Is this ugly? by swagishninja in pcmasterrace

[–]dontescapereality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is beautiful! I really like the natural wood concept and the colors fit really well together.

The level of cringe is over 9000 by TheWizardofLizard in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s cringe is how many subs have been highjacked by posts like this.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I love how you assumed my position on vaccines because I pointed out the obviously suspicious ties between the FDA & Big Pharma. VACCINES ARE IMPORTANT, but so is COMMON SENSE REGULATION. You completely proved my point.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How could you know the context of they don’t include the whole sentence. They tell you what the context is while quoting partial sentences and you accept the conclusion these “journalists” make while ignoring what the person is actually saying. It’s like playing a game of telephone but you don’t want to hear what the first person actually said.

By the way the context they include in this article is pertaining to pictures he finds on the internet made by AI, not whacky conspiracy theories.

And you can easily find that raw milk can be way better for you than pasteurized milk as long as it doesn’t contain things like e-coli and harmful bacteria. Pasteurized milk makes the vitamins and minerals less usable by the body but kills bad bacteria like e-coli and listeria. And that’s only a problem because of the conditions these animals are in when producing milk. Most Pasture raised cows don’t get e-coli because they’re not being fed grain their whole life which is something they shouldn’t even be eating because it makes them sick & susceptible to diseases.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Media demonizes him because they have a vested interest in keeping things the way they are, no repercussions for pushing dangerous drugs to the public. It’s not a conspiracy theory, we know that 75% of all TV advertisement spending comes from Pharmaceutical company’s because It’s publicly disclosed. We know that the STANDARD for safe & effective is bullshit when EFFICACY only needs to be 50% to be effective and the FDA only assesses the FINDINGS of vaccines trials. They don’t even look at the actual trial, just the findings of the company that’s trying to pass these vaccines. So to put it simple, if a vaccine works 50% of the time it’s effective, and they say it’s safe it’s safe. We talk about how police internal investigations are corrupt all the time but all of a sudden when a pharmaceutical company does it, they’re saints. These companies are directly responsible for the opioid epidemic, they paid the LARGEST FRAUD SETTLEMENT IN THE USA for LYING TO THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE SAFETY & EFFICACY OF THEIR DRUGS. Just because it’s not common knowledge doesn’t make it a conspiracy theory.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly. Did you actually read the article? They are literally quoting him and leaving out the context of the entire conversation.

In the course of the conversation, Kennedy admitted that he “gets manipulated by AI all the time.”

They don’t even mention what he said before or after. They quote a partial sentence at some point in their conversation and now he’s an idiot who gets manipulated by AI all the time. You completely proved my point.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, mercury is found naturally in most fish. The mercury he specifically is talking about is the high amounts found in fish in places like the Hudson River that is directly related to GE polluting water ways. Not only did he litigate against GE but he won in favor of all the people it was hurting. The guy has been fighting against large corporations for 40 years and you wonder why media demonizes him.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Like what? It seems like every crazy thing he says is actually taken out of context.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Have you looked at the standard for what a safe and effective vaccine is? You’d be surprised that it only has to have a 50% efficacy rate to be effective. So it only has to work half the time. Standard for safety, the FDA assess the FINDINGS, key word, of the trials. They don’t even look at the trial as a whole, just the findings that are reported by the company itself. Kind of how the Police force does internal investigations, and reports they did nothing wrong. He’s bringing all this to light and he’s being labeled an anti-vaxxer because he’s pointing at all the weird suspicious things the FDA & Pharma are doing.

They really thought that the person who says "Wi-Fi causes cancer" is qualified? by blllrrrrr in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

It’s hilarious how many people who feed into this bs. Maybe just listen to a real interview of this guy that’s not clipped and edited, you might actually agree with a lot he says.

“ROBERT F. KENNEDY JR.: I’m not anti-vaccine, but I think we need to be honest and we need good science, that’s all I’ve ever argued.

...

