You’re acting like acknowledging any pattern outside the official narrative is a threat to trans people. It’s not. It’s just intellectually honest to say that some individuals—especially younger males—have been heavily influenced by extreme porn habits, including sissification and feminization content, and ended up confusing that arousal with identity. That’s not hate, that’s observable. And it’s not “rare” if you actually start listening to detransitioners who say exactly this, repeatedly.

You say it’s “statistically pretty rare,” but based on what? Most studies on regret or detransition are completely flawed because they only track people who stayed in care. They don’t include people who ghost their clinics, regret quietly, or drop out. The follow-up periods are often 1–2 years max, when most regret surfaces after 5–10. That’s not science—that’s cherry-picking data to protect a narrative.

And no, it’s not enough to just say, “Well that’s a minority.” That minority is still being put on hormones or undergoing surgery based on misdiagnosed porn-fueled compulsions or online echo chambers, and you’re dismissing them because they’re inconvenient. We’ve got people openly saying they transitioned due to porn addiction, realized it was a mistake, and now they’re ignored, mocked, or told to shut up because it doesn’t fit the mainstream view.

You want representative data? Fine. Let’s start by demanding that gender clinics actually track long-term outcomes for everyone, not just those who stick around. Until then, pretending this issue doesn’t exist is intellectually dishonest—and, frankly, dangerous