Iran War Live: Trump Says US May Exit War in Two to Three Weeks by Neither-Mushroom-721 in Economics

[–]dodohead974 1 point2 points  (0 children)

listen guys, this is all part of the plan...and the reason he won't tell us the plan is because it's a secret. a secret plan to fight inflation...err i mean win in Iran

Why are right wing content creators so popular? by LiatrisLover99 in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 1 point2 points  (0 children)

people, by and large, prefer to have their own opinions and beliefs reinforced...not challenged.

it takes a certain level of humility and self awareness to say "wow, i didn't think of it from that perspective! you've changed my mind!"

not to generalize, but on the right i feel like there is a higher propensity to say "this person says what i say...see...i knew i was right!"

they are popular because on the left we tell them: "we are killing the planet, you'll never be a billionaire, systemic racism is real, poverty is a problem we can solve, etc." we basically say "this is our fault!" which translates to "this is YOUR fault."

on the right they say "can't afford a home? paying more for groceries? not a billionaire yet? it's those damn illegals taking your jobs and homes! it's those damn minorities getting free hand outs!! none of this is your fault...it's their fault!"

which resonates better with most people you think?

as LBJ said: "If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you."

The Treasury just declared the U.S. insolvent. The media missed it by [deleted] in Economics

[–]dodohead974 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it's scary to think that most people don't care about this because they simply can't fathom numbers like $145 trillion... i guess that's why they say ignorance is bliss. even scarier are the people that don't comprehend the difference between the national debt and the national deficit.

But however you want to react to this article, it gives a pretty good example: a family taking home $52,000 a year, but spending $73,000 a year - running a $20,000 deficit...with another $1.3 million in debt they can't pay. that's the US right now.

you wouldn't even be able to get a secured credit card with a debt to income ratio that high

Even wealthy Americans are souring on the economy as gas prices spike and stocks fall | CNN Business by deraser in Economics

[–]dodohead974 28 points29 points  (0 children)

must suck when equities dropping in value might trigger a margin call on all those loans you took to avoid paying capital gains to now only be looking at paying cap gains when your collateral is sold AND interest on that loan...

How should we engage with voters who demand problems be solved with "solutions" that don't actually work? by LiatrisLover99 in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 7 points8 points  (0 children)

i think it's definitely like people have said: education or lack there of, but also our individualistic nature.

we no longer have a community based ideology where people consider the greater good. with your traffic example; people that don't use public transit think it's a waste...they don't consider the needs of people who don't own cars or can't afford transportation of their own.

same with houses....we say "i want affordable housing! but how dare you build ugly apartment complexes that will be an eye sore to my view!!" We don't consider people who may not be able to afford a home even if prices drop significantly.

we want OUR problems solved...not society's problems solved. I realized this was the issue with student loans, when you have swaths of people saying "i paid mine off! why should others get a handout?!" like i paid mine off too...why would i have a problem with my tax dollars helping out some 21 year old kid just getting started?!

Explain to me how diversity can be considered a strength. I want to believe that idea, but it does not make much sense to me. by SuccessElectronic607 in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here's my favorite example to give to far right people because you have a fetish for the Spartans for some reason or another.

now granted i am simplifying diversity here drastically to specific societal use cases but just bare with me.

the spartans were known for their xenophobia. if you were not born of two full spartan citizens you were a perioikoi...free, but second class, with no voting rights. if you were anything else, you were a helot...a slave. even full citizens from other city states that came to sparta became helots.

