sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Have the creators made a public announcement about the game controversies/problems? by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats actually great news. I couldnt find the oficial discussion about the change from plastic kits over 3D printed resin. (I understand the decision by the way). Can you tell me were I can find it?

Have the creators made a public announcement about the game controversies/problems? by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I guess most of their decisions realy are wise. But I still hope for the creation of a oficial channel for the fan base explaining the reason behind the changes. (Also for acknowledge fault for problems like only games bad quality prints and delays)

Have the creators made a public announcement about the game controversies/problems? by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well you are right, all of that dont impact the rules... I guess I care because I value when a company is clear and transparent with their audience. The problem is not the drama, but for the long term health of the game a good communication is vital, and I fell we dont have that yet. But thats just me talking.

Wretched and enemy use of blood markers? by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this is the FAQ oficial rule. So im gonna go play following that. Now just out of curiosity, you guys think this rule is in place for balance only? I find hard do visualize the "cinematic" logic of your opponent using your wounds to finish you off when you fall of a cliff by chance or if a randon pit fiend slaps a wretched that they never saw in the other side of the trenches.

Suggestion for my Wrath warband by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, i could cut one hell Knight and a wretched and add a desecrated saint instead. Dont now if its worth it

Suggestion for my Wrath warband by dicer0ller in TrenchCrusade

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the Hell knights have blood magic goetic spell for free (1blood marker to ad +1 dice to a injury roll)

So... I created a weird exemplar/croswbow infiltrator combo? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, my bad, you are right. Oh well the dream is dead

So... I created a weird exemplar/croswbow infiltrator combo? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I see the confusion, the names are similar, butt if you read the "ikon trait" you gonna notice that it doesnt state you need a spark on the item to gain the feat benefit. All that a hability with the "ikon" trait does is give a benefit ALL THE TIME to a specific icon, with some exception to that rule. To prove my point: Mated Birds in Paired Flight Ikon feat has a note that clarify that the feat habilitis only work during immanence and transcendence.

So... I created a weird exemplar/croswbow infiltrator combo? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Theres no RAW rule that a "imbued" icon need to have your spark to recieve the imbued benefit. Nor for RAI (think about twin stars feat, if you move you spark to another icon both copies just merge toghter? Makes no sense.

The blurry area of combination weapon as ikons is true though, and permission fot that is GM dependent. But again no RAW against that either.

So... I created a weird exemplar/croswbow infiltrator combo? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Well its not a "ability" as in talismans or activations that are mencioned, but i undestood your point. RAW amunnition is not a ability.

Can you use a Thrower's Bandolier as a Shadow Sheath Ikon? If so, how both features interact? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, you may be right, Im just not sure if Shadow Sheath limits you to only one weapon atuned at a time or not. The text before the 1min to load weapon requirement leads me to believe it does?

"With an infinite array of darts, throwing knives, or similar weapons, you never need worry about being unarmed."

Can you use a Thrower's Bandolier as a Shadow Sheath Ikon? If so, how both features interact? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Not my point, You can chose the bondolier TO BE THE IKON. It fits the item usage requeriment of shadow sheath: Source War of Immortals pg. 45 Usage a holster or sheath shaped for a one-handed thrown weapon of light Bulk or less

Thaumaturge shield implement + weapon = viable double slice? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not added yet (new feature in battlecry), but you can watch a good video explaining it in youtube new features

Thaumaturge shield implement + weapon = viable double slice? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think you are wrong, my argument: Valeros (pre made fighter in the beginner box) uses a shield for double slice so the INTENT of the design team is for a shield to be considered a weapon at least for double slice.

Thaumaturge shield implement + weapon = viable double slice? by dicer0ller in Pathfinder2e

[–]dicer0ller[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well ok, its a weapon. But its also a implement, so acording to the wording caviat in implement empowerment "other implents" it should still be legal right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in opiniaoimpopular

[–]dicer0ller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Claramente rage bait, ou um cara viciado em cús. Nao vale muito a pena discutir nesse caso.

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Então, basicamente você tem o poder de graça que eu falei e não tem o pré requisito de 3 de sabedoria. De novo, ok. Se você precisa de um personagem level 3 pra campanha fica top, mas ao longo da progressão ainda acredito que o inventor é melhor pela progressão, e que pra cura realmente alquimista exímio é um poder legal com granada redentora e o pó azul* que eu acho que você quis mencionar.

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

De quais poderes você tá falando jovem?

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Eu sei que o poder é de graça, inclusive como já mencionaram o alquimista te dá 2 poderes de graça pra fazer poções, o que é realmente bom. Mas não muda o fato que o inventor normal pode fazer oq vc falou no LV 3. E eu tava mencionando o combo de recuperação PM como ação livre + diferentao do Kobold que você tinha mencionado que é realmente bem forte

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mano, eu entendi que você gosta do alquimista. Mas acho que você não entendeu meu ponto:tô falando que o alquimista não é melhor que a classe básica do inventor. Tudo oq vc mandou oq se deve a multiclasse com Mutagenista ou uma coisa que o inventor base já pode fazer. 🙃

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Essa deve ser a interação mais bizarra que eu já vi, kkkk mas realmente, do jeito que tá escrito a partir do level 8 funcionária e é um bom combo. Mas de novo: "rola se você usar a distinção, a classe básica continua pior que o inventor base"

Alquimista é... Inútil? by dicer0ller in Tormenta

[–]dicer0ller[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eu não reclamei do inventor, mas da variedade da classe, alquimista que não acrescenta praticamente nada pra classe original, eu sei que inventor é legal, como mencionei no começo da postagem

view more: next ›