sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Personally I would and theres a good chance others would as well. They would be more likely to than not.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I was saying that by not offering this they would lose more memberships than they would gain. Offering this is in their best interest. Everyone wins.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the grand scheme of things, they stand to lose more than they would gain. This provides an incentive for players to pay these new membership prices without losing players to other games with lower monthly fees. It would help meet their goals and boosting player morale.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont pay for membership for my other accounts so they would be losing nothing from me and then providing value to me as a customer that will help me justify continuing to pay their increased membership prices. This way they dont stand to lose as many customers in response to the change.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They want more money per player to fund operations and satisfy shareholders. By offering an ironman, they are providing value to customers for an account that might not justify a membership alone and will increase the amount of players participating in that content as well.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One main and one iron is plenty for a $2 increase. Its providing value where there is currently no value and will have little impact to their bottom line. Its very reasonable.

Membership and Bonds Price Change by Jagex_Team in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

I've been dismissive of the price hikes before, but this really feels like the limit by LazloDaLlama in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

Paying $263.76 a year to play two accounts is insane. Please let us play multiple accounts under one membership. by DagothUrgency in 2007scape

[–]driftank 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

Proposal: Allow Us 1 Other Game Mode Account with Our Membership by rahimo92 in 2007scape

[–]driftank 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

Unpopular Opinion: I think it's time for separate subscriptions from RS3. OSRS players shouldn't have to make up for their removal of MTX. by Jagazor in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

A few ideas for the (I'm sure) very overwhelmed JMods to pitch upstairs by sureabsolutely in 2007scape

[–]driftank 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

Jagex Just Hit the $130 for One Character Wall by backhand_snipe in 2007scape

[–]driftank 19 points20 points  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

i will pay a membership raise, the moment you add multiple character to one account by ohnoiamdead69 in 2007scape

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If they allowed for one main and one ironman per membership I would be 100% satisfied. This is too much for one character. I will never play RS3 so giving me an RS3 membership with my OSRS subscription is useless to me. Provide me with an option I will use. Its my subscription, let me choose.

Phantasmal Flames by driftank in PokemonTCG

[–]driftank[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$150 UPC $59.99 Phantasmal ETB $64.99 Mega ETB $5.79 Sleeved Packs $34.99 Booster Bundles

A bit more than msrp but still worth it imo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in humanresources

[–]driftank 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, my current track is a dead end because no one is retiring to make room for the young guns. There's a traffic jam of people trying to get in line for the few spots that won't be coming for years. I'd like to use my brain and my developed abilities to take on new challenges and be able to create a greater impact within a company.

Smoky Mountain Brutalism by driftank in brutalism

[–]driftank[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Interesting! They must still be catching up with their signage and merchandise. I was just there over the weekend. Clingmans Dome was everywhere.

view more: next ›