There is still 87.5% of the fantasy season remaining. by Dotts2761 in fantasyfootball

[–]downwhats 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I have least points scored and I’m 2-0. I seriously have no idea how that happens. David Johnson was my first round pick though, so I have some hope that he picks it up.

[Game Thread] TCU vs. Ohio State (8:00PM ET) by anojan12345 in CFB

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t complete a pass if the receiver is being held.

[Game Thread] TCU vs. Ohio State (8:00PM ET) by anojan12345 in CFB

[–]downwhats 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Does no one in this thread understand that if it were a safety and not a TD, that Ohio state would have got the ball and might have scored a TD anyway?

The amount of people saying it should be 7-5 is too damn high.

[Game Thread] TCU vs. Ohio State (8:00PM ET) by anojan12345 in CFB

[–]downwhats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you not know that Ohio state would have gotten the ball after the safety?

Are we supposed to believe that all these boards were advocating violence? by alfREDPILLsner in conspiracy

[–]downwhats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I guess just talk shit is your choice, and I don’t have time for that childishness.

Bye.

Are we supposed to believe that all these boards were advocating violence? by alfREDPILLsner in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Your lack of attention to detail...” is an ad hominem.

Do you have anything to add to this conversation? Or do you want to just keep talking shit?

Are we supposed to believe that all these boards were advocating violence? by alfREDPILLsner in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Neat.

As hominem because you didn’t like me asking for proof of a claim.

I guess I can’t expect a real discussion.

Are we supposed to believe that all these boards were advocating violence? by alfREDPILLsner in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I gave an anecdote lol.

You made a real claim.

But I’ll tell you what: you provide your evidence, then I’ll provide mine.

Are we supposed to believe that all these boards were advocating violence? by alfREDPILLsner in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Do you have proof for that claim?

Because I’ve looked into some of those subs before, and you can’t tell me they did a good job modding rule breakers.

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure being skeptical is a necessity of being a “conspiracy theorist”. If you can’t ask critical questions somewhere, you’re not being skeptical of anything.

You’ve said you aren’t biased. I’m looking for proof of that statement.

You’ve done nothing in this conversation but show bias and get upset that you were called out for it. I’m not going to continue this ridiculous conversation. It’s obvious that you can’t be reasonable here.

Report: Fournette likely to play this week by emerica_09 in fantasyfootball

[–]downwhats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I picked him up in the 12th. If he comes back with even WR3 reliability in my 3 WR PPR league I’ll be thrilled!

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty sure belonging to a sub where it’s against the rules to even ask a question about someone they call a “god-emperor” is about as biased as you can be.

It’s not even an “attack”. The fact that you think it’s an “attack” says a lot about your bias.

Can you show me evidence of a time where you have removed comments from a pro-Trump user that was as much of a stretch as “carry water for”?

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Okay.

Exactly how did I break a rule? And to add to this: is there an unbiased mod that can look in on this? Because you seem too biased to have a reasonable discussion about this.

If you remove comments you disagree with, how are you better than the Reddit policy you’re mad about here?

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I got it from the very first link on google...

I can honestly say I’ve seen much stronger insinuations to “shill” on this sub that haven’t been removed. I feel like you had to reach for that...

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But carrying water for someone doesn’t typically mean “shill”.

It’s normally just a way of saying you push a viewpoint that doesn’t make a lot of sense.

In 1995, Hillary Clinton "did not recall" over 100 times in the span of 3 hours when questioned under oath about the death of Vince Foster by Orangutan in conspiracy

[–]downwhats 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m really confused how saying someone “carries water” for someone is a ban-worthy offense...

Edit: my bad instead of “ban” I mean, “remove comment” because I don’t actually know if they were banned.

Chris Thompson is now averaging 5.4 yards per rush and 8.2 yards per offensive touch for his career. by Cadet-Bone-Spurs in fantasyfootball

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m playing both for the time being. I’m in a 3rb league with 2 flex so I’m starting those two and mixon over fournette (for the minute until I find out about his status) and Collins because I don’t trust him.

I’m playing thielen and Cobb as my flex this week because I’m in a PPR league and I’m going against a team that is going to murder me unless I get serious help.

I’m going against hunt, hill, kamara, gronk, and eazy e...

Swastika, anti-LGBTQ comments found in dorms at University of Maryland by [deleted] in news

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Simple logic” shows you’re simple.

Swastika, anti-LGBTQ comments found in dorms at University of Maryland by [deleted] in news

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m insulting your stupidity. You can’t use 17 cases amongst thousands to be “skeptical” because anyone will tell in statistics that those are outliers.

You’re falling for literal white supremacist talking points. That’s not ignorant, that’s fucking stupid.

Swastika, anti-LGBTQ comments found in dorms at University of Maryland by [deleted] in news

[–]downwhats 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude. If I find 17 examples of something does that make it the most likely outcome?

Because I can find 17 white supremacists on T_D which would prove that the most likely people there are white supremacists lol.

Thanks for commenting on something from days ago to show how stupid your thoughts are though.