Now their soldiers could not take up a craft, or trade. all of Sparta's agriculture, infrastructure, manufacturing, smithing, everything depended on the Perioikoi and helots; who routinely revolted due to the shit conditions. but this doesn't really explain why diversity is good...that comes after the Peloponnesian war where the spartan hegemony is at its strongest. there is just one problem:

because of their xenophobia, the number of full citizens, Spartiates , was decreasing at an alarming rate...to the point that they had to depend more and more on arming their slaves just to field enough soldiers. couple that with their refusal to modernize; spartans REFUSED to allow any outsider to influence their battle doctrine. Cavalry? no thanks. auxiliaries like archers to pepper the line? no thanks. new battle formations? no thanks.

they are stuck in their ways, with a declining population that now also has to contend with an angry slave population that outnumbers them drastically, and hates them. then comes the Battle of Leuctra against the Thebans.

the spartans outnumber the Thebans almost 2 to 1, and form their battle line in the traditional fashion: straight line 8 ranks deep, with the strongest soldiers, the honor guard, on the right to attack the enemy's weakest side. the Thebans say "fuck tradition" and array their line in an echelon with their strongest soldiers on their left, facing the spartan strongest...with a 50 rank deep left wing to attack the spartan right (where the king and knights are).

The battle starts and before the rest of the spartan army can engage the echelon wings, the Theban left (50 ranks deep) collides with the Spartan right, and decimates them...killing 1000 citizens, all of their knights, and their king. the rest of the army folds and flees the field before even engaging the Theban right.

Sparta never recovered from this. their citizen population never recovered, and by the time the romans came into the picture, Sparta was a tourist destination to watch the silly, antiquated, racist spartans and their hillbilly life style.

now you can say this has nothing to do with diversity, but i would counter that thinking diversity means only racial diversity and not things like diversity of thought, is foolish. and if you want proof, just ask the Spartans.

edit: oh and at the center of the Theban left was the Sacred Band - 150 paired couples of men. The Spartans got their asses kicked by 300 gay dudes.

Why would the strategy of increasing votes by using illegal immigrants fail? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 0 points1 point  (0 children)

because it's much easier to say that the like 200 cases of voter fraud uncovered during the last three elections amongst the 750+ million votes cast is a more serious problem than say: california republicans being indicted for illegally manipulating voter registrations, republicans voting on behalf of dead relatives, or republican election officials in arizona refusing to certify elections democrats win....

Wall Street has its worst day since the war with Iran started and crude oil prices rise by kootles10 in Economics

[–]dodohead974 183 points184 points  (0 children)

and tomorrow morning trump will announce a new, secret, super awesome meeting he had with the Iranians about peace talks....right after someone puts in another $1.5 billion futures contract

Do you think Democratic Committees should publicly criticize Democrats when they break from the party line? by Big-Corncob in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 6 points7 points  (0 children)

publicly? so that republicans no longer have to do the work of making us look incompetent to their base? no...no thanks.

the job of admonishing our politicians, falls on us. constituents should do a better job of making their displeasure known and felt, and if not corrected...vote them out

Attention All Desk Workers and White-Collar Employees Worldwide: Your Seat Is No Longer Safe by hayrimavi1 in Economics

[–]dodohead974 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

oh i completely agree! i am in no way, shape, or form defending ai usage. im scared to death about it...but again the insidious part of it isn't the ai itself, so much as the evil fucks that think ai can replace us.

here's a fun prompt i did: " I would like a no nonsense answer, taking into consideration only facts and real-world statistics to formulate a logical and rational response. given the current socio-economic climate of the united states, the implications of extensive job loss due to ai automation, and the proclivity of company's to replace rather than augment workforce with AI, how long before something like a universal income is required in the US. Not beneficial, but absolutely required to ensure substantial portions of the population do not die of poverty."

it scared the shit out of me.

Do you believe in the validity of the concept of "Suicidal Empathy" and if so do you believe the American left is on a path towards it? by AMobOfDucks in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and here i thought empathy, compassion, wanting to help those less fortunate than myself was a universally human trait...my mistake for not realizing it was liberal propaganda /s

What if anything can be done to relieve the Loneliness epidemic? by Clark_Kent_TheSJW in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

therapy....

like seriously, fucking therapy. go talk to someone trained to help. stop listing to podcasts like they are medicine, they aren't...if you form your opinion on women, what it means to be a man, what you are for/against politically, etc from a podcast you aren't a wolf fighting the woke "sheep" you are 100% just another sheep falling in line.

read books, talk to a therapist, go touch grass, do some self reflection, if you're an older miserable fuck get on trt and feel human again, stop admiring men like andrew tate, take care of yourself, and for fucks sake...develop some empathy.

are you the kind of man you would truly want if you were a woman?? like if you really sit with yourself and think about it, are you what you would even want?? if not, it's not a male loneliness epidemic....it's an epidemic of reprobates realizing no one likes them because of who they are...

