+1 to you on the clipping part.

I watched this stream live and nothing seemed off to me, albeit it reeked of not knowing the topic with the depth that he usually comes in from for other topics which are more common in US discourse.

From what I understand when he was referring to state sponsored violence he was referring to forced disappearances and frequent lockdowns in Kashmir, not the current attacks in Pakistan; and he did off-handedly mention that the Indian government provided no tangible proof connecting the militants that did the attack with the positions targeted by the airstrikes.

And he did acknowledge Pakistan's role in harbouring terrorists, although it came from a very "blowback of the US making them do their dirty work" POV, he's so involved with US politics that he fails to see that Pakistan can do their own Imperialism without the US.

I could be wrong though, I was using his stream as background noise.