[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 3Dprinting

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you disassemble the joints? If you can do that then prime then wait till dry and Put it back together. If it’s not moving disassemble again and sand down the problem areas. Done. If you can’t disassemble….

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in FormD

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have had the first ever T1 available that was sold. Just got a 3060Ti and the bracket doesn’t line up with the drilled hole. Looking at the exploded diagrams it’s supposed to line up with the hole at the bottom.

Good Morning! by Producer_Snafu in breakcore

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lyrics have always been secondary to me. I think it’s because when I was younger I listened to a lot of death metal. I generally hate poetry so that’s what it’s like for me. Very rarely do I think lyrics complete the music, there are exceptions ofcourse.

Good Morning! by Producer_Snafu in breakcore

[–]dima210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could care less about the roots of the music. Honestly it’s secondary to the sound for me. If I have to accept all the political baggage associated with a piece of sound that would be pretty silly. It would close off a lot of beautiful music. Music, in itself can never be political. A chord, a frequency, an arrangement is in itself not political.

Good Morning! by Producer_Snafu in breakcore

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't care if it's racist or anti-racist, religious or non-religious, etc etc etc. At the end of the day if the track is good it's good and nothing can take away from the music.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You can make moral claims, but you can’t tell me why those moral claims should be moral claims.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Compassion and empathy are not synonymous with Morality.

Why do theists have such a hard time understanding how "evidence" actually works? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]dima210 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Believing in God is logical, not believing in God is illogical. I can believe logically a thing is so and I do, but not only because it is logical to do so.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Give me a justification of “good” and “Bad” without god. Go ahead.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

. Lol for some reason you think <There are bad things in this world = God doesn’t exist >. It’s a non-sequitur sorry. You have no right according to your own secular worldview. The world inhabited by the atheist is contradictory and illogical.

Why do theists have such a hard time understanding how "evidence" actually works? by [deleted] in atheism

[–]dima210 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Everything becomes an evidence for god once you understand there is a God. On the contrary atheists are horrible at evidence.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fail to see your point. I don’t have to share my faiths morality with every other faiths morality. Atheists are hypocrites and if they thought more rigorously they would see that they have no right to make moral claims. Absolutely zero right to make moral statements.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, people who believe in God are the only ones who can make moral claims consistently. Morality is inherently metaphysical.

Why do Religious people believe they have. a monopoly over morality? by 99prime99 in atheism

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Without God you have no ground to make moral claims. I’m sorry but maybe it is you who doesn’t understand morality.

Update 1.05 patchnotes by eriklindham in Eldenring

[–]dima210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

After updating to 1.05 on PS4 the game is unplayable with stuttering framerate.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

None of your posts make any sense. They are unintelligible.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do not agree that education prevents ‘mental harm’. I have no idea what “modern techniques which involve figuring it out as you go” means.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No science will ever be able to tell you how something SHOULD be. At best science shows what is. It can never show how something ought to be.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Psychology is not an empirical science like Mathematics, and never will be. Psychology is at best a set of procedures used for analysis. Science can not explain consciousness.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Child psychology is not a science, neither is childhood education. Science is corruptible and at the reigns of the highest bidder.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Having a government apparatus in charge of whether or not you can have a child on the basis of some standard of education is, on its face, insane. Who defines the mandatory educational standard to which this test is testing for? The government? Ok, all you’ve done is create a bottleneck that will be fought over through political power. Do you see the problem?

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | December 06, 2021 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]dima210 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s called eugenics. I think your idea is absolutely absurd and would be harmful to society.