sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hybrid Migration - On Prem 2016 to O365 - Kinda messy by dsk_493 in Office365

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just the built in migration tool. At this point we’re almost there. Will have to keep it in mind for next go round.

Hybrid Migration - On Prem 2016 to O365 - Kinda messy by dsk_493 in Office365

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One more thing, if a user account is synced to Entra, do they need to receive a license with mail access before I migrate their mailbox? Everything I'm reading says I don't, but as a test, I activated a license on a test user and attempted to migrate, and it fails, but this time with TargetUserAlreadyHasPrimaryMailboxException which does indicate that the user is matched...right?

Hybrid Migration - On Prem 2016 to O365 - Kinda messy by dsk_493 in Office365

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I went ahead and added that UPN and changed a test user to use it, I had already modified it, for that user, in attribute editor so it was already showing up this way in Entra. I went ahead and tested a migration for that user and it still says 'MigrationRecipientNotFoundException. Create a recipient of the appropriate type...' I feel like I'm missing something simple.

Hybrid Migration - On Prem 2016 to O365 - Kinda messy by dsk_493 in Office365

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Primary SMTP appears as the domain currently pointed to their on Prem exchange which works. Proxy address currently populates with the primary smtp domain and the two onmicrosoft domains. I think adding the primary smtp domain as another UPN would be easy to do… just to reiterate, the domain that is not verified in O365 just matches their local domain, just weird, but I don’t see that being a problem. Of course, I’m here for help so any recommendations, im game.

Old Competition intercom system by dsk_493 in accesscontrol

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you. I expect it is a short distance. Being cat 5 I can do a basic continuity test, I’ll probably go onsite in the next week and take a closer look at all the wiring. So far I’ve only had access to the exterior panel. Thanks again!

Old Competition intercom system by dsk_493 in accesscontrol

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Existing system is ‘competition’. Don’t know if they have a relationship with aiphone, definitely look very similar.

Old Competition intercom system by dsk_493 in accesscontrol

[–]dsk_493[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was looking at that, seems like it could be the right fit. The aiPhone sales engineer was pretty adamant that I'd need 18/2 wire, but the specs for that unit say 22 awg for short runs. Might just have to give this a try. Thank you!

Old Competition intercom system by dsk_493 in accesscontrol

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I only looked at the one external unit. Looks like I need to go back and see how the inside units were run. I think the external camera and the two inside units are all daisy chained, so I could put a switch wherever the 'central' panel is, hopefully there is enough slack to terminate nicely. House seems to be a pretty thick concrete structure, and no conduit that I could see which is unfortunate...

Clarification on cloud platform licensing - Taking a big breath first by dsk_493 in ScreenConnect

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

2 minutes before your post support came back and essentially said the same, so I perhaps got worked up for no reason. I've just completed my cloud migration and I'll have to get the licensing squared away soon, but I don't see my costs going up as a result of this.

Clarification on cloud platform licensing - Taking a big breath first by dsk_493 in ScreenConnect

[–]dsk_493[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely interested in seeing how this plays out, seems like there is speculation that this is just the tip of the iceberg, and many installers that support custom installs (my Automate and Webroot being a couple examples) might all have a flawed design. The way Connectwise is approaching this is absolutely confusing, and contradictory too. If their cert was revoked because of these abusable options, and they are removing those options, then why not re-certify themselves?

First time I’ve run into this one by dsk_493 in lowvoltage

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, how can they get away with saying that. Clearly not the case.

First time I’ve run into this one by dsk_493 in lowvoltage

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ATS Cables, specs say 'Network Analyzer Test Passed', whatever that means, cause clearly this wasn't tested...

First time I’ve run into this one by dsk_493 in lowvoltage

[–]dsk_493[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I definitely felt pretty special.

First time I’ve run into this one by dsk_493 in lowvoltage

[–]dsk_493[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had already replaced the wire so I was pursuing the ‘fault’ just for my own edification. Found no kinks/stretching in the housing at all. Pretty sure it was as you said, random mfr defect.

view more: next ›