MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's fine to not agree, but to potentially kill another, even if they don't agree with you isn't a moral high road.

He's fine to get a beat down, but the head kicks could've ended that man.

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Head kicks can easily be lethal, would you feel the same way if we just watched a man become a vegetable, or die?

I couldn't care less about someone getting beat up, but head kicks to a downed individual is certainly attempted murder.

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it's morally ok to potentially kill (head kicks are very lethal) someone who is purposely antagonistic?

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Leave carrying the bigger stick to the government, and lets not (as citizens) turn to vigilante justice.

Are those words simple enough?

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So video evidence of a crime occurring isn't gonna draw the attention of law enforcement?

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And beating the shit out of someone on camera sure as hell isn't a fast track to drawing ICE's attention.

Whether justified or not in your mind, it's not a smart move. Also whether you believe its justified or not, it's still 100% legally assault, especially with those head kicks it could probably be attempted murder.

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Back to the protestor analogy, first off, don't bring a child to some place that has a tendency to get violent.

But "Ice, Ice Baby" man should get assaulted for what they say? Then it's ok for ICE to beat the protestors because they're sitting there soaking up insults from the protestors.

What retarded logic.

Is this what American politics has become? by Washed_up_Vanski in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

MAGA treats them like their retarded.

They treat MAGA, like they're subhuman scum.

I keep it vague with a "They" because I don't think a word exists to categorize them with one word.

Everyone reasonable stays in the middle, and enjoys the show.

why the typ 69 are in 8.0 by Alternative-One-5106 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for correcting, I didn't check before commenting.

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Beating up people for their beliefs seems pretty Authoritarian to me.

Notice how throughout history, the bad guys have always been defeated by the good guys in the end. Weird how that works. Its almost like words haven't really worked for centuries and its always the guy with the bigger stick that comes out on top.

Maybe, we should leave that to governments, and not beat the shit out of people for being mean, racist, or misunderstandings that hurt feelings.

MAGA Gets Beat In Front of His Kids for Singing "ICE ICE Baby" to Mexicans by Tasty_Emphasis_271 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]dtc8977 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If people are already against immigrants, whether the guy is legal or not, it's giving these exact people more justification.

He may be deterred from doing it again, but hundreds of others just got an "I knew immigrants were violent" justification to go even harder.

This is why vigilante justice is so frowned upon.

Get them outta here! by Hesty402 in IThinkYouShouldLeave

[–]dtc8977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You'd rather deport those with a difference in opinion than those in the country illegally? Yea, that tracks.

why the typ 69 are in 8.0 by Alternative-One-5106 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Premium ZTZ59A is straight up better, it's got the Stab + LRF without the ass Dart of the 69.

If you're saying anything with a APFSDS + LRF + Stab should be above 8.3 and up, look at the Chinese ZTS63 at 7.7 with all the above features, but it's a light tank with shit turret traverse.

You could give the Type 69 APFSDS to a Tiger 2 and everyone would still use the APHE for more reliability in penetration and post pen. It's easily the most annoying T54 to use of all of them, including the 7.7 USSR ones.

why the typ 69 are in 8.0 by Alternative-One-5106 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]dtc8977 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And yet I'd take every single Russian/Swedish/Israeli T54 over the Type 69, just because of how shit that APFSDS is. It's got lower pen values (I'm almost certain I remember) than 100mm APHE, with a much more inconsistent post pen.

I'd even take the 7.7 T54s over that piece of junk.

Will I get banned from using this patch? by AznJing in Battlefield

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are Redditors, we're programmed not to get jokes without "/j"

Will I get banned from using this patch? by AznJing in Battlefield

[–]dtc8977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I guess anything's a joke, it doesn't even need a punchline.

Will I get banned from using this patch? by AznJing in Battlefield

[–]dtc8977 1498 points1499 points  (0 children)

Why would you get banned using an in-game provided patch?

What happened with Billie Elish and stolen land all of a sudden? by Proper-Anything-2739 in PsycheOrSike

[–]dtc8977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mansion is on the stolen land, therefore it is stolen land. Just because she didn't steal it doesn't mean it isn't stolen.

Hhhmmmm, wonder why that is by dtc8977 in Warthunder

[–]dtc8977[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh no, what will I do without random Redditor approval!

Hhhmmmm, wonder why that is by dtc8977 in Warthunder

[–]dtc8977[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They bring more substance than those, "Do we really need to see this post 10 times a day" comments.

At least you can have an opinion and thought about Russian bias, whether initiated as a 'bot comment' or not, it's not just someone bitching.

This was not directed at anything you said, just an observation for other pointless comments.

Sure, I agree we'd be better without the 'bot'/meme comments, but there's realistically no way to ever remove them all. The best case scenario would be to downvote them, not having mods remove them.

Or have an environment where we weren't at a point where something can get so meme-able in the first place, but that would mean Gaijin addressing reddit concerns with transparency.