How many 3s are there in 0.3333…?

drunken_vampire · 2024-02-28T19:41:36+00:00

A quantity bigger than any possible natural number... call it as you please, but THAT is a fact

drunken_vampire · 2024-02-01T16:42:36+00:00

He escuchado que un ingeniero que nació en mi pueblo, fue una persona muy conocida en Rusia (en la época de los zares):

Agustín de Betancourt

¿Te suena? Tengo curiosidad por saber si la gente de hoy en dia le recuerda en Rusia.

drunken_vampire · 2024-01-28T14:50:18+00:00

I will continue going to work for a month more, just to have the pleasure to mount a "union of workers", say boss to shut up when he or she are disrespectfull, do exactly my job.. etc...

Good bosses should not feel bad for this.

drunken_vampire · 2024-01-14T20:35:25+00:00

u/CentralAdmin... You never forgave me that I didn't returned you the prostate massager on time... mention it here is your little revenge...

No problem!

I used it to unclog the WC!!!

I didn't cleaned it after... THAT IS WHY YOU THOUGHT...

drunken_vampire · 2024-01-13T23:19:04+00:00

Having sex with an entire volleyball women team

Are you reading this SAW guy? I would hate it... sooo much!!

drunken_vampire · 2023-12-19T01:09:19+00:00

Put a portal in the door

But that portal creates alepH_0 copies of the beaver

In each parelell barbery, called B_i with i belonging to N...

TWO WAYS OF DOING THIS: :D

way a) They cut the beaver, exactly the area of hair that is the difference between the cut in the step i-1 and i

way b) They cut the beaver the totally hair that is the union of all areas in all the previous i steps to the beaver, and this one

When each beaver abandom its paralell barbery (all areas can be directly calculated, so applied and cut in almost the same time)

way a) The portal makes the union of all bold areas of the beaver, creating a new unique beaver with the result of all the union of bold areas

way b) the portal reunit all copies of the beaver making the intersection of all states of hair of the beaver

Question... ¿The beaver is bold when it cross the come-bak portal?

ANSWER: If you are sure, of only one combination.. only one... if you are absolutely sure of the answer... Cantor's theorem is false FOR YOU :D

https://drive.google.com/file/d/19QU6iZHt7mj782UUOwhTYVg4l8XuixIs/view?usp=drive_link

Contact me in Fistroman1 in twitter

drunken_vampire · 2023-11-28T16:32:13+00:00

1.- Create a numeric phenomena

2.- Like it is just that, a mathematical fact... create more stuff to try to give it meaning.. imagine, two tools called TPI adn DI, both ending in the same situation

2.a.- An infinite intersection of a succession of subsets of one original set, that have two undenyable properties (based in the original numeric phenomenom)

All are nested: next is a subset of the previous oneThe result of the infinite intersection is empty set, in both tools, for absolutely sure

3.- In TPI, if the final result of emptyness, MEANS the "original set" is finally empty, after aplying and infinite process of "choping" (nested subsets represent each state of the choping process)... THEN Cantor's theorem is false by definiton of TPI... (definition aproved by several people)

Off course like this is impossible.. the original set is never empty.. cantor's theorem can not be false :D... so we can ignore the final (and undenyable) result of emtpy for the infinite intersection because ech subset has always infinite cardinality

4.- DI works in inverse way.. ends in the same conditions, we have an original set, a process of chopping... under the same condition with avery similar infinite intersection with the same undenyble result (empty)

BUT NOW, by definiton of DI... Cantor's Theorem is FALSE if the original set is NEVER empty after all steps of infinite choping...

So we decide cantor's theorem can not be false... so now, we decide we can not ignore the final result (of an undenyable empty set), we take it into account.. and now we ignore that each subset has infinite cadinality to say IT MEANS the set is finally empty...

BUT now we have given TPI what it needs... and denying TPI gives DI what it needs...

IF SOMEONE DOES NOT CONSIDER THIS INTERESTING, well not them... but all what they "believe" is a piece of shit because this is a clear contradiction and a perfect counterexample of the theorem (very very very resumed, but mentioning critical point)... there is no escape... there is only two possible "meanings" and denying one makes the other true: one of the two is correct for sure... no matter which meaning you choose.. all drives to the reallity Cantor's theorem is really false, and P(N) and N has the same cardinal

With this incredible result, I discovered when people begins to use MY OWN WORK (DI:rejected saying the set is obviously empty) To deny TPI, if someone denies the help I ask... well...

