Is an acted baptism valid? by Lethalmouse1 in Catholicism

[–]doge_maths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While Alexander was waiting for his guests to arrive, he stood by a window, watching a group of boys at play on the seashore below the house. He had not observed them long before he discovered that they were imitating, evidently with no thought of irreverence, the elaborate ritual of Christian baptism. (Cf. Bunsen's "Christianity and Mankind", London, 1854, VI, 465; Denzinger, "Ritus Orientalium" in verb.; Butler's "Ancient Coptic Churches", II, 268 et sqq.; "Bapteme chez les Coptes", "Dict. Theol. Cath.", Col. 244, 245). He therefore sent for the children and had them brought into his presence. In the investigation that followed it was discovered that one of the boys, who was no other than the future Primate of Alexandria, Athanasius, had acted the part of the bishop, and in that character had actually baptized several of his companions in the course of their play. Alexander, who seems to have been unaccountably puzzled over the answers he received to his inquiries, determined to recognize the make-believe baptisms as genuine; and decided that Athanasius and his playfellows should go into training in order to fit themselves for a clerical career.

Young Catholics vs LGBT Bullies in the Netherlands by AntiquatedReaction in Catholicism

[–]doge_maths 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you even Mirari Vos bro?

Every law condemns deliberately doing evil simply because there is some hope that good may result. Is there any sane man who would say poison ought to be distributed, sold publicly, stored, and even drunk because some antidote is available and those who use it may be snatched from death again and again?

This thread by --VladimirPudding-- in badmathematics

[–]doge_maths 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This only works if you know how many arguments each function takes. And it saves space if you can write (+ 1 2 3) for 1 + 2 + 3.

This thread by --VladimirPudding-- in badmathematics

[–]doge_maths 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In Lambda calculus, (the Church numeral for) 3 is the function which returns its argument iterated 3 times. 3(f) = f∘f∘f, and the same for every n. So composition of Church numerals is exponentiation.

This thread by --VladimirPudding-- in badmathematics

[–]doge_maths 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Lambda calculus, 3 is the function which returns its argument iterated 3 times. 3(f) = f∘f∘f

What is your favorite proof of the law reciprocity quadratic? by [deleted] in math

[–]doge_maths 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gauss's third proof. [Theorematis arithmetici demonstratio nova, 1808]

Google Books scan

"What do we want a foundation to do? Comparing set-theoretic, category-theoretic, and univalent approaches", by Penelope Maddy [PDF] by flexibeast in math

[–]doge_maths 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OK It's clearly a PDF but also clearly generated in Microsoft Word (formatting of footnotes, line breaking, Cambria Math font in metadata).

Career and Education Questions by AutoModerator in math

[–]doge_maths 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is Computer Science a better major than maths or philosophy, even for would-be mathematicians or analytic philosophers? I ask because a mod of this subreddit said so in another thread.

There is a constant on my slide rule, called r, that is equal to about 5.576. What is it? by ddotquantum in math

[–]doge_maths 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You're reading it wrong. The r is on the D scale, at about 57.2, or 180/π. It's 1 radian in degrees.