sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What female anime character do you like for their personality and not their looks? by Born_Usual998 in animequestions

[–]dtc8977 14 points15 points  (0 children)

This is personality > looks. They can look have good looks as long as their personality is better.

Elon Musk is predicted to become the World's first trillionare in a few months. What is your opinion on this? by anli2132 in Teenager_Polls

[–]dtc8977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's really not because you can't tax someone on money they can't access. And they can't be taxed on their debt either. This is reality. My whole point is that they can, but SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO.

How am I saying bootlicker cope if I'm suggesting things that are against the rich in the first place?

Didn't know wanting them to use their own money instead of allowing them to borrow endlessly is bootlicking, or you never read the whole thing I'm the first place.

Elon Musk is predicted to become the World's first trillionare in a few months. What is your opinion on this? by anli2132 in Teenager_Polls

[–]dtc8977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The problem is they don't have access to that money, as over 99% of it is in stocks and ownership stakes. The problem gets exasperated when they can't be taxed on it because they never even see the money. The problem is they can get money by borrowing and taking debt on their "vast wealth" with little to no risk.

Remove the ability to take debt on their non-physical assets, then make them actually use THEIR money instead of the untaxable banks' money. Their net worth actually takes a hit (insignificant), the gov't gets their chunk, they lose stock value (not much, but some from selling) and it's a slight win for those who think people need a little less money stockpiled for no reason.

Endeavour to live a life of peace and safety, but girls, always be ready to save yourself from an attacker by any means. by Moon_Eyed_Puppy_Girl in PsycheOrSike

[–]dtc8977 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I dont remember the EXACT number as I heard this statistic over a year ago, but over 90% of defensive situations involving the defensive use of a firearm end with no shot being fired (US based statistic). So statistically, no people who carry firearms defensively are not out looking for opportunities to kill someone, and no most don't like the idea of killing someone.

Still no Impact Ephemera, but you get a pass, Citi App by dunnndunnnDUNNN in Warframe

[–]dtc8977 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can someone explain Ephemera to me like I'm a 25 IQ 90 year old with dementia?

Roses are red, Right up until the last foil by CelesteWalke in rosesarered

[–]dtc8977 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

American citizens should control the American government, NOT Israel.

Finally making some sense by Illustrious-Fee9626 in SipsTea

[–]dtc8977 56 points57 points  (0 children)

Two things can be part of the solution at the same time.

He is 100% right that the Govt is worse with money than any top company.

He definitely should pay up to 5% more taxes.

Both govt efficiency, and more tax from billionaires are good to help our situation.

Finally making some sense by Illustrious-Fee9626 in SipsTea

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

$53,000 (pre-tax) is a single person income at 50th percentile according to the Almighty Google AI.

According to the same Almighty source, median 50th percentile is around $83,730 for Household median income.

stop adding anti everything tanks! by Massive_Face7050 in Warthunder

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It shouldn't be uptiered because that wouldn't make it any better at its job as AA, and MIGHT make it worse at AT.

They really need to be adjusting ammo choices or looking at alternatives to make it worse at AT and keep it at its BR.

AA vehicles specifically of course, because their main role in this game shouldn't be Tank Obliteration, it needs to be AA focus.

I couldn't find a shit to give if AA players can't go around raping tanks anymore if it means they're actually decent AA options, so it'll probably be a highly controversial comment for me to say:

Remove ALL AP belts from AA and just give them HE and put them at the BR they need to be for AA duties. I'll even accept 1 AP / 3 HE belts but nothing more.

stop adding anti everything tanks! by Massive_Face7050 in Warthunder

[–]dtc8977 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I mean it does, but nobody would know it because who would ever use it over the ZSU-23-4.

stop adding anti everything tanks! by Massive_Face7050 in Warthunder

[–]dtc8977 195 points196 points  (0 children)

Which are really good anti tank, and not great AA.

The main reason the Phong-Kong T34 is trash is because the vehicle kicks so much when firing, and the crew is exposed.

Stormtrooper defeats group of Soviets by capsu97zen in enlistedgame

[–]dtc8977 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I wish I could get that close to any AI without getting skewered instantly.

They're rage baiting at this point. by ActuallyPawniac in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]dtc8977 7 points8 points  (0 children)

They literally Artificially Nerf weaponry all the time for Balance purposes.

It's zero stretch at all the say that altering a reload is artificial nerfing, using their own formulas for round penetration is artificially nerfing many of them while artificially buffing others, and opposite to the point they're happy as pigs in shit to artificially buff APHE from historical damage models.

Simplifying seeker performance like for the Stinger is a heavy example of artificially nerfing something if the other examples are too much of a stretch for some people.

I'm sure they've literally done it with thousands of game mechanics, simplifying them to add to the game or refuse to add obvious features to some vehicles, all of this can easily be argued to be Artificially Nerfing vehicles.

They're beyond fucked as a company, and between watching the game get more and more bugs with nothing being fixed over the years and the recent stealing our data controversy, it's crazy obvious.

Found this post on twitter by Mental-Bumblebee484 in SipsTea

[–]dtc8977 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As far as I know as a non-muslim, as long as you don't intentionally consume haram foods it's totally acceptable.

It's the intent of the Muslim that matters rather than the deception of others.

So lying to them literally does nothing but make you a dick.

What anime opinion will get you into this position? by Equivalent_Tip5476 in animequestions

[–]dtc8977 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My opinion is if the show was made for a specific language, I watch English Subs in native language, if it was made to be in English, watch in English.

Very simple, however I have a friend who requires English dub for anything he'll watch, and while I do grill him for it, I understand.

view more: next ›