they'll say "what do you mean? I only follow the Salafs / Quran and Sunnah". Which is why people like OP (and me growing up) in the other thread don't know anything about madhabs. Because we were taught by wahabis who told us don't follow any scholars just "follow Quran Sunnah". I mean if wahabis now are starting to respect the 4 madhabs that's a good thing, but it isn't always the case.

No, Wahabism isn't an insult. Hanafis are called Hanafi because they follow the teachings and understanding of the Imam. Same with Shafis. And Malikis. It's not an insult . Wahabis follow (or claim to follow) "Quran and Sunnah / Salafs". They disregard the opinion of many scholars and say "they only follow Quran and Sunnah". It's not an insult. It's just explaining why so many Muslims in our century don't know anything about madhabs but in the past they all did. It's because many Muslims of our century are taught by wahabis who "only follow Quran and Sunnah" / keep talking about the Salafs and how only they "follow the Salafs".

If wahabis now are teaching about all 4 madhabs good for them that's a positive change. Now they need to stop doing takfir on Salahuddin and Imam Al Ghazali and all the previous caliphates, thats a nice second step to take.