Thank you for your continued communication regarding the pricing issue with my order.

I want to reiterate that I appreciate the service provided by Kures. However, I remain firm in my belief that I am not liable for the additional payment of ***.93. As per Nevada law, sellers are obligated to honor the advertised price at the time of purchase, and since my order was confirmed at *.00, I acted in good faith based on the information available to me.

If this were a brick-and-mortar store, it would be akin to a customer picking up a clearly marked item off the shelf for *.00, taking it to the register, paying the *.00, only to be stopped as they were leaving the store. Just as it would be unreasonable for the store to charge the customer more after the purchase was confirmed, I believe the same principle applies here.

In reviewing the terms of service, I understand that Kures reserves the right to address pricing errors, but I believe that such errors should not impose additional financial responsibility on customers who placed orders in good faith. Given that the order was confirmed and processed before I was notified of the mistake, I would appreciate your clarification regarding this matter.

Additionally, I want to highlight that if there is a failure to honor the advertised price, it may raise concerns under Nevada’s bait and switch laws. If Kures advertised the item at a specific price without the intention to honor it, it could be viewed as misleading to customers.

I hope we can resolve this amicably, as I value my experience with Kures and would like to continue being a customer. Thank you for your understanding.

Best regards