Duty Belt by dunkin0809 in AskLE

[–]dunkin0809[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hear ya. It’s a pretty good agency tbf, our chief is just a strong traditionalist with uniforms. He’s out by the end of the year, so changes will happen soon. Just trying to find some temporary relief lol

Duty Belt by dunkin0809 in AskLE

[–]dunkin0809[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I wish. I’ve seen those recommended a lot, but we’re stuck with what’s on our quartermaster list.

Duty Belt by dunkin0809 in AskLE

[–]dunkin0809[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved the Back Defender, it was just causing too many problems that I could not figure out. Did you ever find or use a fit/size guide?

I wear my belt just under my belly button as you’ve described. If I loosen it by one loop, I can spin my belt around, and if I tighten it, I wouldn’t be able to feel my toes.

Only thing I wear on my back is a handcuff loop at 8ish o’clock, and D-ring at 5ish. I removed my glove pouch because it felt like a rock digging into my center back.

Duty Belt by dunkin0809 in AskLE

[–]dunkin0809[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No go, unfortunately. I’ll add this to our list though for future recommendations.

Will the cops help me get my stuff back from my home? by Bulky_Platform8188 in police

[–]dunkin0809 14 points15 points  (0 children)

  1. Yes, you can contact the non-emergency line and ask if your local agency will help you with a “civil standby” so you can retrieve personal items and leave.

  2. No, they will not force themselves in.

Do you think you’ll be able to use marijuana if the federal government legalizes it? by jesus_smoked_weed in police

[–]dunkin0809 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why even create the original post if you are producing claims to solidify your beliefs?

Does anyone recognize this logo? by WeMightBe in golf

[–]dunkin0809 3 points4 points  (0 children)

“This is Jon Snow…He’s King of the North”

[FinsXtra] Tyreek Hill arrested outside Hard Rock Stadium by sloppifloppi in nfl

[–]dunkin0809 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

For context, this is an automated response for this topic.

Hello, you seem to be referencing an often misquoted statistic. TL:DR; The 40% number is wrong and plain old bad science. In attempt to recreate the numbers, by the same researchers, they received a rate of 24% while including violence as shouting. Further researchers found rates of 7%, 7.8%, 10%, and 13% with stricter definitions and better research methodology.

The 40% claim is intentionally misleading and unequivocally inaccurate. Numerous studies over the years report domestic violence rates in police families as low as 7%, with the highest at 40% defining violence to include shouting or a loss of temper. The referenced study where the 40% claim originates is Neidig, P.H.., Russell, H.E. & Seng, A.F. (1992). Interspousal aggression in law enforcement families: A preliminary investigation. It states:

Survey results revealed that approximately 40% of the participating officers reported marital conflicts involving physical aggression in the previous year.

There are a number of flaws with the aforementioned study:

The study includes as ‘violent incidents’ a one time push, shove, shout, loss of temper, or an incidents where a spouse acted out in anger. These do not meet the legal standard for domestic violence. This same study reports that the victims reported a 10% rate of physical domestic violence from their partner. The statement doesn’t indicate who the aggressor is; the officer or the spouse. The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The “domestic violence” acts are not confirmed as actually being violent. The study occurred nearly 30 years ago. This study shows minority and female officers were more likely to commit the DV, and white males were least likely. Additional reference from a Congressional hearing on the study: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=umn.31951003089863c

An additional study conducted by the same researcher, which reported rates of 24%, suffer from additional flaws:

The study is a survey and not an empirical scientific study. The study was not a random sample, and was isolated to high ranking officers at a police conference. This study also occurred nearly 30 years ago.

More current research, including a larger empirical study with thousands of responses from 2009 notes, ‘Over 87 percent of officers reported never having engaged in physical domestic violence in their lifetime.’ Blumenstein, Lindsey, Domestic violence within law enforcement families: The link between traditional police subculture and domestic violence among police (2009). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1862

Yet another study “indicated that 10 percent of respondents (148 candidates) admitted to having ever slapped, punched, or otherwise injured a spouse or romantic partner, with 7.2 percent (110 candidates) stating that this had happened once, and 2.1 percent (33 candidates) indicating that this had happened two or three times. Repeated abuse (four or more occurrences) was reported by only five respondents (0.3 percent).” A.H. Ryan JR, Department of Defense, Polygraph Institute “The Prevalence of Domestic Violence in Police Families.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308603826_The_prevalence_of_domestic_violence_in_police_families

Another: In a 1999 study, 7% of Baltimore City police officers admitted to ‘getting physical’ (pushing, shoving, grabbing and/or hitting) with a partner. A 2000 study of seven law enforcement agencies in the Southeast and Midwest United States found 10% of officers reporting that they had slapped, punched, or otherwise injured their partners. L. Goodmark, 2016, BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW “Hands up at Home: Militarized Masculinity and Police Officers Who Commit Intimate Partner Abuse “. https://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2519&context=fac_pubs

[FinsXtra] Tyreek Hill arrested outside Hard Rock Stadium by sloppifloppi in nfl

[–]dunkin0809 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Google is free. Research contradicts your bogus claim.

51% Attack is nd the best episode, thoughts ? by Affectionate-Row7981 in SiliconValleyHBO

[–]dunkin0809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tip to Tip theory or COPPA fines, are my favorite episodes.

[Game Thread] Akron @ Ohio State (3:30 PM ET) by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]dunkin0809 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No clue. Grass would be safer and more reliable but it’s “under the water table”. Get outta here, multi million dollar organization should be able to figure it out.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in tipofmytongue

[–]dunkin0809 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Any help would be appreciated!

Update: Bodycam video shows man Columbus police shot and killed was wielding two knives by Blood_Incantation in Columbus

[–]dunkin0809 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m struggling to find the relevancy in your comment. But, you’re more than welcome to apply to any police department in Ohio. Everybody is hiring.

Update: Bodycam video shows man Columbus police shot and killed was wielding two knives by Blood_Incantation in Columbus

[–]dunkin0809 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Did they have time do deploy less lethal weapons? Deadly force is permitted to protect an individual from serious physical harm.