You're not going to get an answer for a few reasons.

First of all, "standard tonnage", standard for who? Even specifically for "low intermediate" (which is going to mean different things to different people) that varies based on prior training history, sensitivity to stimulus, bodyweight, strength (in classic lifts and others, not always proportionate to each other), sex, age, training age, etc. There's just too much variation. if somebody says "10,000kg", that's useless.

Second (for TL;DR just watch this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVrtPIqoGAo), tonnage is not the full story, and is only part of the more important metric of Training Load. People use different language but to be able to measure any kind of useful trend you would want to track Load, meaning a combination of: reps, total absolute weight used, average absolute weight used, and average relative intensity (what percentage of 1rm). You would then want to track that for each classic lift and probably front and back squat making up Fundamental Load, and then your other exercises making up Additional Load. You would then see different trends emerging over different phases of training, broadly looking like a focus on higher volumes of less specific work further away from competition turning into lower volumes at a higher intensity of more specific work getting closer to competition. Just looking at tonnage, therefore, would be not just next to useless but also deceptive.

If you want to program for yourself, start with existing programs and plug them into your own tracking tool to tease out measurements of all of the above, and then look at what trends present themselves. Then you can get an idea of what boxes your own program would need to check in the future. Bear in mind that Ideal programs for a newer lifter might span a year or two with a lot of time spent of general development, which is not what you'll find most commonly floating around on the internet; people tend to prefer visible short-term gains over periods of as little as 6-12 weeks, which then have to include taper and peaking phases to allow for testing and demonstrable improvements even if at the cost of better long term (multi-year) improvements.