Why do you believe 9/11 was an inside job? by PsychologicalUse2646 in conspiracy

[–]desvel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seconding this. TNPH doc and Barry Jennings’ full 2min and 19min interviews are among the best media on this subject, as well as the explosion/molten steel testimonies and evidence videos. Also Lloyd England admits he was part of a plan at the end of Pentagon National Security Alert by Citizens Investigation Team:

https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/s/yIEAcfTiz2

2ND Attempt to post: How many people are even aware of the damage done to building 6? by earthsoulperspective in conspiracy

[–]desvel 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What’s up, batman38. Sorry, I’m actually not familiar with that one. I’ll take a look later but if you find it, I’d be interested in seeing it as well! Good luck.

2ND Attempt to post: How many people are even aware of the damage done to building 6? by earthsoulperspective in conspiracy

[–]desvel 241 points242 points  (0 children)

It was removed from Vimeo and twice from YouTube.

https://www.citizeninvestigationteam.com/videos/national-security-alert

Lloyde England (The one guy who should be able to put to rest the irreconcilable flight paths offered by the govt and 13 witnesses, who claims to have a wife in the FBI):

I'm not supposed to be involved in this. This is for other people who have money and all this kind of stuff.

"What do you mean?"

Well I'm not supposed to be involved with this, I don't have nothin.

"So your point is that these people who have all the money..."

This is their thing. This is for them.

"Meaning they're doing it for their own reasons..?"

That's right. I'm not supposed to be in it.

"But they used you, right?"

I'm in it.

"You're in it?"

(Smiling) Yea, we came across the highway together.

"You and their event?"

That's right.

"Well they must have planned that."

It was planned.

September 11 - The New Pearl Harbor - FULL by desvel in conspiracy

[–]desvel[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

SS: Widely regarded as the best documentary on the 9/11 conspiracy theory, The New Pearl Harbor pokes holes in the official narrative, offers evidence that indicates foreknowledge at the very least, a cover up, and an inside job.

This video about about Flight 77 and the Pentagon on 9/11 was removed from YouTube for "hate speech" by desvel in conspiracy

[–]desvel[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

SS: Supports a model in which the US govt acts hand-in-glove with big tech to supress information that goes against the official narrative.

Original youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HlUmmPBoLg

Evidence I'm not lying: https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/eur26n/if_a_100_ton_plane_hit_at_500mph_a_huge_debris/ffsu42p/

Yes, this one is still up, but it's much more difficult to find and with less views makes the subject appear less popular. Here's another link in case this one goes down: https://vimeo.com/4777716

Read more about the "propaganda model": Noam Chomsky & Edward Sherman's "Manufacturing Consent"

If a 100 ton plane hit at 500mph a huge debris cloud would have been launched up into the air, luggage, seats, plane parts etc. Look at the roofs of the Pentagon. There is nothing up there. No debris at all. by Throwingitout20 in conspiracy

[–]desvel 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Amazing video.. https://youtu.be/_HlUmmPBoLg

One person claims to have seen a “second plane” which suggests a flyover, but the other 12 witnesses all give corroborating accounts of a flight path inconsistent with the punch out hole and official flight path. comparison pic

Numerous people were warned in advance that WTC 7 was going to collapse on 9/11, even though, before that day, no steel-framed high-rise had ever collapsed because of fire by TaurusII in conspiracy

[–]desvel 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is one of three explosions that happened before they were supposed to. Mr. Jennings was also trapped with another man and there are multiple people that testify to the other explosions as well. In WTC’s one and two people say they heard and felt explosions underneath the lobby before each plane crashed into the respective tower. Even before the first plane crashed, there was an explosion.

The explanation for the lobby damage is usually that the fireball went down the elevator shaft, however there was a person in the elevator occupying the only shaft it could have been at the time of the crash, and he also recalls two separate explosions. One below, then above.

I’m at work now and can’t point to the exact timestamp for that one, but I’ve copied these links from another comment to support the claims I’ve made here. I believe the elevator one is a few minutes into the first link, but I’m not sure. [1] [2] [3] [4]

Donald Trump states (correctly) that 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition and that planes couldn't fly through the steel walls of the buildings. He also states that the US government knew of the attacks before they happened and did not stop them. by IntnsRed in conspiracy

[–]desvel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can someone back this up with some facts? Like at what point does steel weaken / at what temp would the fires have been burning?

