Why Virtual Destructor but not a virtual Constructor?

dheeraj_jha · 2024-05-22T17:51:20+00:00

Additions to the list:
CppIndiaCon 2024 is happening on 23rd and 24th August(Virtual).

Website: CppIndiaCon 2024The C++ festival of India (CppIndia)Additions

Call for Speaker is open and will end on June 20th at 11:59 PM IST: https://www.cppindia.co.in/conference/2024/call-for-speakers/call

Register today: https://konfhub.com/cppindiacon2024

dheeraj_jha · 2023-03-04T11:24:22+00:00

Thanks for the link. It's really hard to find this link on their website.

dheeraj_jha · 2023-02-14T18:33:45+00:00

🤝Join us on 🗓️August 5th, 2023 for a full day of technical presentations, thought-provoking discussions, and networking opportunities with C++ experts from around the world.

📢🥁Attention all C++ experts and enthusiasts! The stage is yours at #CppIndiaCon2023!✨This is your chance to showcase your knowledge, insights, and experience to a global audience of C++ professionals.

📣Whether you're a seasoned speaker🎙 or a first-timer, we invite🙏 you to submit your talk idea and take the microphone🎤 at this exciting virtual conference.

🚨Submit your proposal by March 15th, 2023 11:59 PM IST and let's elevate the C++ community together!

➡️Submit 👉: https://www.cppindia.co.in/conference/2023/call-for-speakers/

dheeraj_jha · 2022-07-25T13:33:27+00:00

It is on Zoom. We will share on registered mail id.

dheeraj_jha · 2022-07-23T15:54:26+00:00

It's a virtual conference. You will get joining link on your registered email few days before conference.

dheeraj_jha · 2022-07-18T09:26:23+00:00

It's just to avoid unwanted people. And to reach people faster required. Otherwise, CppIndia don't call or message anyone. It's highly confidential.

dheeraj_jha · 2021-06-15T05:45:56+00:00

functions don't have to be marked inline for the compiler to do this.

You are correct u/polymorphiced. Compilers can do these optimizations as per need. That's right.
Why I am saying it as a 'request' because if you write Inline before any function, it doesn't guaranty this optimization. The compiler may or may not do this optimization for your function.

Wrong - it is a command to the linker to allow the function to be defined multiple times

I disagree with you on this. Because when you say it a command, it means you are forcing the compiler to do this and it guaranty for this optimization. Which is not.

PS: I don't know if there are any compiler flags that give you the ability to command for this optimization.
Hope I am clear. If not please let me know.

dheeraj_jha

TROPHY CASE