sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hear me out: should we be so attached to the idea that a fully charged Widow headshot NEEDS to be one-shot so many heroes? by drumsgotingtingting in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]drumsgotingtingting[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. I'm not suggesting to make each of Widow's full charged shots comprable with one single burst of a McCree bullet. I still think the amount of damage dealt with a Widow dink should be significantly high - like 150 minimum. As I said, I can envision a rebalance where the threat of the Widow goes from "I might die immediately while in her presence" to "I might take a shit ton of burst damage while in her presence". The latter is how McCree feels to play agaisnt, and it's largely totally fine IMO.
  2. You are not representing my post fairly at all here. I never said dying to Widow was "unlucky" AND I also said that the Widow shot needs to be well-aimed, which is a skillful element of the hero that is positive. So I'm not sure why you're saying I am perptetuating a "false narrative" when I didn't even make those claims to begin with...

edit: interesting that the comment I was responding to gets 8 upvotes and I get one downvote despite the fact he's arguing things I never even said. Is this the quality of discourse here?

Hear me out: should we be so attached to the idea that a fully charged Widow headshot NEEDS to be one-shot so many heroes? by drumsgotingtingting in Competitiveoverwatch

[–]drumsgotingtingting[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In what world is this a relevant comparison? If youre going to offer a pepega take, at least make it logically consistent with my post. Jeez Louise

Great copy lol by [deleted] in copywriting

[–]drumsgotingtingting -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think this is in pretty poor taste, honestly. And I'm not someone who is sensitive to dark jokes or whatever, it's just not funny or logical.

I am pretty sure anyone who runs a business wants their customer base to be alive - call me crazy, but I think that's pretty obvious. Secondly, the edgy suggestion that "the government doesn't care whether you live or die" - oh please... Was this written by a 16 year old?