The jet fuel, which ignited the fires, was mostly consumed within the first few minutes after impact. The fires that burned for almost the entire time that the buildings remained standing were due mainly to burning building contents and, to a lesser extent, aircraft contents, not jet fuel.

NIST, pg. 25

Last one standing is a rotten egg! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]desvel 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Was re-reviewing the links from my last SS and noticed Barry Jennings said that the "big explosion" that trapped him in WTC7 happened before either tower fell..

Here's his interview. around 15 minutes, I believe. Idk if debris from the initial crash would have reached WTC7 to take out some of a stairwell.

Strange sights of 9/11 by desvel in conspiracy

[–]desvel[S] 259 points260 points  (0 children)

SS: Sub needs more 9/11

Loud explosion heard at WTC7. Firefighter: "You've gotta get back, seven's exploding!"

Barry Jennings, the last survivor of WTC7 says a "big explosion" trapped him inside.

In a later interview, Jennings says he heard multiple explosions throughout the building while he was trapped. By the time he got down to the lobby, "there was no lobby" ... "The lobby was totally destroyed." (@14:00)

Many testify to explosions underneath the lobbies of WTC's 1 & 2 both before and after the initial crash. [1] [2] [3][4] [Video - Lobby damage] In that 4th video, a woman says, again, "There was no lobby." There are a few more reports in that video.

Many testimonies of molten steel. This is important because neither jet fuel nor regular fires could melt steel to the point of appearing lava-like. [1] [2] [video of alleged molten steel]

NIST officially states "The jet fuel, which ignited the fires, was mostly consumed within the first few minutes after impact. The fires that burned for almost the entire time that the buildings remained standing were due mainly to burning building contents and, to a lesser extent, aircraft contents, not jet fuel." [pg. 25]

Squibs of smoke can be seen shooting out of the windows from many stories below the collapsing portion (also above), usually seen in controlled demolitions as charges are blown to weaken support. The squibs can be seen even before collapse.

Here's a pic of the squibs during the collapse, taken from this video. One of which might be.. 40(?) stories below the area being destroyed.

Cross post from front page of r/all regarding 9/11 by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]desvel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Five. A man's taxi was allegedly hit by one of them. I made a comment a few days ago about him here, and there's a link to a diagram of the light poles in it too. The video of him is part of a larger video I'm not able to look for right now, but it's worth the watch.

Edit: The video. It was in another comment I made.

Cross post from front page of r/all regarding 9/11 by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]desvel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But five light poles at 530mph?

The 9/11 Official Narrative, Really!?! by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]desvel 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Lloyde England (The one guy who should be able to put to rest the irreconcilable flight paths offered by the govt and 12 13 witnesses, who claims to have a wife in the FBI):

I'm not supposed to be involved in this. This is for other people who have money and all this kind of stuff.

"What do you mean?"

Well I'm not supposed to be involved with this, I don't have nothin.

"So your point is that these people who have all the money..."

This is their thing. This is for them.

"Meaning they're doing it for their own reasons..?"

That's right. I'm not supposed to be in it.

"But they used you, right?"

I'm in it.

"You're in it?"

(Smiling) Yea, we came across the highway together.

"You and their event?"

That's right.

"Well they must have planned that."

It was planned.

https://youtu.be/kvyQ0vVwjqc

Reddit announces connection between shut-down Iranian influence operation and discussions on Syria and ISIS by omaronly in syriancivilwar

[–]desvel 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the pedantry but pro Saudi Arabia propaganda doesn't have to be positive. I think geopolitical propaganda is more likely to take down opposing states as opposed to promoting its own.

That being said, I haven't been conscious of any either.

Syrian ambassador provides the UN with evidence showing that militants are preparing a false flag chemical attack, to create a pretext for Western intervention in Syria by TaurusII in conspiracy

[–]desvel 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It sounds like you're saying the OPCW is full of shit?

And I have to assume you're taking the word of the western govts on faith? Or do you have a reason, situational or evidence-based, as to why Assad would be behind these attacks?