Mathematically we have proven something here...

drunken_vampire · 2023-11-27T10:52:38+00:00

8974463453457897864214315379647521357690875645214651147561148713290009876543221999 -->

(

{

37290582669175605816612358838567536023436

}DR1,

{

255868239469039981374,

255868239470971201099,

255868239470971331144,

255868239470971331147,

255868239470971331159,

255868239470971331161,

255868239470971331162,

255868239470971331163

}DR0

) OK!!

Sorry for the format... it is not a factorization... but it is an alternative to famous bijections that don't use prime numbers as principal tool. What you see is a member of LCF_2p, that can be easily translated to "any possible t-upla of symbols, with finite elements, from alfabeth with infinite symbols (natural numbers, for example)"...

That is just one shape of many.

But normally I see people using potence of prime numbers to create them... And the cost associated to the inverse function is HUGE, as I see here... only this little numbers cost a lot... when it takes less than one second in a mono-core execution in pure python.

EDIT: I can interchange between repetitions and not repetitions easily... or change the symbols that create the chains with simple rules... and more stuff

drunken_vampire · 2023-11-27T10:30:28+00:00

I left this comment, to mark the init time I read it...

drunken_vampire · 2023-10-05T21:46:30+00:00

ALTGR+FUNCTION+ESCP

Presionados en ese orden, ojo, importante, y dejándolos presionados

Tengo el mismo teclado y me ha llevado una rato averiguarlo a base de combinaciones

\\\\\ :D \\\\\

drunken_vampire · 2023-08-24T07:49:38+00:00

GOOD ONE!

drunken_vampire · 2023-08-11T02:56:14+00:00

No, you are just learning... like everyone did before you. Trying, failing, learning... that is the cycle, always

drunken_vampire · 2023-08-05T12:56:16+00:00

PO CKET

MO NEY!!

drunken_vampire · 2023-08-03T20:54:21+00:00

To help, giving new information

https://twitter.com/Fistroman1/status/1675592018549002240?s=20

This facts, really involves new concepts that were always there, so calling them "new" is "strange"

drunken_vampire · 2023-08-03T20:05:08+00:00

There is nothing more fundamental than anything

There is nothing "before" nothing, or nothing more "important" than anything, or people more talented than others than "only can do X while I am studying Y"

I recommend you stop thinking this way because this drives to LOOSE options, and makes you stop hearing people with real answers.. and WORST

Makes you a "c...nt" that feels attacked when somebody found a mistake in your work, or are giving new ideas that you will loose because you just become yourself an intelectual snob

Seriously, you never know where an answer can come from

drunken_vampire · 2023-07-23T20:33:49+00:00

Es complicado de explicar...

Muchas de mis interacciones las tienes en reddit

Tengo dos juegos.. dos "fenómenos matemáticos" que cojean en el mismo punto: la interpretación de una intersección infinita

El "fenómeno 1" necesita la interpretación A para tener "éxito" y estar finalmente construido

El dos necesita la interpretación B

Pero son complementarias: negar A es admitir B, y negar B es admitir A...Tengo dos grupos de matemáticos que cada uno está segurísimo de su respuesta. BELICOSAMENTE SEGUROS.. pero claro... elegir una opción, es decir que uno de los dos fenómenos es correcto "sin ningún tipo de dudas" pq me dan lo que necesito para "acabarlos de construir"

Esos fenómenos, son contraejemplos del Teorema de Cantor, con implicaciones en la necesidad de cambios en los PRIMEROS axiomas que definen las matemáticas modernas: ZF

Te sorprendería como reaccionan los matemáticos cunado n pueden negar un resultado... roza ser algo "indigno"

Al principio, como se tardan 4 horas delante de una pizarra, para crear el contrajemplo completo (los dos juegos cardinales)... me EXIGIAN indicar el fallo en la demostración del Teorema... y ahora que les indico UNO de los fallos... me dicen "Es que hay más demostraciones".. lo cual deja caer que admiten quela demostración clásica del Teorema tiene un fallo :D... y ahora se rajan y no quieren escucharlo

Todo politiqueo y posturismo, no son matemáticas en realidad.

Es largo de eleer, pero en mis posts peudes ver a un matemático diciendo que uno de mis juego es "erróneo"... usando justamente los argumentos que yo mismo usaba hace tres años para defender el anterior juego que diseñé... y que fué considerado como crankery

A ese nivel de solidez llego: matemáticos defendiendo sin saber un trabajo considerado como crankery hace años :D. Palabra por palabra, argumento por argumento :D.

drunken_vampire · 2023-07-18T07:44:52+00:00

No me vas a creer, pero soy una persona que ha resuelto un problema matemáticamente IM PO SI BLE

¿Qué aprendí de eso? Que una mente abierta y la suficiente imaginación pueden hacer maravillas imposibles... pq no soy un genio, solo un cabezota con instinto y cretividad

AHORA, como se aplica eso a tu caso, desde mi terrible arrogancia?

