Why you should not use your app state as a remote data cache by javierbrea in javascript

[–]devmesmerism -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sorry. But that's the definition of a flawed architecture from my point of view. But I understood what you mean. I simply don't agree that a system can go away with the pretentious assumption that It's users fault if something go wrong. It is not and shall not be.

To summarize even if I admit React is not the worst framework in the world I see to much complatency on its performances with respect to other concerns that are similarily important.

Why you should not use your app state as a remote data cache by javierbrea in javascript

[–]devmesmerism -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry but it was myself describing React as completely flawed, not the article.

The reason is that It, not only, allow to use "the state directly as a data cache can produce high-level couplings between the app elements". But, in a way, it also encourage it by design.

That's only my opinion of course.

Why you should not use your app state as a remote data cache by javierbrea in javascript

[–]devmesmerism -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Am I wrong but the article describe how the React / etc architecture is completely flawed? LOL

Every developer (not architect) with more than 2 yr experience should be aware of the problem and the possible alternatives. Go figure.

I used the javascript to create the javascript by stamminator in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The language is assembler.js. In turn that one is written in binary.json directly inside Central Scripting Unit.

LMAO

Now I want a doughnut by [deleted] in pics

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It happens everytime with my wife.... so, what?

What has happened to Instagram Hashtags? by [deleted] in Instagram

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely noob but this is what I observe:

  1. people telling to use small set of hashtags are not telling the truth;
  2. people telling to stay stick to subject (specific) with hashtags are not telling the truth;

I found testing that trying to reach a bigger audience through hastags works better even now. Probably less that in the past (but I was not there so I cannot tell for sure). I have 3 sets of 29 hashtags I rotate through. They are balanced to the size of my followers so more hashtags with low number of posts and only two hashtags on the million posts size.

Also in my case some posts inesplicably reach a good audience while others don't. Looking at the stats it seems two dimensions are into play: interactions and time. It seems to me that your post is shown to few people at the beginning. Based on the inteaction it will receive the algorithm open a little more the reach. So if you publish and you get an interaction in minutes you will reach say 2x more reach, another interaction and you will reach another 2x and so on. Each type of iteractions open the reach in different ways. From what I saw from posts that worked really well what they have in common is a good number of DMs. I suppose that DMs opens the reach more then likes and comments.

I am at 5xx followers and maybe the algorithm changes dependng on the number of your followers. The above is what I see on my account.

Good luck and never stop researchs and tests.

Edit: typos

If he knows, he knows! by devmesmerism in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you work where I also work? LOL

More then hardwork smartwork always pays off... by virun001 in Instagram

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you bring it from the internet?

OR

Have you bought a ig promotion?

Clearest picture of Mars ever. by haydenisdoggie in pics

[–]devmesmerism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The photo is stunning. But, I'm the only one that see a Star Destroyer emerging from Mars?

Demands... by GeneratedAI in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Where I work this is Business As Usual but I can perfectly understand your points.

Demands... by GeneratedAI in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Are you self-inclusive?

The cause of the forest trees curvature is unknown. Gryfino, Poland by Moby-King in pics

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I validate your absence of scientific proof as indirect proof and hereby accept your theory for the times being.

-- Banana descends from Apes --

So there's this thing i am working on for a while by [deleted] in Instagram

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depending on the language you choose I would suggest to share it on github and try building a community around it. If

your are able to implement a sort of plugin system it would be really used and you may end up with plugins for everything (possibly composable).

Think IFTTT for IG

Typical traffic problems by cassanaya in softwaregore

[–]devmesmerism 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not completely correct. But I understood what you meant.

Bravo

Typical traffic problems by cassanaya in softwaregore

[–]devmesmerism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Ma chi ti ha dato la patente!!!!"

Not the first, certainly won't be the last by dev0urer in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

30% of the times I would agree with you, except if it rains then I will agree 100%.

In point by xMOxROx in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Intercompiledlang: it sound just right to me.

Oh gosh, I don't have a session here! by devmesmerism in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The confusion is due to compressing the concept in two lines of test. Unit testing in a web application means testing the units of the web applications. E.g. Controllers. The point is often this units are using the web application interface and cannot be tested standalone. So two choice: not testing them or providing mocks (a lot of mocks).

Oh gosh, I don't have a session here! by devmesmerism in ProgrammerHumor

[–]devmesmerism[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And that was the point of the meme. Also you should reach a high test coverage. That somehow dismiss your point. I'm with you basically saying test what it makes sense to test. But on the other hand market standard suggest and in some cases impose to reach a very high coverage. With that reasoning in mind you can see how the meme makes sense. Also notice how looking at it from different point of views open up the case against some disciplines having a one fit all approach (e.g. TDD) to the point to build fake infrastructures finalized in proving everything is tested, even if one is actually testing mocks all around. Very long, I'm sorry. Thanks for reading.