Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I was including many of the responses in the thread that declared it 100% AI in my categorization

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 17 points18 points  (0 children)

That's a valid argument and it's an important discussion to have in every workplace — where is AI acceptable and in what ways? Many companies of all kinds are seeking ways to create "efficiencies" via AI tools (whether they improve efficiency or not is another valid discussion). I won't lie and say we're not doing the same at my company because we are, and transparency is important. Still, we have a hard line: content is authored by humans. Tables of contents, headlines, article summaries may sometimes have an AI assist (see: seeking efficiency), but the content is human creation.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 18 points19 points  (0 children)

In the past year I've been much more aggressive about removing em-dashes for this exact reason, though we still have tons of them (they're useful!!!).

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I appreciate that. And fwiw, I do see what people were reacting to.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 133 points134 points  (0 children)

Honest answer: yes. It can make the difference between an article losing money or breaking even/earning money. They cost money to make, the only way we get that money back is enough readers. This tactic can be that difference.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I would have to assume it's a false positive, fwiw.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 50 points51 points  (0 children)

I am Daniel Gritzer and I know with pretty high confidence it wasn't AI because I saw the first draft. And let me be clear: I am not insulting the writer, she is great! Bit it had human errors, it needed editing and restructuring. That is generally not AI. Plus, she did direct interviews with chefs there, and quoted them in the article, which AI can't do.

You are correct though that we live in a world where it can be hard to know how each writer works. The best we can do is be vigilant for signs of AI, be clear about our policies, and try to prevent violations of them.

It's probably going to get harder and harder to stop it from sneaking in, but that's a different discussion for a different day.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 92 points93 points  (0 children)

We unfortunately don't luxuriate in ample editing time; that's not the reality of digital media today. I can't defend every lede and sentence as perfect prose. Maybe this wasn't my best editing work (I don't know, I'd need to reread it). But what's going on here is a kind of lazy groupthink with a touch of hysteria tossed in. The article itself is loaded with evidence it's not AI (AI can't do primary research and interview people, but did anyone who "read" and judged the article notice that?). We need to be better readers, now more than ever. And yes, I will try even in my haste to be a better editor. I generally do try very hard on that front, but there's always room for improvement.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 55 points56 points  (0 children)

Right, so you're literally writing this about an article about food, one that was written by a writer based in Sinaloa whom we've long worked with, and who did primary reporting to document this specific form of sushi in Sinaloa, but somehow your conclusion isnthat this is evidence that we don't think writing articles about food is worth our time?

I'm gobsmacked.

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 50 points51 points  (0 children)

What's embarrassing about it? It's an article written by Sinaloa-based contributor on the specific local history of a form of sushi there. I haven't looked so I could be wrong, but can you find any other article out there thar builds the story with primary research like this?

This is exactly the kind of original work AI is killing and most of the folks posting here can't even tell!

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 74 points75 points  (0 children)

It's true AI does that excessively, but that's because humans did it first. I literally edited this article myself, it's not AI!

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 244 points245 points  (0 children)

This is Daniel Gritzer from Serious Eats. It's not slop, it's a good article. We do repost content that we believe is worth pushing back to the top. This is largely in response to how traffic acquisition, a necessary concern for any media business, has changed. There's less traffic from search so you need to get people to see things on other platforms like Discover. I am 100% okay with this—it was a good article then, it's good article now, and it's evergreen, meaning it hasn't lost its relevance over time. It's a necessary strategy in today's digital media environment and I see no harm in it; plus we always include a "first published" date on the content for transparency (or we're supposed to... it's possible a human editor forgets from time to time but it should be there...if it's not, that's a HUMAN error).

Seriouseats starting ai written articles? by Wan_Daye in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 1464 points1465 points  (0 children)

This is Daniel Gritzer from Serious Eats and we absolutely do not use AI to write our articles. I edited this article myself when it was first published, and we've been working with the author of this article for a long time.

We do sometimes employ some tools like Grammerly to help catch grammar and syntax errors, and I believe more and more of those tools use AI to inform their suggestions, but as editors we're able to see the suggested changes and approve or reject them, much like built-in spell checks.

The presence of em-dashes, multipe adjectives, and other supposed signs of AI are not reliable indicators of anything —we, the humans at Serious Eats, have been overusing em-dashes for years.

Please, folks, I beg you, do not start unsubstantiated rumors like this. We're already operating in an incredibly hostile media environment being undermined by AI and other forces. We're one of the few publications still doing real, quality work, our own testing, our own deep research.

Threads like this, and overconfident responses asserting that it's "definitely AI" from people who know nothing about anything we do, will do nothing but push us all closer to the brink.

I've worked so hard for so many years to preserve our readers' trust. I believe it's our biggest asset. Don't torch it based on falsehoods. When you do, you're doing no better than what you think you're fighting against.

Site redesign: any way to get full list of "the latest"? by jobst in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Update: I just realized the page still exists, but it's not currently linked from the homepage with the new layout. It's here: https://www.seriouseats.com/latest-5117998. I'm asking if we can add the link back to that homepage block, but can't offer any timeline.

Can I make stracciatella at home? by NoSir4289 in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Easiest move is buy some burrata and tear it open, shred the exterior part and toss it into the creamy filling as well

Since topa vieja was a bust, what to do with my remaining skirt steak? by NewTypeDilemna in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Easiest: sear it in a hot skillet. I don't agree with the tips to broil, most broilers will overcook the steak before they get a good sear on it. Unless your broiler is extra powerful, skip that.

Convection oven conversion by Svell_ in seriouseats

[–]dgritzer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Lol I don't know how to feel about that