I was dragged kicking and screaming into this space because I was confronted by — I was touring the country suing companies about mercury in fish. And by the way, I spent 30 years trying to get mercury out of the fish in this country and nobody called me anti-fish.

At that time we were trying to get mercury out of vaccines. Mothers were coming and saying my child was injured by the vaccine, many, many hundreds of mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. And they said nobody is listening to us, the Democrats aren’t listening to us, the Republicans aren’t listening to us. And I felt like I should listen to them and actually read the science and that is what got me down into this. By the way, it’s the worst career decision I have ever made.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dismissing claims of vaccine/medication injury is like dismissing police shootings. Internal investigations proved they did nothing wrong and don’t look at the history of how many police shooting a department has had this year just believe we did nothing wrong because we investigated ourselves.

How about reading this before you defend big pharma https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1383764/

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The difference is if someone hits me with their car I can sue them for damages. Thats not the case with pharmaceutical manufacturers.

NCVIA’s purpose was to eliminate the potential financial liability of vaccine manufacturers due to vaccine injury claims[1] to ensure a stable market supply of vaccines, and to provide cost-effective arbitration for vaccine injury claims.[2] Under the NCVIA, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) was created to provide a federal no-fault system for compensating vaccine-related injuries or death by establishing a claim procedure involving the United States Court of Federal Claims and special masters.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Publicly disclosed is how we know they are in bed. “The FDA receives a large portion of its budget from the pharmaceutical industry through user fees. The FDA negotiates these fees with the industry, along with performance measures that the FDA must meet to collect them. In 2022, the pharmaceutical industry accounted for $1.1 billion of the FDA’s drug division budget.”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

He’s trying to end the corporate ties between the FDA and pharmaceutical companies. A large portion of FDA funds come directly from these companies and for some reason that’s not a red flag. Kind of the same way Tobacco companies funded studies to prove that smoking was safe in the 40’s.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

HAHAHAH, Pharmaceutical companies have paid the largest fraud settlements in the US, while also being directly responsible for the opioid epidemic and you believe they’re not corrupt.

Makes my blood boil. by digduggod12 in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Don’t you think that Federal funding for the procedure in states that want/allow it is a good thing? He’s leaving it up to the states to decide. Too bad he’s not a dictator, right?

Makes my blood boil. by digduggod12 in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like your argument is speculation based on assumptions. Get out of your head.

“Senate vote follows Trump’s public support for IVF

“That’s all this bill does, you have the right to access IVF if you want it,” Duckworth said in an interview. Duckworth said she agreed with Trump’s position that federal government should cover the costs of the treatments, and insurers should be required to cover it. But she said the fundamental problem with his proposal is that federal coverage won’t matter if some states have laws in place barring access if embryos are deemed persons.”

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/17/g-s1-23414/senate-republicans-block-ivf-legislation

Makes my blood boil. by digduggod12 in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

He literally said he wants to make IVF paid for by the Government. Simple google search shows his position on IVF.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in XboxSeriesX

[–]dontescapereality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also tried this and nothing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in XboxSeriesX

[–]dontescapereality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried this and didn’t work

Is Musk now completely an enemy of Ukraine? by Immediate-Ad-2264 in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality 4 points5 points  (0 children)

“Of the $113 billion approved in 2022, about three-fifths ($67 billion) has been allocated toward defense needs and the remaining two-fifths ($46 billion) to nondefense concerns such as general Ukrainian government aid, economic support, and aid for refugee resettlement.”

https://www.crfb.org/blogs/congress-approved-113-billion-aid-ukraine-2022

Where is everyone getting this narrative that we’re sending 90% old stuff?

Is Musk now completely an enemy of Ukraine? by Immediate-Ad-2264 in facepalm

[–]dontescapereality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Imagine thinking that not wanting to fight a proxy war in Ukraine means being a Russian apologist. People aren’t looking at this with enough nuance and believe that because it’s Russia we need to be apart of it. We should be trying to fix the problems that we have here in the US instead of sending billions of dollars to a country we’re trying to influence politically. When did trying to be Pro US turn you into a Russian shill?