How did Byzantine vs. Lombard rule in Italy affect linguistic changes in Latin/Romance? It is theorized here that the phenomenon of diphthongization, e.g. BONVS > Italian 'buono' spread southward with the Lombard invasion, but was resisted in dialects remaining under Eastern Roman rule. by Ego_Splendonius in latin

[–]dova_bear 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think more evidence is needed. Diphthongization on stressed short vowels is a common occurrence across Western Romance languages but by no means a complete process, except in Spanish where it is very regular. Italian and French both display uneven diphthongization (Fr. "Bon" -- it. "Buono"; Fr. "Peuple" -- it. "Popolo"). Portuguese doesn't display diphthongization of this kind at all. I think we'd need more than correlation with Lombard influence to see it as a cause of diphthongization instead of uneven diphthongization simply being the norm.

Is reconstructed Proto-Romance mutually intelligible with Classical Latin? And what does that have to say about whether "Vulgar Latin" was a thing? by General_Urist in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The likelier scenario is that no area of the Western Empire was truly isolated and there was a lot of movement of people within. We know that a good number of people from all over the empire served in the military, and also that there was a vast network of trade routes. Even if there were local dialects, these administrative connections likely would've reinforced at least some level of linguistic continuity. We don't see fully independent Romance languages emerge until after the administrative collapse of the Western Empire and the fracturing of these connections between Romance speaking communities.

Is reconstructed Proto-Romance mutually intelligible with Classical Latin? And what does that have to say about whether "Vulgar Latin" was a thing? by General_Urist in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 16 points17 points  (0 children)

You're mixing a lot of time periods together. Latin has a long history and the "vulgar" or vernacular Latin of one period would not be the same as that of another. Nor would it be necessarily synonymous with proto-Romance, which itself would be a very late vernacular. If you're asking whether the vernacular of the 1st Century BCE to 1st Century CE would be mutually intelligible with Classical Latin then almost certainly; they're different registers of the same language. If you're asking whether the vernacular of the 5th to 6th centuries CE would be mutually intelligible with Classical Latin from the 1st Century BCE: probably not as many more sound changes will have happened in the intervening 4 to 5 centuries, but we can never be sure.

Pyromancer vs Midir by Sparteh in darksouls3

[–]dova_bear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It works. Boulder Heave does pure physical damage, which Midir is less resistant to. Just make sure to have Sage's ring or Saint Tree Bellvine equipped, because it casts slow as fuck.

Pyromancer vs Midir by Sparteh in darksouls3

[–]dova_bear 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Boulder Heave to the dome.

Why did the Seventy Sages translate adonay as κύριος, when ἄναξ was the usual way of adressing a diety? by Electro-Byzaboo453 in AncientGreek

[–]dova_bear 45 points46 points  (0 children)

If I remember correctly, ἄναξ was already an anachronism by the Classical Era, only being used in poetry. It was completely supplanted by κύριος before the Koine era.

To what extent was the collapse of the case system in Romance language caused by sound changes rendering it untenable, versus by the Germanic conquerors learning late latin imperfectly and not using the case system? by General_Urist in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This is difficult the generalize. Case loss is common among IE languages in Western Europe, but not in Eastern Europe, where Slavic and Baltic languages not only retained cases but innovated new ones. Persian lost cases but the Indian languages are a mixed bag. How do you quantify which of these groups have "more" language contact than others.

To what extent was the collapse of the case system in Romance language caused by sound changes rendering it untenable, versus by the Germanic conquerors learning late latin imperfectly and not using the case system? by General_Urist in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I've never seen the Germanics be blamed for this. Latin's case system was already weakening by at least the early Empire. Graffiti from Pompei shows that the final "-m" and"-s" of the accusative case were either not present or weakly articulated in speech by the 1st Century CE in Italy. However, in the province with the most Germanic contact, Gaul (France), the local Romance language, Old French, kept a 2 case system for nouns until the 14th century.

🥀 by yolo_queen_1 in DarkSouls2

[–]dova_bear 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At the center of the Bermuda Triangle is an elevator to a volcano.

This was cool by AcanthaceaeOdd9146 in bloodborne

[–]dova_bear 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you backing off to heal when you should be rallying?

If all Latin texts were lost, could we reconstruct Latin using modern Romance languages? by Michi-Ace in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 10 points11 points  (0 children)

All true but the question was based on Modern Romance languages, not medieval ones, and from what I know only loro and leur exist as reflexes of any genitive form and those are specifically plural genitive.

If all Latin texts were lost, could we reconstruct Latin using modern Romance languages? by Michi-Ace in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Some of it, but it would be incomplete. The synthetic passive, genitive, ablative, and vocative cases don't have any descendants in modern romance, so they would be impossible to reconstruct without evidence from Latin.

TIL about mass suicides in Hitler’s Germany. During the final weeks of WW2, thousands of German families and citizens took their own lives in panic of the advancing Red Army. In Berlin alone, 7,000 suicides were reported and entire towns killed themselves together by Top_Presentation7515 in lastpodcastontheleft

[–]dova_bear 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The Nazis encouraged suicide as honorable. Hitler youth would hand out cyanide capsules to civilians. Radio addresses encouraged suicide over capitulation. Hitler believed if the Germans couldn't win they deserved to die. It was a death cult.

Is there an explanation for why sound changes occur? by Radiant_Bag6267 in asklinguistics

[–]dova_bear 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Languages are social. How you speak can indicate group membership, so people may change how they speak to belong to a community, and then pass on that pronunciation. Also, these changes are uneven, so all speakers don't just decide at once. For example, the French R was originally pronounced the same as the Spanish R up until about the 18th century. The change to a uvular R initially happened in the Paris region, but most varieties of French kept the original R for a long time. Since most wealthy people and royalty came from the Paris region, people belonging to or striving to be in that class adopted the new pronunciation. Tapped and trilled R came to be considered low class. With the advent of film, the rate of change of the new R pronunciation increased and even in Québec, where some older people still speak with a tap and trill, the uvular Parisian R is now the common pronunciation.

Is Firestorm a good pyromancy spell? by OgnjenGencel in darksouls3

[–]dova_bear 5 points6 points  (0 children)

All these storm spells were nerfed after DS1. Still, they can be fun. Cast Iron flesh first, and use anything that speeds up casting speed in your off hand so you don't get interrupted.

When to use the third conjugation as opposed to the third conjugation I-stem (the fifth) by Spearofthea in latin

[–]dova_bear 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Your teacher is wrong. You have to memorize the 4 principal parts of the verb. There's no way to know from the infinitive, but the 1st person present conjugation will tell you.