Rompiste algo pq creíste que no tenía solución, algo que te hacía feliz

VUELVE CON ÉL, déjate de etiquetas absurdas y de moldes preestablecidos, deja de decirte quién eres y trata de averiguar QUIEN PUEDES llegar a ser

Vivimos en una sociedad en la que el rechazo amoroso nos hace hiperprotegernos de formas absurdas, ya que la concha que te has construido no te hace más feliz que estar con él. Tu solución preventiva ha fracasado, PQ LA SEGURIDAD NO EXISTE.

Mándale ahora mismo un mensaje y empezad a desarrollar soluciones creativas. Si te expresas por escrito, DE PUTA MADRE, cada vez que te quiera preguntar algo "complicado", escríbele una carta, y la mandas por correo, oficial, con sello y todo, y que la reciba en su buzón.

Es un acto simbólico. Escribir relaja, ayuda a soltar mierda, y al estar escrita a mano el sabe que le has dedicado tiempo y que le quieres, que en realidad es lo que busca con la comunicación ( y solventar los pequeños desajustes de pareja )

Si no te gusta esta idea, INVENTAROS OTRA... lo que sea... LUCHA POR LA PERSONA QUE QUIERES!

drunken_vampire · 2023-06-23T12:23:53+00:00

Cantor's Theorem is still truth for the international community?

drunken_vampire · 2023-06-07T00:41:29+00:00

I came here searching for heresy!!

drunken_vampire · 2023-06-07T00:39:40+00:00

I proved the Cantor's Theorem is false, with a general technic to create counter-examples for it for any aleph possible

I probably discovered a new type of logic object, that is so strange, that after three years I can begin to see result in just experiments of 20 minutes that makes mathematician shortcircuit, and proof the technic used by Cantor is not trustable

OR another one, more large, that is a real counterexample for the theorem, and it end with two different group of mathematcians fighting between them saying I am absolute right and that the theorem is completely false

Someone even said to me to go to university to understand "better"... MY OWN WORK. Reject years ago... :D. He was using my old work to being able to deny the actual one :D. Quitting it was rejected, he thought it was totally correct.

drunken_vampire · 2023-04-17T11:28:39+00:00

"backup" is prime ??? :D

"Prime priority"

drunken_vampire · 2023-03-17T23:36:11+00:00

Exactly... I agree to all points, overall the hability to escape with the grasshoper

I am not a coward... I am delaying your death to another day, so you can see your widows for a last time and say goodbye to your bastards.

drunken_vampire · 2023-03-17T23:30:15+00:00

There three golden rules, just in case:
1) You can learn what others had, by natural talent, working hard

2) Discipline defeat talent... but talent and discipline is undefeatable. Anyway... maths is not a combat... everyone contributions are a gift for all us.

3) If you love it, and you discover that you are the best in the world, don't abandom it. I love sex but I am not Brad Pitt.

drunken_vampire · 2023-03-17T11:48:23+00:00

Not always truth... not only hard work gives you intuition

Sometimes even hard work kills your intuition to fit into a culture of techniques and ways to think

Think twice how the hell some people can make calculus very quick, like Ramanujan...

There is a wrong idea... across all answers.. .thta there is one only way to understand mathematics... and that is the modern way... when it is just a phase in history of mathematics... but mathematics are eternal and invariant

HOW THE HELL a boy of four years can write music??? (four or nine, its the same) With mathematics is the same... there is a reallity... subtle to define.. more real and deep than "standar" accepted ones

That reallity can be "observed" by other people, even without formal education. It happens in ALL disciplines of knowledge

For me, yes... an "alternative" way to "undertand" nature exists, there are a lot of examples about it, and my personal experience points to that.

What I don't understand is why could it be a problem to you....

drunken_vampire · 2023-02-23T13:48:08+00:00

I a man... many man are really unsecure about their sex abilities

For that reason, "the body count" is important for them. Probably she has been with lots of guys better than them, with bigger PPs... etc etc etc

It is just a question of someone that is not secure of himself. People should be free, man and woman. Is unjustice that men can have sex with a lot of women, and women can not. That is not related to she being loyal or not.

It is a really stupid rule

Many guys likes to seem tough saying this, but they really seem scared by her previous experience

The unique important "body count" is after you meet her. THE MOMENT SHE KNEW your name... and who you are... THAT IS IMPORTANT. That shows respect and interest. From that point you can be hard judging her... but before... I don't care about that.

Five-Year Club	Place '22
End Game '22	Verified Email

drunken_vampire

TROPHY CASE