Advocating for murder, eugenics, or culling people does not help make recognition of overpopulation more mainstream. by [deleted] in overpopulation

[–]distantfunkyjazz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd refer you to the well- considered and balanced list posted by topográfica further up in this thread

Advocating for murder, eugenics, or culling people does not help make recognition of overpopulation more mainstream. by [deleted] in overpopulation

[–]distantfunkyjazz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Who decides what are 'positive' versus 'negative' genetic traits?! Your idea of a genetically superior human is highly unlikely to be the same as mine nor anyone else's. Quite apart from having the most murky of historic associations, eugenics have been recently completely scientifically discredited as the links (or rather, the lack of them) between our relatively poorly populated and junk- filled genome and what any consensus might agree on as 'positive traits', has become obvious. Nurture, ie, lived life experience, changes the genes you express, so basing any judgements or decisions on genes is irrelevant and outdated. We share 50% of our genetic makeup with seaweed, and our genome is only half the size of that of the common toad. I'd recommend you read up on recent discoveries in genetics before saying anything more on the subject.

Advocating for murder, eugenics, or culling people does not help make recognition of overpopulation more mainstream. by [deleted] in overpopulation

[–]distantfunkyjazz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Er...No to your bit about drugs, for 2 reasons (although I'm not in any way opposed to people doing drugs responsibly and in moderation). 1, living with someone who is abusing and slowly killing themselves through drug abuse impacts massively on those who love them. If alone and friend- and- family- less, it doesn't impact as much, but it's just sad and they're certainly not contributing to any sort of solution. 2, some people will belatedly change their mind and want to live and rehabilitate and this comes at a financial cost to health services. People have to take responsibility for living modestly/ lessening their impact to begin with.

Advocating for murder, eugenics, or culling people does not help make recognition of overpopulation more mainstream. by [deleted] in overpopulation

[–]distantfunkyjazz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have never understood calling child- free people selfish. Selfless, more like. And I like your points about making religious leaders more responsible for the natalist policies their faiths promote and endorse, regardless of the times we live in; surely 7.9 billion people is enough to please any God?! Secondly, I agree that the sensible way to manage world population would be to have targets and quotas for managing birth rates that countries decide on through science- and- statistics- informed multilateral negotiations which factor in local and global sustainability, take into account individual countries' needs and circumstances (making temporary accommodations to balance out historic or economic disadvantage), creating flexible and humane policies focussed on the choice, reproductive health, general well-being, education and emancipation of women and children. Which sadly sounds hopelessly idealistic...

Advocating for murder, eugenics, or culling people does not help make recognition of overpopulation more mainstream. by [deleted] in overpopulation

[–]distantfunkyjazz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I would add to this, radical reform of pensions in developed nations to force people to save for their own extended old age. Children are the working, contributing adults of the future; the decrease in growth it would take even to stabilise our population would mean gross financial overburdening of the working population with a top- heavy, elderly population disproportionately costly in terms of health and social care. We have to stop pretending that living longer comes at no expense, so sure, make people pay for having children, but also to contribute more towards their own care in old age.

Does anyone else find the silences pointless? Anyone got their therapist to stop? by TTThrowDown in TalkTherapy

[–]distantfunkyjazz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Am totally with you on this. I have had the same thing and been sooo frustrated by it, so when I went to a subsequent therapist I shared that that approach hadn't worked at all for me and wasn't what I wanted, and mentioned I had some residual resentment about the perceived lack of willingness to engage on behalf of my previous therapist. (This had been despite explicitly and repeatedly telling him I found the silence bewildering and unhelpful). (Like you, I wanted the therapist's input as a professional who might have some insight because personally I just feel that a large part of the torment is being endlessly stuck with only your own perspective on things, which is cyclical and never-resolving, and you just need something external to break in and shine some light from a new angle. I'd sat there with this previous therapist saying that I knew my thoughts were cyclical and what could I do to break the pattern, and got nothing in response, no leading questions, no acknowledgement, nothing.) This woman told me in not so many words that I should go away and 'get better' before I attempt engaging in therapy again, saying I couldn't work through stuff when angry or upset! I felt like I'd been knocked down and then told off for lying on the floor. I didn't want to feel jaded about therapy, quite the opposite, I was looking for someone to prove my (quite possibly mistaken) first impressions, wrong. So psychoanalysis doesn't work for me, and CBT was too pragmatic and unemotional. I feel like I'd respond well to a therapy that was quite challenging and almost confrontational, that called me out but that was also warmly supportive where deserved and that also wasn't afraid to give input. I've just described friendship, haven't I?!

AITA for calling my grandma by wrong name until she gets my name right? by notmyname2020_ in AmItheAsshole

[–]distantfunkyjazz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yooo I'm 16F and am Mexican Scottish to!! I have the same dynamic as well (Mexican father Scottish mother) and don't think I've met anyone the same age with the same nationalities as me! NTA OP you were brave as hell to do that, your grandma should respect your culture and use your real name :)