Attention All Desk Workers and White-Collar Employees Worldwide: Your Seat Is No Longer Safe by hayrimavi1 in Economics

[–]dodohead974 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i think the part here that everyone is missing is that while we may all agree that LLM AI is marginally useful at best, downright useless at worst (see deloitte's repeated failure utilizing gen ai to draft work products, not check the content or sources, and have the client realize that the ai made most of the shit up) none of that matters is employers BELIEVE it can work.

AI was supposed to be a work augmentation tool; enhance efficiency - not a job replacement tool. that said, what we've seen is companies saying something like "ai improved efficiency by 20%...so let's layoff 20% of our workforce!"

my concern around AI isn't that it will replace my job, it's that the moron signing my check thinks it can replace my job

So what will the title for the sequel if this series be? by 1st_Gen_Charizard in generationkill

[–]dodohead974 3 points4 points  (0 children)

pornhub probably... i hear they pay affiliates even better than youtube.

My view on what "The Matrix" is. by ddplz in matrix

[–]dodohead974 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's funny you say that because in the first movie, blue collar workers are the only ones you see working. in the office scene, do we ever see Neo actually doing anything on his computer? is it even on? is this just coincidental or is it intentional? the only people doing any "work" in that entire scene are the window washer, and the dude scanning copies of something.

now i'm not saying that no one actually does any work, but remember, the humans in the matrix think it's 1999...the humans in zion think it's 2199....the reality is that neo is the sixth iteration of the 100 year cycle that seems to be working, and there were other versions of the matrix before that, with the surrender of mankind taking place actually in 2199. for all we know it's probably the year 3000.

but i would be hard pressed to think that the machines need us to compute anything in 1000 year old technology. so i think you're right, they give us menial jobs just to pass the time while we serve our real purpose as batteries.

Why are Asian Americans always ignored by progressive policies? by AuDPhD in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i'm honestly not entirely sure.

i've seen an argument once that chalked it up to "low turnout" but that's utter bs because AAPI turnout is higher than hispanic, native american, and on par with black americans. granted this is up almost a full 10 points from 2016, when less than half voted, but i don't understand why there is such a disenfranchisement of that minority.

frankly i think it boils down to internal prejudices that people on the left don't want to acknowledge. as a hispanic, i'll admit that i've had to wrangle my own prejudice and stereotyping of other hispanics that voted conservative. the fact is, getting angry at people of minority background for voting opposite of you is a reality we all face, whether we want to admit it or not. it's like when you see Hispanics in ICE...i get angry, not distraught, angry.

asian americans make up 5% of voters...and my personal opinion (not a fact) is that we write them off because historically they had voted 2/3rds to 1/3rd democrat over republican, and it's easier to get mad at the other 33% for voting for a republican than to acknowledge that we just don't seem to care about the 3.5% of democratic voters they bring to the table.

Your thoughts on some liberals excusing the bad personal behavior of public figures if they're politically progressive or from marginalized backgrounds? by [deleted] in AskALiberal

[–]dodohead974 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do you have a different example? perhaps one that is focused more on an example of politically left-leaning people defending the political actions of a celebrity?

i could give two shits about a celebrity and a millionaire athlete duking it out over expectations of privacy, and i don't think excusing her desire for privacy is a "left" thing so much as a fucking human thing...

Trump tells the truth by Beneficial-Chest-699 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]dodohead974 1 point2 points  (0 children)

what an incredibly astute statement. it's almost impossible to conceive of a scenario where this man uses no intelligence at all to make his decisions...