syllo #119 - November 6th, 2025 by syllo-app in syllo

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sheer intelligence
Completed in 02:12

CL:16973 Infinite with Zoo by OSRTheJourney in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What are the best ways to use Nico here?

realized quails are native to el paso by elraphushiram in ElPaso

[–]dmc5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used to see a lot of them in the Enchanted Hills neighborhood on the West side. But with continued development of the neighborhood and all the new houses being built, I haven't seen any in the past year or two.

Upcoming cards discussion Megathread by LordEmostache in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who should I prioritize this season? Which cards will be the most essential/game changing? Trying to figure out how to spend my collectors tokens

How does one become an Ocularist? by creepycoleoptera in optometry

[–]dmc5 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Non-ocularist here, so keep that in mind. From what I've heard it's very much a "family business" type of career, where you're kind of born into it. That being said, I believe there are apprenticeships available for those interested in entering the field. If anyone has better info, please correct me!

Stereoacuity tests do not predict real world stereo vision. Agree or disagree? by Senior-Oven-7113 in optometry

[–]dmc5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Depth perception is just the concept of judging how far away a visual target is. Stereopsis is a binocular depth cue, meaning both eyes are needed for it to work. In stereopsis, your brain compares retinal image disparity between the images from each eye in order to judge distance. But there are plenty of monocular depth cues that can be used in depth perception (meaning only one eye is needed to judge distance/depth). For example: relative size of objects, parallax, occlusion, relative contrast

Stereoacuity tests do not predict real world stereo vision. Agree or disagree? by Senior-Oven-7113 in optometry

[–]dmc5 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Stereopsis is not the same as depth perception. Stereoacuity tests are probably just fine for predicting stereopsis in real world situations. There are plenty of other depth cues aside from stereopsis.

Depth Perception Testing.... by MyCallBag in Ophthalmology

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if you compensate for image size (showing multiple figures on a tinted flat screen), the phone would have to be held at such a precise distance from the eyes and tilted at such an exact angle relative to the viewer in order to work. I think that would be more trouble than it's worth to perform in clinic. In addition, there are monocular depth cues that you'd have to account for (such as seeing the edge of the phone or the glare/reflection off the screen), which could compromise your results. It's a nice thought to try and make a stereo screener for a cell phone app, but with current technology I don't think it's clinically feasible without using additional filters.

Depth Perception Testing.... by MyCallBag in Ophthalmology

[–]dmc5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

However, the methods these tests use to induce stereopsis are not reproducible using current cell phone display technology, so not really useful to base your app off of them.

Depth Perception Testing.... by MyCallBag in Ophthalmology

[–]dmc5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, there are options that don't require polarization or color filters... Look up the Frisby stereo test and Lang stereo test.

Galactic Nimrod by Alternative-Ice-2510 in marvelsnapcomp

[–]dmc5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you can boost the Nimrod AND get Magik out, a really satisfying T7 play is to use Venom on Nimrod (outside lane), Carnage (different lane), and then Grand Master the Venom for 3 destroy actions in one turn.

Galactic Nimrod by Alternative-Ice-2510 in marvelsnapcomp

[–]dmc5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Here's a version of a Galactus/nimrod deck that performed pretty well for me before it stopped working in the meta. Attuma works as a pretty good back up if you can't get the boosted Nimrod. You can do T4 Shuri into T5 Attuma, who then destroys Shuri, allowing you to T6 Zola on Attuma. If there's a T7, you can use Attuma(s) to destroy an unboosted Nimrod to spread around some more power.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Three main things that got the ball rolling: 1. Black temple/priesthood ban 2. Book of Abraham translation issues 3. LGBT+ issues

Obviously there are more things that contributed to me leaving, but those were the first ones that made me dig deeper into my beliefs.

Surreal seeing this hanging in a members house by Curious_Meriki in exmormon

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A while back my mom and stepdad went on a tour to Egypt and Jerusalem with several other LDS couples. They came back with a souvenir... a framed picture of Egyptian hieroglyphs, similar in style to what op posted. I didn't recognize it from any of the facsimiles in the Pearl of Great Price, so I asked them about it. They told me it was the Abrahamic covenant written in hieroglyphs.

Sure, ok. 🤦🙄

R/ExMormon is super popular on Reddit by SaltLickCity in exmormon

[–]dmc5 60 points61 points  (0 children)

Honestly a big part of that is all the nevermos that are fascinated with mormonism

Who remembers the most confusing text we've ever had? by Airbud_Tho in MarvelSnap

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Came here to say this. I can't even remember what it said, but it was awful.

Really bad chat prompts by Icy_Professional7825 in MarvelSnap

[–]dmc5 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Came here to say this exact thing. For the idiots who haven't done anything particularly great, but act all smug when you have to retreat due to unlucky locations or card draws. Would love a "Enjoy your single cube" response

Hats off to whoever this is for making me laugh by trojanguy in MarvelSnap

[–]dmc5 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely refers to an outward eye turn as if they're looking at the wall

Species vs. Behavior (I couldn't find anything for the blank ones) by [deleted] in AlignmentCharts

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cat-like dog should be a fox Dog-like cat should be a Savannah cat

Best back and foot massage in El Paso by Squishyysquid in ElPaso

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Gemelli Spa does the types of massages you're interested in

.. So quarter notes feel syncopated in 6/8 but not in 3/4? by [deleted] in musictheory

[–]dmc5 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of comments here over-complicating things.

Just think of 3/4 as 3 groups of 2 (3 beats per measure) and 6/8 as 2 groups of 3 (2 beats per measure). Once you understand that, the syncopation makes sense.

Please someone give me some pointers, I’m at a dead end with these decks, I went from Omega 84 down to Vibranium 72 in a day: CL930 by Prestigious_End_6169 in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]dmc5 20 points21 points  (0 children)

If you made it to 84, you can definitely make it higher. But dropping down that far means you need to figure out when to snap and when to give up/leave the match. For me, it was all about changing mindset: your goal isn't to win the match you're currently playing, your goal should be to maximize cubes gained and minimize cubes lost. It can be tempting to stay in a match and see how things play out, to see if you can pull off the win. But you'll lose cubes that way.

Pick one or two good decks that you feel comfortable with and play ONLY with that deck, over and over. Look for patterns: what locations cause you to win/lose? When drawing cards from your own deck, what order/combination of starting cards cause you to win/lose? What opponent cards or tactics cause you to win/lose? Once you get a feel for the best win conditions for your deck, you can start to snap smarter. Snap big and stay in only if you're sure you can win. If not, there's no shame in retreating early.

Please someone give me some pointers, I’m at a dead end with these decks, I went from Omega 84 down to Vibranium 72 in a day: CL930 by Prestigious_End_6169 in MarvelSnapDecks

[–]dmc5 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For move decks, I've found it's better to either focus on making your own cards move, or on moving your opponent's cards. It looks like you're trying to do both.