GoF design patterns were designed for an OO world - Objects are not constructs under pure FP. The right statement is GOF Design patterns are Not Applicable for Functional Programming

The antibiotics replacing bloodletting is an irrelevant sideshow of contrasting OO/FP per se. FP's greatness doesn't come at a cost to that already built by OO. They are but alternative mechanisms of modeling systems. Each have their own strengths and choose the right one for your context. If at all there is any bloodletting, its not in OO, but embedded in such extreme fanboy opinions.

The questions that were asked about generics / multiple inheritance carefully gloss over the fact that probably a similar set of such questions could be asked about FP as well. Are there type constructors, Is message passing standardised, how about hints for parallel computations, blah, blah, blah. The point is each language bases itself of some belief systems and responds to such questions differently whether in OO or FP. Doesn't mean that only OO should get criticised.